skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675200acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Taking our Time: Chronic Illness and Time-Based Objects in Families

Published:28 February 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study examined the use of time-based objects by patients and their families to manage chronic illnesses at home. Calendar systems and medication containers, the main types of time-based objects studied, were used as part of two family-based collaborative work practices: 1) prompting health management activities, and 2) safeguarding these activities. Additionally, these artifacts were part of two social interaction patterns that managed emotional intimacy: 1) expressing support, and 2) hiding and disguising illness. Accordingly, home-based illness management may be more collaborative than previously recognized. Moreover, through their interactive incorporation into family life, time-based objects are laden with psychosocial significance. Breakdowns in temporal support were also evident, and were accompanied by: missed medication events; rationing of medications; medication errors; and difficulties with preparation for medical appointments. We propose novel artifact designs to better support patients and their families in managing the temporal aspects of chronic illness together.

References

  1. About GlowCap. Vitality. http://www.vitality.net/glowcaps.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardram, J. Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities. In Proc. CSCW 1998, ACM Press (1998), 89--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bauer, A. M., Thielke, S. M., Katon, W., Unützer, J. and Areán, P. Aligning health information technologies with effective service delivery models to improve chronic disease care. Preventive Medicine 66, (2014), 167--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Birth, K. Objects of time: How things shape temporality. Palgrave Macmillan, NY (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Blumenthal, D. and Tavenner, M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. New England Journal of Medicine 363, 6 (2010), 501--504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bødker, S. and Grönvall, E. Calendars: Time coordination and overview in families and beyond. In Proc. ECSCW 2013, Springer (2013), 63--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Borchard, A., Schwappach, D. L., Barbir, A. and Bezzola, P. A systematic review of the effectiveness, compliance, and critical factors for implementation of safety checklists in surgery. Annals of Surgery 256, 6 (2012), 925--933.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bossen, C., Christensen, L. R., Grönvall, E. and Vestergaard, L. S. CareCoor: Augmenting the coordination of cooperative home care work. International Journal of Medical Informatics 82, 5 (2013), e189-e199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Boutwell, A., Silber, S., Nguyen, D., Ryan, L. and Melville, L. Post-Acute care: What does it have to do with me? Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports 2, 1 (2014), 9--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Browne, J. L., Ventura, A., Mosely, K. and Speight, J. "I call it the blame and shame disease": A qualitative study about perceptions of social stigma surrounding type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open 3, 11 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Charmaz, K. Constructing grounded theory: 2nd Edition. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Charmaz, K. Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Chenard, C. The impact of stigma on the self-care behaviors of HIV-positive gay men striving for normalcy. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care 18, 3 (2007), 23--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Colineau, N. and Paris, C. Motivating reflection about health within the family: The use of goal setting and tailored feedback. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 21, 4--5 (2011), 341--376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Collier, J. and Collier, M. Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque (1986).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. Managing chronic illness at home: Three lines of work. Qualitative Sociology 8, 3 (1985), 224--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T. and Mariani, J. Informing the development of calendar systems for domestic use. In Proc. ECSCW 2003, Springer (2003), 119--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Crabtree, A. and Rodden, T. Domestic routines and design for the home. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 13, 2 (2004), 191--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Digital Health Feedback System. Proteus Digital Health. http://www.proteus.com/technology/digitalhealth-feedback-system.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dix, A. Computer supported cooperative work: A framework. In D. Rosenberg and C. Hutchison (eds.) Design issues in CSCW, Springer, NY (1994), 926.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Dourish, P. Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Elliot, K., Neustaedter, C. and Greenberg, S. Time, ownership and awareness: The value of contextual locations in the home. UbiComp 2005: Ubiquitous Computing Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3660, (2005), 251--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. England, K. Home, work and the shifting geographies of care. Ethics, Place & Environment 13, 2 (2010), 131150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Eschler, J., Kendall, L., O'Leary, K., Vizer, L., Lozano, P., McClure, J., Pratt, W. and Ralston, J. Shared calendars for home health management. In Proc. CSCW 2015, ACM Press (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Flaherty, M. G. The textures of time: Agency and temporal experience. Temple University Press, Philadelphia (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Fox, S. and Jones, S. The social life of health information, 2011. Pew Research Center & California HealthCare Foundation, Washington, DC (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldzweig, C. L., Orshansky, G., Paige, N. M., Towfigh, A. A., Haggstrom, D. A., Miake-Lye, I., Beroes, J. M. and Shekelle, P. G. Electronic patient portals: Evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 159, 10 (2013), 677--687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Gomes, B., Calanzani, N. and Higginson, I. J. Reversal of the British trends in place of death: Time series analysis 2004--2010. Palliative Medicine 26, 2 (2012), 102--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Grimes, A. and Brush, A. Life scheduling to support multiple social roles. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 821--824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Grimes, A., Tan, D. and Morris, D. Toward technologies that support family reflections on health. In Proc. GROUP 2009, ACM Press (2009), 311--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Hansen, S. M., Tolle, S. W. and Martin, D. P. Factors associated with lower rates of in-hospital death. Journal of Palliative Medicine 5, 5 (2002), 677--685.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Hartel, J. and Thomson, L. Visual approaches and photography for the study of immediate information space. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62, 11 (2011), 2214--2224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Haycock-Stuart, E. and Kean, S. Shifting the balance of care? A qualitative study of policy implementation in community nursing. Journal of Nursing Management 21, 6 (2013), 867--877.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. How to Help the Community and Provide Caregiver Support. Lotsa Helping Hands. http://www.lotsahelpinghands.com/how-it-works/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jeffries, A. Smart pill bottle measures meds using touchscreen technology. The Verge. http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/8/3473218/smartpill-bottle-adheretech-capacitance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Jewitt, C. and Van Leeuwen, T. The handbook of visual analysis. SAGE, London (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Khan, D. U., Ananthanarayan, S., Le, A. T., Schaefbauer, C. L. and Siek, K. A. Designing mobile snack application for low socioeconomic status families. In Proc. PervasiveHealth 2012, IEEE (2012), 57--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Klasnja, P., Civan Hartzler, A., Unruh, K. T. and Pratt, W. Blowing in the wind: Unanchored patient information work during cancer care. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Klasnja, P., Hartzler, A., Powell, C., Phan, G. and Pratt, W. Health weaver mobile: Designing a mobile tool for managing personal health information during cancer care. In Proc. AMIA Symposium 2010, AMIA (2010), 392--396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Klasnja, P., Hartzler, A., Powell, C. and Pratt, W. Supporting cancer patients' unanchored health information management with mobile technology. In Proc. AMIA Symposium 2011, AMIA (2011), 732--741.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Kramarow, E., Lentzner, H., Rooks, R., Weeks, J. and Saydah, S. Health, USA, 1999 with health and aging chartbook. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, USA (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee, M. L. and Dey, A. K. Real-time feedback for improving medication taking. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014), 2259--2268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Lee, R., Kochman, A. and Sikkema, K. Internalized stigma among people living with HIV-AIDS. AIDS and Behavior 6, 4 (2002), 309--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. McCoy, L. Time, self and the medication day: A closer look at the everyday work of "adherence". Sociology of Health & Illness 31, 1 (2009), 128--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Meeussen, K., Van Den Block, L., Echteld, M. A., Boffin, N., Bilsen, J., Van Casteren, V., Abarshi, E., Donker, G., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. and Deliens, L. End-of-Life care and circumstances of death in patients dying as a result of cancer in Belgium and The Netherlands: A retrospective comparative study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 29, 32 (2011), 4327--4334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Moen, A. and Brennan, P. F. Health@ Home: the work of health information management in the household (HIMH): implications for consumer health informatics (CHI) innovations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 12, 6 (2005), 648--656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Neustaedter, C., Brush, A. and Greenberg, S. The calendar is crucial: Coordination and awareness through the family calendar. ACM Transactions on ComputerHuman Interaction 16, 1 (2009), Article No. 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Palen, L. Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Parker, K. and Patten, E. The sandwich generation: Rising financial burdens for middle-aged Americans. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Pink, S. Doing visual ethnography: Images, media, and representation in research. SAGE, London (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Pratt, W., Unruh, K., Civan, A. and Skeels, M. M. Personal health information management. Communications of the ACM 49, 1 (2006), 51--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Shekelle, P., Wachter, R., Pronovost, P., Schoelles, K., McDonald, K., Dy, S., Shojania, K., Reston, J., Berger, Z. and Johnsen, B. Evidence report/technology assessment - No. 211: Making health care safer II: An updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Stawarz, K., Cox, A. and Blandford, A. Don't forget your pill!: Designing effective medication reminder apps that support users' daily routines. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014), 2269--2278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Support for Your Health Journey. Caring Bridge. http://www.caringbridge.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Thayer, A., Bietz, M. J., Derthick, K. and Lee, C. P. I love you, let's share calendars: Calendar sharing as relationship work. In Proc. CSCW 2012, ACM Press (2012), 749--758. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Thoits, P. A. Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next? Journal of Health and Social Behavior 35, (1995), 53--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. UMLS: RxNorm. U.S. National Library of Medicine. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/rxnorm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Veinot, T. "A lot of people didn't have a chance to support us because we never told them" Stigma management, information poverty and HIV/AIDS information/help networks. In Proc. American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, Wiley (2009), 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Veinot, T. Power to the patient- A critical examination of patient empowerment discourses. In R. M. Harris, C. N. Wathen and S. Wyatt (eds.) Configuring health consumers: Health work and the imperative of personal responsibility, Palgrave Macmillan, NY (2010), 30--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Veinot, T. C. E., Kim, Y.-M. and Meadowbrooke, C. C. Health information behavior in families: Supportive or irritating? In Proc. American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, Wiley (2011), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson, D. M., Truman, C. D., Thomas, R., Fainsinger, R., Kovacs-Burns, K., Froggatt, K. and Justice, C. The rapidly changing location of death in Canada, 19942004. Social Science and Medicine 68, 10 (2009), 1752--1758.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Wood, W. and Neal, D. T. A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological Review 114, 4 (2007), 843--863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Wood, W., Tam, L. and Witt, M. G. Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88, 6 (2005), 918--933.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Taking our Time: Chronic Illness and Time-Based Objects in Families

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
          February 2015
          1956 pages
          ISBN:9781450329224
          DOI:10.1145/2675133

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 February 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate161of575submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CSCW '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader