skip to main content
10.1145/2750858.2804250acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A lived informatics model of personal informatics

Published:07 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Current models of how people use personal informatics systems are largely based in behavior change goals. They do not adequately characterize the integration of self-tracking into everyday life by people with varying goals. We build upon prior work by embracing the perspective of lived informatics to propose a new model of personal informatics. We examine how lived informatics manifests in the habits of self-trackers across a variety of domains, first by surveying 105, 99, and 83 past and present trackers of physical activity, finances, and location and then by interviewing 22 trackers regarding their lived informatics experiences. We develop a model characterizing tracker processes of deciding to track and selecting a tool, elaborate on tool usage during collection, integration, and reflection as components of tracking and acting, and discuss the lapsing and potential resuming of tracking. We use our model to surface underexplored challenges in lived informatics, thus identifying future directions for personal informatics design and research.

References

  1. Bandura, A. Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation. J Organ Behav Hum Dec, 50 (1991), 248--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Baumer, E. P. S., Khovanskaya, V., Matthews, M., Reynolds, L., Sosik, V. S., and Gay, G. Reviewing Reflection: On the Use of Reflection in Interactive System Design. DIS 2014, 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bentley, F., Tollmar, K., Stephenson, P., Levy, L., Jones, B., Robertson, S., Price, E., Catrambone, R., and Wilson, J. Health Mashups: Presenting Statistical Patterns between Wellbeing Data and Context in Natural Language to Promote Behavior Change. TOCHI 20, 5 (2013), 1--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bentley, F. and Tollmar, K. The Power of Mobile Notifications to Increase Wellbeing Logging Behavior. CHI 2013, 1095--1098. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., and Lenz, G. S. Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20, (2012), 351--368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Choe, E. K., Lee, N. B., Lee, B., Pratt, W., and Kientz, J. A. Understanding Quantified-Selfers' Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data. CHI 2014, 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Choe, E. K. Designing Self-Monitoring Technology to Promote Data Capture and Reflection. PhD Dissertation. The Information School, University of Washington, Seattle Washington.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., and Landay, J. A. Design Requirements for Technologies that Encourage Physical Activity. CHI 2006, 457--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Consolvo, S., Smith, I. E., Matthews, T., LaMarca, A., and Tabert, J. Location Disclosure to Social Relations: Why, When, & What People Want to Share. CHI 2005, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cordeiro, F., Bales, E., Cherry, E., and Fogarty, J. Rethinking the Mobile Food Journal: Exploring Opportunities for Lightweight Photo-Based Capture. CHI 2015, 3207--3216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cordeiro, F., Epstein, D. A., Thomaz, E., Bales, E., Jagannathan, A. K., Abowd, G. D., and Fogarty, J. Barriers and Negative Nudges: Exploring Challenges in Food Journaling. CHI 2015, 1159--1162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Curmi, F., Ferrario, M. A., Southern, J., and Whittle, J. HeartLink: Open Broadcast of Live Biometric Data to Social Networks. CHI 2013, 1749--1758. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dawe, M. Desperately Seeking Simplicity: How Young Adults with Cognitive Disabilities and Their Families Adopt Assistive Technologies. CHI 2006, 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Downs, J. S., Holbrook, M. B., Sheng, S., and Cranor, L. F. Are your Participants Gaming the System? Screening Mechanical Turk Workers. CHI 2010, 2399--2402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Epstein, D. A., Cordeiro, F., Bales, E., Fogarty, J., and Munson, S. A. Taming Data Complexity in Lifelogs: Exploring Visual Cuts of Personal Informatics Data. DIS 2014, 667--676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fritz, T., Huang, E. M., Murphy, G. C., and Zimmermann, T. Persuasive Technology in the Real World: A Study of Long-Term Use of Activity Sensing Devices for Fitness. CHI 2014, 487--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hodges, S., Williams, L., Berry, E., Izadi, S., Srinivasan, J., Butler, A., Smyth, G., Kapur, N., and Wood, K. SenseCam: A Retrospective Memory Aid. UbiComp 2006, 177--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Humphreys, L. Mobile Social Networks and Social Practice: A Case Study of Dodgeball. J Compu-Mediat