CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2015; 09(03): 394-399
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.163232
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Establishment of a new relationship between posed smile width and lower facial height: A cross-sectional study

Aby Abraham
1   Department of Orthodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India
,
Jinu George
1   Department of Orthodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India
,
Elbe Peter
1   Department of Orthodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India
,
Koshi Philip
1   Department of Orthodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India
,
Rajesh Chankramath
2   Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India
,
Dexton Antony Johns
3   Department of Endodontics, KMCT Dental College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
,
Anitha Bhaskar
4   Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objective: The present study is intended to add a new parameter that would be useful in orthodontic clinical evaluation, treatment planning, and determination of vertical dimension (at occlusion). Materials and Methods: Standardized videographic recording of 79 subjects during posed smile was captured. Each video was then cut into 30 photos using the free studio software. The widest commissure-to-commissure posed smile frame (posed smile width [SW]) was selected as one of 10 or more frames showing an identical smile. Lower third of the face is measured from subnasale to soft tissue menton using a digital vernier caliper. Two values were then compared. Ratio between lower facial height and posed SW was calculated. Results: The co-relation between smiling width and lower facial height was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.01). The ratio of lower facial height and smiling width was calculated as 1.0016 with a standard deviation (SD) = 0.04 in males and 1.0301 with an SD = 0.07 in females. The difference between the mean lower facial height in males and females was statistically significant with a t = 10.231 and P = 0.000. The difference between the mean smiling width in males and females was also statistically significant with a t = 5.653 and P = 0.000. Conclusion: In class I subjects with pleasing appearance, normal facial proportions, normal overjet and overbite, and average Frankfort mandibular angle, the lower facial height (subnasale to soft tissue menton) is equal to posed SW.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Walder JF, Freeman K, Lipp MJ, Nicolay OF, Cisneros GJ. Photographic and videographic assessment of the smile: Objective and subjective evaluations of posed and spontaneous smiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 793-801
  • 2 Profitt W. Contemporary Orthodontics. 2nd ed.. Mosby; St Louis: 1997: p. 110
  • 3 Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The gingival smile line. Angle Orthod 1992; 62: 91-100
  • 4 Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: Revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 75: 328-38
  • 5 Rigsbee 3rd OH, Sperry TP, BeGole EA. The influence of facial animation on smile characteristics. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1988; 3: 233-9
  • 6 Mackley RJ. An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1993; 63: 183-9
  • 7 Formby WA, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Longitudinal changes in the adult facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 105: 464-76
  • 8 Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 24-8
  • 9 Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36: 221-36
  • 10 Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 4-12
  • 11 Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 116-27
  • 12 Desai S, Upadhyay M, Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis: Changes with age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 310.e1-10
  • 13 van der Geld PA, Oosterveld P, van Waas MA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Digital videographic measurement of tooth display and lip position in smiling and speech: Reliability and clinical application. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 301.e1-8
  • 14 Sim RS, Smith JD, Chan AS. Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of southern Chinese and white women. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000; 2: 113-20
  • 15 Wang D, Qian G, Zhang M, Farkas LG. Differences in horizontal, neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1997; 21: 265-9
  • 16 Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York: Thieme-Stratton; 1984
  • 17 Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, Cummings DR, Beress A, Worley Jr CM. et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: Diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 239-53
  • 18 Kadhom ZM, Al-Janabi MF. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for a sample of Iraqi adults with class I normal occlusion in natural head position. J Bagh Coll Dent 2011; 23: 160-6
  • 19 Uysal T, Yagci A, Basciftci FA, Sisman Y. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31: 449-56
  • 20 Chhajed S, Kodumuru S, Singh G, Arun AV, Cholleti SK, Kothari S. Facial Soft Tissue Cephalometric Norms in a Central Indian Ethnic Population (Madhya Pradesh). J Indian Ortod Soc 2014; 48: 7-13
  • 21 Sinojiya J, Aileni KR, Rachala MR, Pyata JR, Mallikarjun V, Reddy CM. Soft tissue esthetic norms for mahabubnagar population of southern India. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: 255-9
  • 22 Upadhyay JS, Maheshwari S, Verma SK, Zahid SN. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis applied to regional Indian population. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2013; 4: 159-66
  • 23 Kalha AS, Latif A, Govardhan SN. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a South Indian ethnic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 876-81
  • 24 Chou JC, Thompson GA, Aggarval HA, Bosio JA, Irelan JP. Effect of occlusal vertical dimension on lip position at smile. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 533-9