skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3026004acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Essence: Olfactory Interfaces for Unconscious Influence of Mood and Cognitive Performance

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The sense of smell is perhaps the most pervasive of all senses, but it is also one of the least understood and least exploited in HCI. We present Essence, the first olfactory computational necklace that can be remotely controlled through a smartphone and can vary the intensity and frequency of the released scent based on biometric or contextual data. This paper discusses the role of smell in designing pervasive systems that affect one's mood and cognitive performance while being asleep or awake. We present a set of applications for this type of technology as well as the implementation of the olfactory display and the supporting software. We also discuss the results of an initial test of the prototype that show the robustness and usability of Essence while wearing it for long periods of time in multiple environments.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn4482.mp4

mp4

18.9 MB

pn4482p.mp4

mp4

2.3 MB

p28-amores.mp4

mp4

252.4 MB

References

  1. 2016. Love Scent. (2016). http://love-scent.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2016. Raw Chemistry. (2016). https://rawchemistry.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Judith Amores. 2016. Essence : Olfactory interfaces for unconscious influence of mood and cognitive performance. Master's thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106061Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Aromajoin. 2016. AromaShooter. (2016). https://aromajoin.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Arzi, Y. Holtzman, P. Samnon, N. Eshel, E. Harel, and N. Sobel. 2014. Olfactory Aversive Conditioning during Sleep Reduces Cigarette-Smoking Behavior. Journal of Neuroscience 34, 46 (2014), 15382--15393. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2291--14.2014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Anat Arzi, Limor Shedlesky, Mor Ben-Shaul, Khitam Nasser, Arie Oksenberg, Ilana S Hairston, and Noam Sobel. 2012. Humans can learn new information during sleep. Nature neuroscience 15, 10 (2012), 1460-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3193 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Benedict Carey. 2014. How We Learn: The Surprising Truth About When, Where, and Why It Happens. Random House, New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dipesh et al. Chaudhury. 2010. Olfactory Bulb Habituation to Odor Stimuli. Behavioral neuroscience (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Parsani R. Pandey A. V. Roman X. Cheok-A. D. Choi, Y. 2013. Light perfume: a fashion accessory for synchronization of nonverbal communication. In Leonardo. 439--444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yongsoon Choi, Adrian David Cheok, Xavier Roman, The Anh Nguyen, Kenichi Sugimoto, and Veronica Halupka. 2011. Sound Perfume: Designing a Wearable Sound and Fragrance Media for Face-to-face Interpersonal Interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 8 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2071423.2071428 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. H. B. de Groot, M. A. M. Smeets, A. Kaldewaij, M. J. A. Duijndam, and G. R. Semin. 2012. Chemosignals Communicate Human Emotions. Psychological Science 23, 11 (2012), 1417--1424. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797612445317 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. H. B. de Groot, M. A. M. Smeets, M. J. Rowson, P. J. Bulsing, C. G. Blonk, J. E. Wilkinson, and G. R. Semin. 2015. A Sniff of Happiness. Psychological Science (2015), 0956797614566318--. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614566318 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Diffus Design. 2009. Climate Dress. (2009). http://www.diffus.dk/climate-dress/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Susanne Diekelmann and Jan Born. 2010. The memory function of sleep. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 11, 2 (2010), 114--26. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2762 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dina Marie Zemke, Stowe Shoemaker. 2008. A Social Atmosphere: Ambient Scent's Effect on Social Interaction. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Empatica. 2016. E4 Wristband. (2016). http://www.smell.dating/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kleinbard Jeff. Erdelyi, Matthew H. 1978. Has Ebbinghaus decayed with time? The growth of recall (hypermnesia) over days . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory (1978), 275--289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Camille Ferdenzi, S. Craig Roberts, Annett Schirmer, Sylvain Delplanque, Sezen Cekic, Christelle Porcherot, Isabelle Cayeux, David Sander, and Didier Grandjean. 2013. Variability of Affective Responses to Odors: Culture, Gender, and Olfactory Knowledge. Chemical Senses 38, 2 (2013), 175--186. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjs083 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Camille et al. Ferdenzi. 2016. Androstadienone's influence on the perception of facial and vocal attractiveness is not sex specific. Psychoneuroendocrinology 66 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Inc. with Donat-Pierre Luigi. Jacki Morie. Fabricated by Anthrotronix. 2005. ICT Scent Collar. (2005). http://ict.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/212/03/ ScentCollarBrochure1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Daniel. Kahneman. 