Comm 13, (2007), 341--360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kay, M., Morris, D., schraefel, m.c., and Kientz, J. A. There's No Such Thing as Gaining a Pound: Reconsidering the Bathroom Scale User Interface. UbiComp 2013, 401--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kaye, J. J., Mccuistion, M., Gulotta, R., and Shamma, D. A. Money Talks: Tracking Personal Finances. CHI 2014, 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Li, I., Dey, A., and Forlizzi, J. A Stage-Based Model of Personal Informatics Systems. CHI 2010, 557--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Li, I., Dey, A. K. A., and Forlizzi, J. Understanding My Data, Myself: Supporting Self-Reflection with Ubicomp Technologies. UbiComp 2011, 405--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lin, J. J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., and Strub, H. B. Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game. UbiComp 2006, 261--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Lindqvist, J., Cranshaw, J., Wiese, J., Hong, J., and Zimmerman, J. I'm the Mayor of My House: Examining Why People Use Foursquare-A Social-Driven Location Sharing Application. CHI 2011, 2409--2418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Maitland, J. and Chalmers, M. Designing for Peer Involvement in Weight Management. CHI 2011, 315--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Munson, S. A. and Consolvo, S. Exploring Goal-Setting, Rewards, Self-Monitoring, and Sharing to Motivate Physical Activity. PervasiveHealth 2012, 25--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Munson, S. A., Krupka, E., Richardson, C., and Resnick, P. Effects of Public Commitments and Accountability in a Technology-Supported Physical Activity Intervention. CHI 2015, 1135--1144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Newman, M., Lauterbach, D., Munson, S. A., Resnick, P., and Morris, M. E. "It's not that I don't have problems, I'm just not putting them on Facebook": Challenges and Opportunities in Using Online Social Networks for Health. CSCW 2011, 341--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Olson, P. Wearable Tech is Plugging into Health Insurance. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2014/06/19/wearable-tech-health-insurance/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Page, X. and Kobsa, A. Navigating the Social Terrain with Google Latitude. iConference 2010, 174--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Powers, W. T. Behavior: The Control of Perception. Benchmark Publications, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Prochaska, J. O. and Velcier, W. F. The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change. American Journal of Health Promotion 12, 1 (1997), 38--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Rahman, T., Adams, A. T., Zhang, M., Cherry, E., Zhou, B., Peng, H., and Choudhury, T. BodyBeat: A Mobile System for Sensing Non-Speech Body Sounds. MobiSys 2014, 2--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., and Chalmers, M. Personal Tracking as Lived Informatics. CHI 2014, 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Schoenebeck, S. Y. Giving up Twitter for Lent: How and Why We Take Breaks from Social Media. CHI 2014, 773--782. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Schön, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, I., Consolvo, S., Lamarca, A., Hightower, J., Scott, J., Sohn, T., Hughes, J., Iachello, G., and Abowd, G. D. Social Disclosure of Place: From Location Technology to Communication Practices. Pervasive 2005, 134--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Tang, K. P., Lin, J., Hong, J. I., Siewiorek, D. P., and Sadeh, N. Rethinking Location Sharing: Exploring the Implications of Social-Driven vs. Purpose-Driven Location Sharing. UbiComp 2010, 85--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Thomaz, E., Zhang, C., Essa, I., and Abowd, G. D. Inferring Meal Eating Activities in Real World Settings from Ambient Sounds: A Feasibility Study. IUI 2015, 427--431. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Toscos, T., Faber, A., Connelly, K., and Upoma, A. M. Encouraging Physical Activity in Teens: Can Technology Help Reduce Barriers to Physical Activity in Adolescent Girls? PervasiveHealth 2008, 218--221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Whooley, M., Gray, K., Ploderer, B., and Gray, K. On the Integration of Self-tracking Data amongst Quantified Self Members. HCI 2014, 151--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A lived informatics model of personal informatics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
      September 2015
      1302 pages
      ISBN:9781450335744
      DOI:10.1145/2750858

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 September 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UbiComp '15 Paper Acceptance Rate101of394submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader