Abstract
Abstract. The Rapid Serial Visual Presentation procedure is a method widely used in visual perception research. In this paper we propose an adaptation of this method which can be used with auditory material and enables assessment of statistical learning in speech segmentation. Adult participants were exposed to an artificial speech stream composed of statistically defined trisyllabic nonsense words. They were subsequently instructed to perform a detection task in a Rapid Serial Auditory Presentation (RSAP) stream in which they had to detect a syllable in a short speech stream. Results showed that reaction times varied as a function of the statistical predictability of the syllable: second and third syllables of each word were responded to faster than first syllables. This result suggests that the RSAP procedure provides a reliable and sensitive indirect measure of auditory statistical learning.
References
2008). On-line assessment of statistical learning by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 952–964.
(2014). Visual statistical learning in children and young adults: How implicit? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1541. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01541
(2013). Side Effects of Being Blue: Influence of Sad Mood on Visual Statistical Learning. PLoS One, 8, e59832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059832.t003
(2012). How implicit is visual statistical learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 1425–1431.
(1993). Psyscope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using MacIntosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271.
(1996). The MBROLA Project: Towards a set of high-quality speech synthesizers free of use for non-commercial purposes. Proc. ICSLP’96, (Vol. 3, 1393–1396). Philadelphia, PA: IEEE.
(1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 414–420.
(2011). Statistical learning of two artificial languages presented successively: How conscious? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00229
(2014). Assessing segmentation processes by click detection: Online measure of statistical learning, or simple interference? Behavior Research Methods, Advance online publication. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0548-x
(2011). The word segmentation process as revealed by click detection. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 212–223.
(1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 159–207.
(2013). Combining fMRI and behavioral measures to examine the process of human learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 109, 193–206.
(2009). Testing assumptions of statistical learning: Is it implicit and long-term? Neuroscience Letters, 461, 145–149. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.030
(2002). Visual statistical leaning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83, B35–B42.
(1980).
(Speech perception: A model of acoustic- phonetic analysis and lexical access . In R. A. ColeEd., Perception and production of fluent speech (pp. 243–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.2006). Dissociating the effects of automatic activation and explicit expectancy on reaction times in a simple associative learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 955–965.
(2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: Two approaches, one phenomenon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 233–238.
(2009). Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants. Child Development, 80, 674–685.
(1988). Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 563–575.
(2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, . doi: 10.1002/wcs.78
(1996). Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928.
(1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606–621.
(1997). Incidental language learning. Psychological Science, 8, 101–105.
(2002). Dissociation between priming and recognition in the expression of sequential knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 362–367. doi: 10.3758/BF03196294
(1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367–447.
(2003). When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39, 706–716.
(2005, May). Attention and automaticity in visual statistical learning, Talk presented at Vision Sciences Society Conference, Sarasota, FL. Abstract published in Journal of Vision, 5, 1067a
(2010). Implicit perceptual anticipation triggered by statistical learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11177–11187.
(