2012. Thinking, Fast and Slow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. E. Amores J. Leigh S. W. Benavides-X. Maes P. Ishii H. Kao, C. Dreshaj. 2015. clayodor : Retrieving Scents through the Manipulation of Malleable Material. TEI 2015 (2015). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2688814 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. "Jofish." Kaye. 2001. Symbolic Olfactory Display. Master's thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. "Jofish." Kaye. 2004. Making Scents: Aromatic output for HCI. Magazine Interactions. Volume 11, Issue 1 (2004), 48--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Thalma Lobel. 2014. Sensation: The New Science of Physical Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kevin Lynch. 2015. Subliminal: How Your Unconscious Mind Rules Your Behavior, by Leonard Mlodinow (Vintage Books, 2013). Journal of Consciousness Studies 22, 9--10 (2015), 229--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rachel S. Herz Mary A. Carskadon. 2004. Minimal olfactory perception during sleep: why odor alarms will not work for humans. Sleep (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lucy McRae. 2011. Swallowable Parfum. (2011). http://swallowableparfum.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Tiffany Field Maria Hernandez-reif Saul Schanberg Cynthia Kuhn Mary Galamaga Virginia McAdam Robert Galamaga Miguel A. Diego, Nancy Aaron Jones. 1998. Aromatherapy positively affects mood, EEG patterns of alertness and math computations. International Journal of Neuroscience (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. K Mizuno, N Mizuno, T Shinohara, and M Noda. 2004. Mother-infant skin-to-skin contact after delivery results in early recognition of own mother's milk odour. Acta Paediatrica (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Muse. 2016. Muse, the brain sensing headband. (2016). http://www.choosemuse.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Smiljana Mutic, Valentina Parma, Yvonne F. Brünner, and Jessica Freiherr. 2016. You smell dangerous: Communicating fight responses through human chemosignals of aggression. Chemical Senses 41, 1 (2016), 35--43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjv058 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Marianna Obrist, Alexandre N Tuch, and Kasper Hornbaek. 2014. Opportunities for Odor: Experiences with Smell and Implications for Technology. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2014), 2843--2852. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Onotes. 2015. Ophone. (2015). http://www.onotes.com/ophone2/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Nimesha Ranasinghe, Kasun Karunanayaka, Adrian David Cheok, Owen Noel Newton Fernando, Hideaki Nii, and Ponnampalam Gopalakrishnakone. 2011. Digital Taste and Smell Communication. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Body Area Networks (BodyNets '11). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), ICST, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium, 78--84. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2318776.2318795Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. William H. Redd, Sharon L. Manne, Bruce Peters, Paul B. Jacobsen, and Hilary Schmidt. 1994. Fragrance administration to reduce anxiety during MR imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 4, 4 (jul 1994), 623--626. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880040419 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Regina M. Sullivan, Donald A. Wilson, Nadine Ravel, Anne-Marie Mouly., and Bryan Raudenbush. 2015. Olfactory memory networks: form emotional learning to social behaviors. Front. Behav. Neuroscience 17 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Scentee. 2013. (2013). http://www.scentee.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Shannon Barker, Palema Grayhem, Jerrod Koon, Jessica Perkins, Allison Whalen and Bryan Raudenbush. 2003. Improved Performance on Clerical Tasks Associated with Administration of Peppermint Odor. Perceptual and Motor Skills (2003), 1007--1010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Robert Stickgold. 2012. To sleep, perchance to learn. Nature 15, 10 (2012), 1322--1323. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/384037a0 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Jenny Tillotson and Adeline. Andre. 2005. Smart Second Skin. University of the arts London. (2005). http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/5570/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. R. Strong W. Gaver. 1996. Feather, scent, and shaker: Supporting simple intimacy. Proceedings of CSCW'96 (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Claus Wedekind, Thomas Seebeck, Florence Bettens, and Alexander J. Paepke. 1995. MHC-Dependent Mate Preferences in Humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 260, 1359 (1995), 245--249. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0087 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Anouk Wipprecht and Niccolo Casas. 2012. Smoke Dress. (2012). http://www.niccolocasas.com/SMOKE-DRESS/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Tomoya Yamada, Satoshi Yokoyama, Tomohiro Tanikawa, Koichi Hirota, and Michitaka Hirose. 2006. Wearable Olfactory Display: Using Odor in Outdoor Environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality (VR '06). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 199--206. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VR.2006.147 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Essence: Olfactory Interfaces for Unconscious Influence of Mood and Cognitive Performance

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader