skip to main content
10.1145/1551788.1551806acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Developing a media space for remote synchronous parent-child interaction

Published:03 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

While supporting family communication has traditionally been a domain of interest for interaction designers, few research initiatives have explicitly investigated remote synchronous communication between children and parents. We discuss the design of the ShareTable, a media space that supports synchronous interaction with children by augmenting videoconferencing with a camera-projector system to allow for shared viewing of physical artifacts. We present an exploratory evaluation of this system, highlighting how such a media space may be used by families for learning and play activities. The ShareTable was positively received by our participants and preferred over standard videoconferencing. Informed by the results of our exploratory evaluation, we discuss the next design iteration of the ShareTable and directions for future investigations in this area.

References

  1. Bly, S. A., Harrison, S. R., and Irwin, S. Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Communications of the ACM 36, 1 ACM (1993), 28--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brush, A. J., Inkpen, K. M., and Tee, K. SPARCS: exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness. Proc. of CSCW, ACM (2008), 629--638. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. U.S. Census Bureau. Children Under 18 Years Old By Presence Of Parents: 1980, 1990, 1995, 2000 And 2004 {By Race And Marital Status}. Published 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalsgaard, T., Skov, M. B., Stougaard, M., and Thomassen, B. Mediated intimacy in families: understanding the relation between children and parents. Proc. of IDC, ACM (2006), 145--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dalsgaard, T., Skov, M. B., and Thomassen, B. R. eKiss: Sharing Experiences in Families Through a Picture Blog. Proc. of British HCI, (2007), 67--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Davis, H., Skov, M. B., Stougaard, M., and Vetere, F. Virtual box: supporting mediated family intimacy through virtual and physical play. Proc. of OZCHI, ACM (2007), 151--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dourish, P. and Bellotti, V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. Proc. of CSCW, Springer (1992), 107--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Flango, C. R. Virtual Visitation --- Is This A New Option for Divorcing Parents? The National Center for State Courts, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gray, M. R. and Steinberg, L. Unpacking Authoritative Parenting: Reassessing a Multidimensional Construct. Marriage and the Family 61, 3 (1999), 574--587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofferth, S. L. and Sandberg, J. F. How American Children Spend Their Time. Marriage and Family 63, 2 (121), 295--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., et al. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. Proc. of CHI, ACM (2003), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ishii, H. TeamWorkStation: towards a seamless shared workspace. Proc. of CSCW, Springer (1990), 13--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kelly, J. B. and Lamb, M. E. Using Child Development Research to Make Appropriate Custody and Access Decisions for Young Children. Family Court Review 38, 3 (2000), 297--311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kennedy, T. L. M., Smith, A., Wells, A. T., and Wellman, B. "Networked Families." Pew Internet & American Life Project Report. Washington, D.C., 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kientz, J. A., Patel, S. N., Jones, B., Price, E., Mynatt, E. D., and Abowd, G. D. The Georgia Tech aware home. Ext. Abst. of CHI, ACM (2008), 3675--3680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lowry, R. The Fisher Exact Probability Test. In Concepts and Applications of Inferential Statistics. Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Modlitba, P. L. Globetoddler: Enhancing the experience of remote interaction for preschool children and their traveling parents. Masters Thesis. Media Laboratory. MIT. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mynatt, E., Rowan, J., Jacobs, A., and Craighill, S. Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members. Proc. of CHI, ACM (2001), 333--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nardi, B. and Harris, J. Strangers and friends: collaborative play in world of warcraft. Proc. of CSCW, Springer (2006), 149--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Plaisant, C., Clamage, A., Hutchinson, H. B., Bederson, B. B., and Druin, A. Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility. ACM Transactions on CHI 13, 3 ACM (2006), 313--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Romero, N., Markopoulos, P., van Baren, J., de Ruyter, B., IJsselsteijn, W., and Farshchian, B. Connecting the family with awareness systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 4 Springer (2007), 299--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Saslis-Lagoudakis, G., Cheverst, K., Dix, A., Fitton, D., and Rouncefield, M. Hermes@Home: supporting awareness and intimacy between distant family members. Proc. of OZCHI, ACM (2006), 23--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Siio, I., Rowan, J., and Mynatt, E. Peek-a-drawer: communication by furniture. Ext. Abst. of CHI, ACM (2002), 582--583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stafford, M. Communication Competencies and Sociocultural Priorities of Middle Childhood. In Handbook of Family Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2004, 311--332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tang, J. C. and Minneman, S. L. Videodraw: a video interface for collaborative drawing. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 9, 2 ACM (1991), 170--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Vetere, F., Davis, H., Gibbs, M., and Howard, S. The Magic Box and Collage: Responding to the challenge of distributed intergenerational play. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 2 Elsevier (2009), 165--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wilson, A. D. and Robbins, D. C. PlayTogether: Playing Games across Multiple Interactive Tabletops. (2007), 53--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Yarosh, S., Chew, Y. C., and Abowd, G. D. Supporting Parent-Child Communication in Divorced Families. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 67, 2 Elsevier (2009), 192--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Zuckerman, O. and Maes, P. Awareness system for children in distributed families. Ext. Abst. of IDC, ACM Press (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Developing a media space for remote synchronous parent-child interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IDC '09: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
      June 2009
      347 pages
      ISBN:9781605583952
      DOI:10.1145/1551788

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 June 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader