skip to main content
10.1145/2786567.2794336acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Investigating The Role of Task Engagement in Mobile Interruptibility

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Context-awareness of mobile phones is a cornerstone of recent efforts in automatic determination of user interruptibility. Modalities such as a user's location, her physical activity, time of day, can be used in machine learning models to infer if a user is going to welcome an incoming notification or not. However, the success of context-aware interruptibility systems questions the existing theory of interruptibility, that is based on the internal state of the user, not her surroundings. In this work we examine the role of a user's internal context, defined by her engagement in the current task, on the sentiment towards an interrupting mobile notification. We collect and analyse real-world data on interruptibility of twenty subjects over two weeks, and show that the internal state indeed impacts user interruptibility.

References

  1. James Fogarty, Scott E. Hudson, Christopher G. Atkeson, Daniel Avrahami, Jodi Forlizzi, Sara Kiesler, Johnny C. Lee, and Jie Yang. 2005. Predicting Human Interruptibility with Sensors. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 12, 1 (March 2005), 119--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Joyce Ho and Stephen S. Intille. 2005. Using Context-Aware Computing to Reduce the Perceived Burden of Interruptions from Mobile Devices. In CHI'05. Portland, OR, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Eric Horvitz and Johnson Apacible. 2003. Learning and Reasoning about Interruption. In ICMI'03. Vancouver, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Eric Horvitz, Johnson Apacible, and Muru Subramani. 2005. Balancing awareness and interruption: Investigation of notification deferral policies. In User Modeling 2005. Springer, 433--437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shamsi T Iqbal and Brian P Bailey. 2006. Leveraging characteristics of task structure to predict the cost of interruption. In CHI'06. Montreal, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Veljko Pejovic and Mirco Musolesi. 2014. InterruptMe: designing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive applications. In UbiComp'14. Seattle, WA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Martin Pielot, Rodrigo de Oliveira, Haewoon Kwak, and Nuria Oliver. 2014. Didn't You See My Message? Predicting Attentiveness to Mobile Instant Messages. In CHI'14. Toronto, ON, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dario D Salvucci and Niels A Taatgen. 2010. The multitasking mind. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G. H. Ter Hofte. 2007. Xensible interruptions from your mobile phone. In Mobile HCI'07. Singapore. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Investigating The Role of Task Engagement in Mobile Interruptibility

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '15: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct
      August 2015
      697 pages
      ISBN:9781450336536
      DOI:10.1145/2786567

      Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 August 2015

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader