Impact of different malocclusion types on the vertical mandibular asymmetry in young adult sample

 

 Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the vertical mandibular asymmetry in a group of adult patients with different types of malocclusions, based on Angle's dental classification. Materials and Methods: A sample of 102 patients (age range 19–28) who went for routine orthodontic treatment in the institution were divided into four groups: Class I, 26 patients; Class II/1, 30 patients; Class III, 23 patients; and control group (CG) with normal occlusion, 23 patients. Condylar asymmetry index (CAI), ramal asymmetry index (RAI), condylar-plus-ramal asymmetry index values were measured for all patients on panoramic radiographs. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-test at the 95% confidence level (P < 0.05). Results: The results of the analysis showed that different occlusal types significantly affected the vertical symmetry of the mandible at the condylar level. Class I and Class II/1 malocclusion groups showed a significant difference in CAI values relative to the CG (P < 0.05, P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the CG and Class III malocclusion group (P > 0.05). Comparisons between Class II/1 and Class I malocclusions revealed a significant difference in CAI values (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Both Class II/1 and Class I malocclusions patients had significantly higher CAI values compared to CG and Class III group. CAI value was significantly higher in Class II/1 malocclusion compared to Class I malocclusion. Both these malocclusions could act as a predisposing factor for having asymmetric condyles if left untreated.

• REFERENCES

• 1 Stedman G. Stedman's Medical Dictionary. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Company; 1966
  Google Scholar
• 2 You KH, Lee KJ, Lee SH, Baik HS. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 540.e1-8
  Google Scholar
• 3 Ferro F, Spinella P, Lama N. Transverse maxillary arch form and mandibular asymmetry in patients with posterior unilateral crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 828-38
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Habets LL, Bezuur JN, Naeiji M, Hansson TL. The Orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. II. The vertical symmetry. J Oral Rehabil 1988; 15: 465-71
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Miller VJ. Variation of condylar asymmetry with age in edentulous patients with a craniomandibular disorder of myogenous origin. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 384-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Miller VJ, Bodner L. Condylar asymmetry measurements in patients with an Angle's Class III malocclusion. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 247-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Miller VJ, Smidt A. Condylar asymmetry and age in patients with an Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23: 712-5
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Saglam AM. The condylar asymmetry measurements in different skeletal patterns. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 738-42
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Sezgin OS, Celenk P, Arici S. Mandibular asymmetry in different occlusion patterns. Angle Orthod 2007; 77: 803-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Kasimoglu Y, Tuna EB, Rahimi B, Marsan G, Gencay K. Condylar asymmetry in different occlusion types. Cranio 2015; 33: 10-4
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Rose JM, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA, Moles R. Mandibular skeletal and dental asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 105: 489-95
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Kambylafkas P, Kyrkanides S, Tallents RH. Mandibular asymmetry in adult patients with unilateral degenerative joint disease. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 305-10
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Vitral RW, Telles CdeS. Computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint alterations in class II Division 1 subdivision patients: Condylar symmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 369-75
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Kiki A, Kiliç N, Oktay H. Condylar asymmetry in bilateral posterior crossbite patients. Angle Orthod 2007; 77: 77-81
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Halicioglu K, Celikoglu M, Buyuk SK, Sekerci AE, Candirli C. Effects of early unilateral mandibular first molar extraction on condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 178-83
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Sievers MM, Larson BE, Gaillard PR, Wey A. Asymmetry assessment using cone beam CT. A Class I and Class II patient comparison. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 410-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar