skip to main content
10.1145/3374920.3375290acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Aura: maton: A Wearable Olfactory Display for Immersive Scentscapes

Published:09 February 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Aura:maton is a networked, olfactory wearable worn by one dancer in an immersive performance that allows audience members to explore ephemeral scent worlds [Fig. 2]. The performance evokes the memory of the smell of fresh rain on dry earth, known as petrichor. A dancer wears an IoT-connected, olfactory-emitting wearable as they navigate a room-scale environment, projecting dynamic olfactory display. Biofeedback through electroencephalography (EEG) sensing enables the dancer to develop direct communication with each of the five scent vials on a custom-made leather harness scent 'minilab'. The minilab is coded to playback the electrical activity of the brain and choreograph an autonomous symphony of scent-induced trails, as the dancer's scented memories drift through the audience.

References

  1. Judith Amores and Pattie Maes. 2017. Essence: Olfactory interfaces for unconscious influence of mood and cognitive performance. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York, NY, 28--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. David Dobbelstein, Steffen Herrdum, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. inScent: A wearable olfactory display as an amplification for mobile notifications. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM Press, New York, NY, 130--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Joanne Entwistle. 2015. The fashioned body: Fashion, dress and social theory. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Rachel Herz. 2007. The scent of desire: Discovering our enigmatic sense of smell. William Morrow New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Joseph Jofish Kaye. 2004. Making Scents: aromatic output for HCI. Interactions. ACM Press, New York, NY, 11, 1: 48--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruno Latour. 2004. How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & society 10, 2--3: 205--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yuri Masaoka, Haruko Sugiyama, Atsushi Katayama, Mitsuyoshi Kashiwagi, and Ikuo Homma. 2012. Remembering the past with slow breathing associated with activity in the parahippocampus and amygdala. Neuroscience letters 521, 2: 98--103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Caroline McMillan. 2019. Envisioning Value-Rich Design for IoT Wearables. https://doi.org/10.17028/rd.lboro.9724637.v1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Douglas Quenqua. 2015. Art for the Knowing Nose. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/07/science/art-for-the-knowing-nose.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradley Quinn. 2012. Fashion futures. Merrell London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Catherine Rouby, Benoist Schaal, Danièle Dubois, Rémi Gervais, and André Holley. 2002. Olfaction, taste, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gabi Schaffner. 2019. Frequenzen und Düfte. Datscha Radio. Retrieved from https://datscharadio.de/blog/2019/08/resume-frequenzen-und-dufte/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenny Tillotson. 2009. Scentsory Design: A "Holistic" Approach to Fashion as a Vehicle to Deliver Emotional Well-being. Fashion Practice 1, 1: 33--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. CL Verbeek. 2012. A multi-sensorial perception of space: Olfactoscape by Maki Ueda.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 2013. SMOKE DRESS. Retrieved from http://niccolocasas.com/smoke-dressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Refinery Smoke. Iris Van Herpen. 2008. Retrieved from https://www.irisvanherpen.com/haute-couture/refinery-smokeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Aura: maton: A Wearable Olfactory Display for Immersive Scentscapes

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '20: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      February 2020
      978 pages
      ISBN:9781450361071
      DOI:10.1145/3374920
      • General Chairs:
      • Elise van den Hoven,
      • Lian Loke,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Orit Shaer,
      • Jelle van Dijk,
      • Andrew Kun

      Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 February 2020

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate37of132submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader