skip to main content
10.1145/3440084.3441218acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiscsicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Design of A Virtual Reality Scenario and Scent Generator for Sensory Training

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the food industry, what makes the difference between a company and its competitors is the quality of its food product, and one of the components that makes quality is the flavor of a product. As trends shift to meet consumer's health and wellness desires formulas are changed with companies trying to retain the same flavoring. This shifting has led to the increased demand of sensory analysis tests. Some of the limitations for sensory analysis is the required space to have the individual booths, time consuming preparation, and material costs. But even with the previous limitations, one of the most important is the training of new users and calibration of existing users. With the development of virtual reality this problem can be more easily rectified by creating a virtual scenario that utilizes all senses and reduces cost of training. The main objective of this research is the development of a virtual scenario for sensory training. This is achieved by recreating a traditional testing environment and training program to analyze scents provided by a scent generator prototype. The methodology will include the design of the training, recreating the environment, programming the interaction with the user and finally the development of a scent generator to release scents.

References

  1. Stone, H, & Sidel, J. (1993) Sensory Evaluation Practices, 2nd ed. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. IFT (Institute of Food Technologists) (2007) Sensory Evaluation Methods. The Society for the Food Technologists, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Meilgaard, M., Vance, G., & Thomas, B. (1999). Sensory Attributes and the Way We Perceive Them. In: Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 3rd Edition. CRC Press (Eds) Chapter 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Alaoui-Ismaili, O., Vernet-Maury, E., Dittmar, A., Delhomme, G., & Chanel, J. (1997). Odor hedonics: Connection with emotional response estimated by automatic parameters, Chemical Senses, 223, pp. 237--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Narumi, T., Nishizaka, S., Kajinami, T., Tanikawa, T. & Hirose, M. (2011). Meta Cookie +: An Illusion-Based Gustatory Display, Virtual and Mixed Reality, pp. 260--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alaraj, A., Lemole, M.G., Finkle, J.H., Yudkowsky, R., Wallace, A., Luciano, C., Banerjee, P., Rizzi, S., & Charbel, F. (2011). Virtual reality training in neurosurgery: Review of current status and future applications. Surg Neurol Int. pp. 2--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Zaho, Z.X. (2002). Virtual reality technology: an overview. J. Southeast Univ. 32 (2), pp. 1--10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sherman, W.R., & Craig, A.B. (2003). Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design, First ed. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. de Wijk, Kooijman, V., Verhoeven, R.H.G., Holthuysen, N.T.E. & de Graaf, C. (2012) Autonomic nervous system responses on and facial expressions to the sight, smell, and taste of liked and disliked foods. Food Quality and Preference, 26, pp. 196--203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Crofton, E.C., Botinestean, C., Fenelon, M., & Gallagher, E. (2019) Potential applications for virtual and augmented reality technologies in sensory science. Innovate Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 56, pp. 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Xu, Y., Hamid, N., Shepherd, D., Kantono, K., & Spence, C. (2019) Changes in flavor, emotion, and electrophysiological measurements when consuming chocolate ice cream in different eating environments. Food Quality and Preference. 77, pp: 191--205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Meiselman, H.L., Johnson, J.L., Reeve, W., & Crouch, J.E. (2000) Demonstrations on the influence of the eating environment in food acceptance. Appetite, 35 (3), pp. 231--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Garcia-Segovia, P., Harrington, R.J., & Seo, H.S. (2015) Influences of table setting and eating location on food acceptance and intake. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Krishna, A. An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the sense to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 2012, 332--351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalton, P., Doolittle, M., & Breslin, PA. (2002) Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors. Nat. Neurosci. 5: 3, pp. 199--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Kenedy, O., Stewart-Knox, B., Mitchell, P., & Thutnham, D. (2004) The influence of context upon consumer sensory evaluation of chicken-meat quality. British Food Journal, 106 (3), pp. 158--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Carulli, M., Bordegoni, M., Cugini, U. (2016) Integrating Scents Simulation in Virtual Reality Multisensory Environment fro Industrial Products Evaluation, Computer-aided design & applications, 13 (3) pp. 320--328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Amores, J., and Maes, P. (2017) Essence: Olfactory Interfaces for Unconscious Influence of Mood and Cognitive Performance, in Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY. Pp: 28--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Yamada, T., Yokoyama, S., Tanikawa, T., Koichi, H., & Hirose, M. (2006) Wearable Olfactory Display: Using Odor in Outdoor Environment in Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR'06). March 25-29 (Alexandria, VA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakamoto, T. (2013). Human Olfactory Displays and Interfaces: Odor Sensing and Presentation, Information Science referenceGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Risso, P., Covarrubias, M., Bordegoni, M., Gallace, A. (2018) Development and Testing of a Small-Size Olfactometer for the Perception of Food and Beverages in Humans. Front. Digit. Humanit. 5:7, pp. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design of A Virtual Reality Scenario and Scent Generator for Sensory Training

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ISCSIC 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Control
      November 2020
      241 pages
      ISBN:9781450388894
      DOI:10.1145/3440084

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 February 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ISCSIC 2020 Paper Acceptance Rate42of97submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate192of401submissions,48%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader