skip to main content
10.1145/3154862.3154881acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding self-reflection: how people reflect on personal data through visual data exploration

Published:23 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Rapid advancements in consumer technologies enable people to collect a wide range of personal data. With a proper means for people to ask questions and explore their data, longitudinal data feeds from multiple self-tracking tools pose great opportunities to foster deep self-reflection. However, most self-tracking tools lack support for self-reflection beyond providing simple feedback. Our overarching goal is to support self-trackers in reflecting on their data and gaining rich insights through visual data exploration. As a first step toward the goal, we built a web-based application called Visualized Self, and conducted an in-lab think-aloud study (N = 11) to examine how people reflect on their personal data and what types of insights they gain throughout the reflection. We discuss lessons learned from studying with Visualized Self, and suggest directions for designing visual data exploration tools for fostering self-reflection.

References

  1. Apple HealthKit. https://developer.apple.com/healthkit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Apple ResearchKit & CareKit. http://www.apple.com/researchkit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumer, E. P. (2015). Reflective informatics: conceptual dimensions for designing technologies of reflection. Proc. CHI '15, 585--594. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Baumer, E. P., Khovanskaya, V., Matthews, M., Reynolds, L., Schwanda Sosik, V., & Gay, G. (2014). Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design. Proc. DIS '14, 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bell, G. (2001). A Personal Digital Store, Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 86--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bentley, F., Tollmar, K., Stephenson, P., Levy, L., Jones, B., Robertson, S., ... & Wilson, J. (2013). Health Mashups: Presenting statistical patterns between well-being data and context in natural language to promote behavior change. ACM TOCHI, 20(5), 30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Choe, E. K., Lee, B., & schraefel, m. c. (2015). Characterizing visualization insights from quantified-selfers' personal data presentations. IEEE CG&A, 35(4), 28--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Choe, E. K., Lee, N. B., Lee, B., Pratt, W., & Kientz, J. A. (2014). Understanding quantified selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data. Proc. CHI '14, 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Consolvo, S., Klasnja, P., McDonald, D. W., Avrahami, D., Froehlich, J., LeGrand, L., ... & Landay, J. A. (2008). Flowers or a robot army?: encouraging awareness & activity with personal, mobile displays. Proc. UbiComp '08, 54--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Epstein, D., Cordeiro, F., Bales, E., Fogarty, J., & Munson, S. (2014). Taming data complexity in life-logs: exploring visual cuts of personal informatics data. Proc. DIS '14, 667--676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Epstein, D. A., Ping, A., Fogarty, J., & Munson, S. A. (2015). A lived informatics model of personal informatics. Proc. UbiComp '15, 731--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Exist. https://exist.io.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan, C., Forlizzi, J., & Dey, A. K. (2012). A spark of activity: exploring informative art as visualization for physical activity. Proc. UbiComp '12, 81--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fawcett, T. (2015). Mining the quantified self: personal knowledge discovery as a challenge for data science. Big Data, 3(4), 249--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fleck, R. (2012). Rating reflection on experience: A case study of teachers' and tutors' reflection around images. Interacting with computers, 24(6), 439--449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Fluxtream. https://fluxtream.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Ostergren, M., Ramanathan, S., Peterson, J., Wragg, I., ... & Landay, J. A. (2012). The design and evaluation of prototype eco-feedback displays for fixture-level water usage data. Proc. CHI '12, 2367--2376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gemmell, J., Bell, G., & Lueder, R. (2006). MyLife-Bits: a personal database for everything. CACM, 49(1), 88--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Google Fit. https://www.google.com/fit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Grammel, L., Tory, M., & Storey, M. (2010). How information visualization novices construct visualizations. IEEE TVCG (InfoVis '10), 16(6), 943--952. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hsieh, C. K., Tangmunarunkit, H., Alquaddoomi, F., Jenkins, J., Kang, J., Ketcham, C., ... & Estrin, D. (2013). Lifestreams: A modular sense-making toolset for identifying important patterns from everyday life. Proc. SenSys '13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277--1288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang, D., Tory, M., Aseniero, B. A., Bartram, L., Bateman, S., Carpendale, S., Tang, A., & Woodbury, R. (2015). Personal visualization and personal visual analytics. IEEE TVCG, 21(3), 420--433.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, S. L., & Kelly, R. (2016). Finding interesting correlations in multi-faceted personal informatics systems. Ext. Abstracts CHI '16, 3099--3106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kim, Y. H., Jeon, J. H., Choe, E. K., Lee, B., Kim, K., & Seo, J. (2016). TimeAware: leveraging framing effects to enhance personal productivity. Proc. CHI '16, 272--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lazar, A., Koehler, C., Tanenbaum, J., & Nguyen, D. H. (2015). Why we use and abandon smart devices. Proc. UbiComp '15, 635--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Li, I., Dey, A., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. Proc. CHI '10, 557--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Li, I., Dey, A. K., & Forlizzi, J. (2011). Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. Proc. UbiComp '11, 405--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Lin, J. J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., & Strub, H. B. (2006). Fish'n'Steps: encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. Proc. UbiComp '06, 261--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Microsoft HealthVault. https://www.healthvault.com/us/en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ploderer, B., Reitberger, W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. (2014). Social interaction and reflection for behaviour change. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(7), 1667--1676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Quantified Self. http://www.quantifiedself.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ren, D., Brehmer, M., Lee, B., Höllere, T., & Choe, E.K. (2017). ChartAccent: Annotation for Data-Driven Storytelling. PacificVis '17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. RescueTime. https://www.rescuetime.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., & Chalmers, M. C. (2014). Personal tracking as lived informatics. Proc. CHI '14, 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Sharmin, M., Raij, A., Epstien, D., Nahum-Shani, I., Beck, J. G., Vhaduri, S., ... & Kumar, S. (2015). Visualization of time-series sensor data to inform the design of just-in-time adaptive stress interventions. Proc. UbiComp '15, 505--516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Thieme, A., Comber, R., Miebach, J., Weeden, J., Kraemer, N., Lawson, S., & Olivier, P. (2012). We've bin watching you: designing for reflection and social persuasion to promote sustainable lifestyles. Proc. CHI '12, 2337--2346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Thudt, A., Lee, B., Choe, E.K., & Carpendale, S. (2017). Expanding research methods for a realistic understanding of personal visualization. IEEE CG&A, 37(2), 12--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Zenobase. https://zenobase.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PervasiveHealth '17: Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
    May 2017
    503 pages
    ISBN:9781450363631
    DOI:10.1145/3154862

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate55of116submissions,47%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader