Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2006; 23(7): 403-411
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-951289
Copyright © 2006 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Term and Near-Term Infants with Acute Respiratory Failure: Early Rescue Use

Nejla Ben Jaballah1 , Khaled Mnif1 , Ammar Khaldi1 , Asma Bouziri1 , Sarra Belhadj1 , Asma Hamdi1
  • 1Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2006 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

This study describes a high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) protocol for term and near-term infants with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and reports results of its prospective application. Neonates, with gestational age ≥ 34 weeks, were managed with HFOV, if required, on conventional ventilation (CV), a fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio 2) 0.5, and a mean airway pressure > 10 cm H2O to maintain adequate oxygenation or a peak inspiratory pressure > 24 cm H2O to maintain tidal volume between 5 and 7 mL/kg of body weight. Seventy-seven infants (gestational age, 37 ± 2,3 weeks), received HFOV after a mean duration of CV of 7.5 ± 9.7 hours. Arterial blood gases, oxygenation index (OI), and alveolar-arterial difference in partial pressure of oxygen (Pao 2 - Pao 2) were recorded prospectively before and during HFOV. There were a rapid and sustained decreases in mean airway pressure (MAP), Fio 2, OI, and Pao 2 - Pao 2 during HFOV (p ≤ 0.01). Seventy infants (91%) were weaned successfully from HFOV. Seven infants (Pao 2 - Pao 2 prior to HFOV, 601 ± 89 mm Hg) were classified as having experienced treatment failure and died from their underlying disease. Treatment failure was associated with lack of improvement in Pao 2 - Pao 2 at 1 hour of HFOV (p < 0.01). Early rescue intervention with HFOV is an effective protocol for term and near-term infants with ARF. Failure to improve Pao 2 - Pao 2 rapidly on HFOV is associated with HFOV failure. Randomized controlled trials are needed to identify benefits of HFOV versus conventional modes of mechanical ventilation.

KEYWORDS

Mechanical ventilation - high-frequency ventilation - newborn - respiratory insufficiency

REFERENCES

  • 1 Roy B J, Rycus P, Conrad S A, Clark R H. The changing demographics of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry.  Pediatrics. 2000;  106 1334-1338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Somme S, Liu D C. News trends in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in newborn pulmonary diseases.  Artif Organs. 2001;  25 633-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Carter J M, Gerstmann D R, Clark R H. High frequency oscillation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the treatment of acute neonatal respiratory failure.  Pediatrics. 1990;  85 159-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Clark R H, Yoder B A, Sell M S. Prospective, randomized comparison of high-frequency oscillation and conventional ventilation in candidates for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.  J Pediatr. 1994;  124 447-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kohlet D, Perlman M, Kirpalani H. High frequency oscillation in the rescue of infants with persistent pulmonary hypertension.  Crit Care Med. 1988;  16 510-516
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Varnholt V, Lasch P, Suske G, Kachel W, Brands W. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn.  Eur J Pediatr. 1992;  151 769-774
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rojas M A, Lozano J M, Rojas M X et al.. Randomized, multicenter trial of conventional ventilation versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the early management of respiratory failure in term or near-term infants in Colombia.  J Perinatol. 2005;  25 720-724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mc Callion N, Davis P G, Morley C J. Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in the neonate.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;  3 , CD003666
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jobe A H. Pulmonary surfactant therapy.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  328 861-868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Auten R L, Notter R H, Kendig J W et al.. Surfactant treatment of full-term newborns with respiratory failure.  Pediatrics. 1991;  87 101-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Soll R F, Dargaville P. Surfactant for meconium aspiration syndrome in full term infants.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;  2 , CD002054
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 De Lemos R A, Coalson J J, Gertsmann D R et al.. Ventilatory management of infant baboons with hyaline membrane disease: the use of high frequency ventilation.  Pediatr Res. 1987;  21 594-602
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hamilton P P, Onayemi A, Smyth J A et al.. Comparison of conventional and high frequency ventilation: oxygenation and lung pathology.  J Appl Physiol. 1983;  55 131-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 De Lemos R A, Coalson J J, De Lemos J A, King R J, Clark R H, Gertsmann D R. Rescue ventilation with high frequency oscillation in premature baboons with hyaline membrane disease.  Pediatr Pulmonol. 1992;  12 29-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Imai Y, Kawano T, Miyasaka K, Takata M, Imai T, Okuyama K. Inflammatory chemical mediators during conventional ventilation.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;  150 1550-1554
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hachey W E, Eyal F G, Curtet- Eyal N L, Kellum F E. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation in a piglet model of early meconium aspiration.  Crit Care Med. 1998;  26 556-561
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 McCulloch P R, Forkert P G, Froese A B. Lung volume maintenance prevents lung injury during high frequency oscillatory ventilation in surfactant-deficient rabbits.  Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;  137 1185-1192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Meredith K S, De Lemos R A, Coalson J J et al.. Role of lung injury in the pathogenesis of hyaline membrane disease.  J Appl Physiol. 1989;  66 2150-2158
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Wiswell T E, Foster N H, Slayter M V, Hachey W E. Management of a piglet model of the meconium aspiration syndrome with high-frequency or conventional ventilation.  Am J Dis Child. 1992;  146 1287-1293
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bhuta T, Clark R H, Henderson-Smart D J. Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation vs conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;  1 , CD002974
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 DeLemos R A, Coalson J J, Meredith K S, Gerstmann D R, Null Jr D M. A comparison of ventilation strategies fot the use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the treatment of hyaline membrane disease.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1989;  90(suppl) 102-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Jackson C J, Truog W E, Standaert T A et al.. Reduction in lung injury after combined surfactant and high-frequency ventilation.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;  150 534-539
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cole C H, Jillson E, Kessler D. ECMO: regional evaluation of need and applicability of selection criteria.  Am J Dis Child. 1988;  142 1320-1324
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Schwendeman C A, Clark R H, Yoder B A, Null Jr D M, Gerstmann D R, Delemos R A. Frequency of chronic lung disease in infants with severe respiratory failure treated with high-frequency ventilation and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.  Crit Care Med. 1992;  20 372-377
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Paranka M S, Clark R H, Yoder B A, Null Jr D M. Predictors of failure of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in term infants with severe respiratory failure.  Pediatrics. 1995;  95 400-404
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

 Professor
Nejla Ben Jaballah

Service de Réanimation Pédiatrique Polyvalente, Hôpital d'Enfants de Tunis, Place Bab Saadoun

1007, Tunis, Tunisie

      >