A New EHR Training Curriculum and Assessment for Pediatric Residents

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Conventional classroom Electronic Health Record (EHR) training is often insufficient for new EHR users. Studies suggest that enhanced training with a hands-on approach and closely supported clinical use is beneficial.

Objectives Our goals were to develop an enhanced EHR learning curriculum for Post Graduate Year 1 (PGY1) residents and measure changes in EHR skill proficiency, efficiency, and self-efficacy.

Methods A novel three-phase, multimodal enhanced EHR curriculum was designed for a cohort of PGY1 residents. After basic training, residents began phase 1 of enhanced training, including demonstrations, live practice, and order set review. Phase 2 involved skills-oriented assignments, role playing, and medication entry. Phase 3 included shadowing, scribing histories, and supervised order entry. Residents' EHR skills and attitudes were measured and compared before and after the enhanced curriculum via proficiency test and a survey of efficiency and self-efficacy.

Results Nineteen of 26 PGY1 residents participated in the study (73%). There was significant improvement in mean proficiency scores and two of the five individual proficiency scores. There were significant improvements in most efficiency survey responses from pre- to postintervention. For the self-efficacy presurvey, many PGY1s reported to be “very” or “somewhat confident” performing each of the five tasks, and perceptions did not improve or worsened on most postsurvey responses. The greatest resource was the time required to design and deliver the enhanced training.

Conclusion An enhanced training curriculum along with a proficiency assessment was developed and described here. An enhanced training curriculum significantly improved PGY1 EHR efficiency and some measures of proficiency but not self-efficacy. This intervention may support improved EHR-related clinic workflows, which ultimately could enable residents and preceptors to prioritize patient care and time for clinical education.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Drexel University College of Medicine and was in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on ethical principles regarding medical research involving human subjects.

• References

• 1 Tierney MJ, Pageler NM, Kahana M, Pantaleoni JL, Longhurst CA. Medical education in the electronic medical record (EMR) era: benefits, challenges, and future directions. Acad Med 2013; 88 (06) 748-752
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Keenan CR, Nguyen HH, Srinivasan M. Electronic medical records and their impact on resident and medical student education. Acad Psychiatry 2006; 30 (06) 522-527
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Atwater AR, Rudd M, Brown A. , et al. Developing teaching strategies in the EHR era: a survey of GME experts. J Grad Med Educ 2016; 8 (04) 581-586
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Nuovo J, Hutchinson D, Balsbaugh T, Keenan C. Establishing electronic health record competency testing for first-year residents. J Grad Med Educ 2013; 5 (04) 658-661
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Dastagir MT, Chin HL, McNamara M, Poteraj K, Battaglini S, Alstot L. Advanced proficiency EHR training: effect on physicians' EHR efficiency, EHR satisfaction and job satisfaction. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2012; 2012: 136-143
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Jalota L, Aryal MR, Mahmood M, Wasser T, Donato A. Interventions to increase physician efficiency and comfort with an electronic health record system. Methods Inf Med 2015; 54 (01) 103-109
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Benson B. Competency 7. Use information technology to optimize learning and care delivery. Within: the pediatrics milestones: pursuit of a national system of workplace-based assessment through key stakeholder collaboration. Acad Pediatr 2014; 14: S48-S50
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 McAlearney AS, Robbins J, Kowalczyk N, Chisolm DJ, Song PH. The role of cognitive and learning theories in supporting successful EHR system implementation training: a qualitative study. Med Care Res Rev 2012; 69 (03) 294-315
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Reed S, Shell R, Kassis K. , et al. Applying adult learning practices in medical education. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2014; 44 (06) 170-181
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Vuk J, Anders ME, Mercado CC, Kennedy RL, Casella J, Steelman SC. Impact of simulation training on self-efficacy of outpatient health care providers to use electronic health records. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84 (06) 423-429
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Milano CE, Hardman JA, Plesiu A, Rdesinski RE, Biagioli FE. Simulated electronic health record (Sim-EHR) curriculum: teaching EHR skills and use of the EHR for disease management and prevention. Acad Med 2014; 89 (03) 399-403
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Reis S, Sagi D, Eisenberg O. , et al. The impact of residents' training in Electronic Medical Record (EMR) use on their competence: report of a pragmatic trial. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 93 (03) 515-521
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Wald HS, George P, Reis SP, Taylor JS. Electronic health record training in undergraduate medical education: bridging theory to practice with curricula for empowering patient- and relationship-centered care in the computerized setting. Acad Med 2014; 89 (03) 380-386
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Biagioli FE, Elliot DL, Palmer RT. , et al. The electronic health record objective structured clinical examination: assessing student competency in patient interactions while using the electronic health record. Acad Med 2017; 92 (01) 87-91
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Pantaleoni JL, Stevens LA, Mailes ES, Goad BA, Longhurst CA. Successful physician training program for large scale EMR implementation. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6 (01) 80-95
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Nicklaus J, Kusser J, Zessin J, Amaya M. Transforming education for electronic health record implementation. J Contin Educ Nurs 2015; 46 (08) 359-363
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Downing SM. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 2003; 37 (09) 830-837
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar