skip to main content
article
Free Access

Videodraw: a video interface for collaborative drawing

Published:01 April 1991Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1 BL~, S.A. A use of drawing surfaces in different collaborative settings. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Portland, Ore., Sept. 1988), pp. 250-256. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 Ecmo, C. Videoconferencing as a technology to aupport group work: A review of its failure. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Portland, Ore., Sept. 1988), pp. 13-24. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 FOLEY, J. D Interfaces for Advanced Computing Sci. Am. 257, 4 (Oct. 1987), 126-135. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 GERmSSEN, J. F., AND DAAMEN, J. Inclumon of "sharing" feature in telecommunicatmn services. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications, (Torino, Italy, Sept. 1990), pp 601-608.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 GOOPWIN, C. AND GOODWIN, M.H. Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics. 1, I (July 1987), 1-54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 GRmF, I., (ED). Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, Calif., 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 ISHU, H. Team WorkStation: Towards a seamless shared workspace. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperatwe Work (Los Angeles, Sept 1990), pp. 13-26. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 KENYON, A. Current Issues in the Study of Gesture. In The biological foundatwns of gestures: Motor and semiotic aspects, J-L. Nespoulous, P. Perron, and A. R. Lecours Eds , Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J. 1986, pp. 23-47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 KRUEGER, M.W. Artificial Reahty. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 LAUWERS, J. C, AND LANTZ, K. A. Collaboration awareness in support of collaboration transparency: Requirements for the next generation of shared window systems, In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Human Interaction CHI '90 (Seattle, Wash., Apr 1990), pp. 303-311. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 MANTEl, M. Capturing the capture lab concepts: A case study in the design of computer supported meeting environments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperatwe Work (Portland, Ore., Sept. 1988), pp. 257-270. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 MINNEM^N. S L., AND BLY, S.A. Managing ~ trois: A study of a multi-user drawing tool m distributed design work In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Human Interaction CHI '91 (New Orleans, La., Apr./May 1991), pp. 217-224. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 NmLSE~, J. CHI '89 Trip Report. SIGCHI Bull. 21, 2 (Oct. 1989), pp. 28-40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 SMITH, R. B., O'SHEA, T., O'MALLEY, C , SCANLON, E., AND TAYLOR, J. Preliminary experiments with a distributed multi-media, problem solwng environment. In Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperatwe Work (London, Sept. 1989), pp. 19-34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 STEFIK, M. FOSTER, G., BOBROW, D. G., KAttN, K., LANNING, S., AND SUCHMAN, L. Beyond the chalkboard: Computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings Commun. ACM. 30, 1 (Jan. 1987), 32-47. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 STULTS, e. Experimental Uses of Video to Support Design Act~v~tzes. Xerox PARC Tech. Rep. SSL-89-19, Dec. 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 SUCHMAN, L.A. Representing Practice in Cognitive Science. In Representation and Scientific Practice, M. Lynch and S. Woolgar Eds. MIT Press. Cambridge, Mass. 1990, pp. 301-322.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 TAN6, J. C. Ltstzng, Drawing, and Gesturing zn Design: A Study of the Use of Shared Workspaces by Design Teams. Xerox PARC Tech. Rep SSL-89-3. Ph.D Dissertatmn, Stanford Umv., Apr. 1989Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 TANC, J. C., AND MI~NEMAN, S. L. VideoWhiteboard: Video Shadows to Support Remote Collaboration. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Human Interactwn CHI '91 (New Orleans, La., April/May 1991), pp. 315-322. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 TATAR, D. Using video-based observation to shape the design of a new technology. SIGCHI Bull. 21, 2 (Oct. 1989), 108-111. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 TATAR, D. G., FOSTER, G. S., AND BOBROW, D. G Design for conversation: Lessons from Cognoter. Int. J. Man-Mech. Stud. 34, 2 (Feb. 1991), lg5 209 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 WEBER, K., AND MINNEMAN, S. L. The office design project. Videotape, Pale Alto, Calif., Xerox PARC, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Videodraw: a video interface for collaborative drawing

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader