skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753682acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The family window: the design and evaluation of a domestic media space

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Families have a strong need to connect with their loved ones over distance. However, most technologies do not provide the same feelings of connectedness that one feels from seeing remote family members. Hence our goal was to understand if a video connection, in the form of a media space, could help families feel more connected and what design factors would be critical for its success. To answer this, we designed a video media space called the Family Window and deployed it within the homes of two families for eight months and four families for five weeks. Our results show that always-on video can lead to an increase in feelings of connectedness by providing availability awareness and opportunities for sharing everyday life. However usage and value of such media spaces hinges on close-knit relationships and control over one's autonomy.

References

  1. Begole, J., Tang, J.C., Smith, R.B., and Yankelovich, N. Work Rhythms: Analyzing Visualizations of Awareness Histories of Distributed Groups. Proc CSCW '02, ACM Press (2002), 334--343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Boyle, M., Edwards, C., and Greenberg, S. The Effects of Filtered Video on Awareness and Privacy, Proc. CSCW'00, ACM Press (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Boyle, M., Neustaedter, C., and Greenberg, S. Privacy Factors in Video-based Media Spaces, Media Space: 20+ Years of Mediated Life, Springer (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brush, A.J., Inkpen, K., and Tee, K. SPARCS: Exploring Sharing Suggestions to Enhance Family Connectedness, Proc. CSCW 2008, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bly, S., Harrison, S., and Irwin, S. Media Spaces: Bringing Together a Video, Audio and Computing Environment, Communications of the ACM, 36(1), ACM Press (1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Conversy, S., Mackay, W., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., and Roussel, N. VideoProbe: Sharing Pictures of Everyday Life, Proc. IHM 2003, ACM Press (2003).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Coutaz, J., Bérard, F., Carraux, E., and Crowley, J. Early Experience with the Mediaspace CoMedi, IFIP Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction (EHCI 98), (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dourish, P. Culture and Control in a Media Space, Proc. ECSCW '93, Springer (1993), 125--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Elliot, K., Watson, M., Neustaedter, C., and Greenberg, S., Location-dependent information appliances for the home, Proc. Graphics Interface 2007, ACM (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fish, R., Kraut, R., and Chalfonte, B. The VideoWindow System in Informal Communications, Proc. CSCW 1990, ACM Press (1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gaver, W. The Video Window: My Life with a Ludic System, Media Space: 20+ Years of Mediated Life, Springer (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrison, S. Media Space: 20+ Years of Mediated Life, Springer (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hindus, D., Ackerman, M.S., Mainwaring, S., and Starr, B., Thunderwire: a field study of an audio-only media space, Proc. CSCW 1996, ACM Press (1996). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hindus, D, Mainwaring, S.D., Leduc, N., Hagström, A.E., and Bayley, O. Casablanca: Designing Social Communication Devices for the Home, Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 325--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hudson, S.E., and Smith, I. Techniques for Addressing Fundamental Privacy and Disruption Tradeoffs in Awareness Support Systems, Proc CSCW 96, ACM Press (1996), 248--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Rouseel, N., Eiderback, B., Lindquist, S., and Sundblad, Y. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families, Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 17--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ishii, H., Kobayashi, M., and Arita, K. Iterative Design of Seamless Collaboration Media, Communications of the ACM, 37(8), ACM Press, (1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Judge, T.K. and Neustaedter, C. Sharing Conversation and Sharing Life: Video Conferencing in the Home, Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Judge, T.K., and Neustaedter, C. The Family Window: Perceived Usage and Privacy Concerns, Technical Report TR-10-01, Dept. of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kurtz, A., Neustaedter, C., and Blose, A. Automated Videography for Residential Communications, Proc. SPIE 2010, Vol. 7527 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Lipartito, K. Picturephone and the Information Age: The Social Meaning of Failure, Technology & Culture, (2003), 50--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Lindley, S.E., Banks, R., Harper, R., Jain, A., Regan, T., Sellen, A., and Taylor, A.S. Resilience in the face of innovation: Household trials with BubbleBoard. IJHCS. 67, 2, Academic Press (2009), 154--164 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mantei, M., Baecker, R., Sellen, A., Buxton, W., Milligan, T., and Wellman, B. Experiences in the use of a media space, Proc. CHI 1991, ACM Press (1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Minneman, S., and Harrison, S. Where Were We: Making and Using Near-synchronous, Pre-narrative Video, Proc. Multimedia 1993, ACM Press (1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mynatt, E., Rowan, J., Jacobs, A., and Craighill, S. Digital Family Portraits: Supporting Peace of Mind for Extended Family Members, Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 333--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Noll, A. Anatomy of a Failure: Picturephone Revisited, Telecommunications Policy (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Neustaedter, C., and Greenberg, S. The Design of a Context-Aware Home Media Space, Proc. UbiComp 2003, Springer-Verlag (2003).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Neustaedter, C., Elliot, K., and Greenberg, S. Interpersonal Awareness in the Domestic Realm, Proc. OzCHI 2006, ACM Press (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Neustaedter, C., Greenberg, S., and Boyle, M. Blur Filtration Fails to Preserve Privacy for Home-Based Video Conferencing, ACM ToCHI, ACM Press (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Neustaedter, C., Judge, T., Kurtz, A., and Fedorovskaya, E. The Family Window: Connecting Families over Distance with a Domestic Media Space, Video Proc. CSCW 2010, ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Nunes, M., Greenberg, S., Carpendale, S., and Gutwin, C. What Did I Miss? Visualizing the Past through Video Traces, Proc. ECSCW 07, Springer (2007), 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. O'Hara, K., Black, A., and Lipson, M. Media Spaces and Mobile Video Telephony, Media Space: 20+ years of mediated life, Springer (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Romero, N., Markopoulos, P., van Baren, J., de Ruyter, B, Jsselsteijn, W., and Farshchian, B. Connecting the Family with Awareness Systems, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11, Springer-Verlag (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Roussel, N. From Analog to Digital, from the Office to the Living Room: Why I Happily Worked in a Media Space but Don't Live in One, Media Space: 20+ years of mediated life, Springer (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sellen, A., Eardley, R, Izadi, S., Harper, R., The Whereabouts Clock: Early Testing of a Situated Awareness Device, Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sellen, A., Harper, R., Eardley, R., Izadi, S., Regan, T., Taylor, A., and Wood, K., Situated Messaging in the Home, Proc. CSCW 2006, ACM Press (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Tang, J., and Minneman, S. VideoDraw: A Video Interface for Collaborative Drawing, Proc. CHI 1990, ACM Press (1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Tang, J., and Minneman, S. VideoWhiteboard: Video Shadows to Support Remote Collaboration, Proc. CHI 1991, ACM Press (1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Tee, K., Brush, A.J.B., and Inkpen, K.M. Exploring Communication and Sharing between Extended Families, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(2), (2009), 128--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Tollmar, K., and Persson, J. Understanding Remote Presence, Proc. NordiCHI 2002, ACM Press (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The family window: the design and evaluation of a domestic media space

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2010
        2690 pages
        ISBN:9781605589299
        DOI:10.1145/1753326

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader