skip to main content
10.1145/2371574.2371617acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Back to the app: the costs of mobile application interruptions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smartphone users might be interrupted while interacting with an application, either by intended or unintended circumstances. In this paper, we report on a large-scale observational study that investigated mobile application interruptions in two scenarios: (1) intended back and forth switching between applications and (2) unintended interruptions caused by incoming phone calls. Our findings reveal that these interruptions rarely happen (at most 10% of the daily application usage), but when they do, they may introduce a significant overhead (can delay completion of a task by up to 4 times). We conclude with a discussion of the results, their limitations, and a series of implications for the design of mobile phones.

References

  1. Benbunan-Fich, R., Adler, R. F., and Mavlanova, T. Measuring multitasking behavior with activity-based metrics. ACM TOCHI 18, 2 (2011), 7:1--7:22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Böhmer, M., Hecht, B., Schöning, J., Krüger, A., and Bauer, G. Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle - A large scale study on mobile application usage. In Proc. MobileHCI (2011), 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Iqbal, S. T., and Horvitz, E. Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: field study, analysis, and directions. In Proc. CHI (2007), 677--686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jin, J., and Dabbish, L. A. Self-interruption on the computer: a typology of discretionary task interleaving. In Proc. CHI (2009), 1799--1808. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Karlson, A. K., Iqbal, S. T., Meyers, B., Ramos, G., Lee, K., and Tang, J. C. Mobile taskflow in context: A screenshot study of smartphone usage. In Proc. CHI (2010), 2009--2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Roto, V., and Kuorelahti, J. Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. In Proc. CHI (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Salvucci, D. D. On reconstruction of task context after interruption. In Proc. CHI (2010), 89--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Salvucci, D. D., and Bogunovich, P. Multitasking and monotasking: The effects of mental workload on deferred task interruptions. In Proc. CHI (2010), 85--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Trafton, J. G., Altmann, E. M., Brock, D. P., and Mintz, F. E. Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 58, 5 (2003), 583--603. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Vaz De Melo, P. O. S., Akoglu, L., Faloutsos, C., and Loureiro, A. A. F. Surprising patterns for the call duration distribution of mobile phone users. In Proc. ECML PKDD (2010), 354--369. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Back to the app: the costs of mobile application interruptions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '12: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services
      September 2012
      468 pages
      ISBN:9781450311052
      DOI:10.1145/2371574

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 September 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader