Connectionist Approaches to Understanding Aphasic Perseveration

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Aphasic patients make a variety of speech errors, including perseverations, in tasks that involve a linguistic component. What do perseverative and other errors imply about the nature of the neurologically damaged and intact language systems? Here we discuss the insights into the mechanisms of aphasic perseveration afforded by connectionist models. As a base for discussion, we review the Plaut and Shallice model of optic aphasic errors in object naming, which relies primarily on short-term learning mechanisms to produce perseverations. We then point out limitations of the model in addressing more recent data collected on aphasic perseveration and explain how incorporating information about the interaction of neuromodulatory systems and learning in the brain may help to overcome these limitations.

REFERENCES

• 1 Hudson A J. Perseveration.  Brain. 1968;  91 571-582
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Sandson J, Albert M L. Varieties of perseveration.  Neuropsychologia. 1984;  22 715-732
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Albert M L, Sandson J. Perseveration in aphasia.  Cortex. 1986;  22 103-115
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Cohen L, Dehaene S. Competition between past and present: assessment and interpretation of verbal perseverations.  Brain. 1998;  121 1641-1659
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Gotts S J, Incisa della Rocchetta A, Cipolotti L. Mechanisms underlying perseveration in aphasia: evidence from a single case study.  Neuropsychologia. 2002;  40 1930-1947
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Buckingham H W, Whitaker H, Whitaker H A. On linguistic perseveration. In: Whitaker HA, Whitaker H Studies of Neurolinguistics, Vol. 4. New York; Academic Press 1979: 329-352
  Google Scholar
• 7 Halpern H. Effect of stimulus variables on verbal perseveration of aphasic subjects.  Percept Mot Skills. 1965;  20 421-429
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Santo Pietro M J, Rigrodsky S. The effects of temporal and semantic conditions on the occurrence of the error response of perseveration in adult aphasics.  J Speech Hear Res. 1982;  25 184-192
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Lhermitte F, Beauvois M F. A visual-speech disconnexion syndrome: report of a case with optic aphasia, agnosic alexia and colour agnosia.  Brain. 1973;  96 695-714
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Martin N, Roach A, Brecher A, Lowery J. Lexical retrieval mechanisms underlying whole-word perseveration errors in anomic aphasia.  Aphasiology. 1998;  12 319-333
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Papagno C, Basso A. Perseveration in two aphasic patients.  Cortex. 1996;  32 67-82
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Basso A. Perseveration or the Tower of Babel.  Semin Speech Lang. 2004;  25 375-390
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Behrmann M, Zemel R S, Mozer M C. Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model.  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998;  24 1011-1036
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Vecera S P, O'Reilly R C. Figure-ground organization and object recognition processes: an interactive account.  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998;  24 441-462
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Plaut D C, McClelland J L, Seidenberg M S, Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains.  Psychol Rev. 1996;  103 56-115
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Rohde D LT, Plaut D C. Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: how important is starting small?.  Cognition. 1999;  72 67-109
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Dell G S, Schwartz M F, Martin N, Saffran E M, Gagnon D A. Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.  Psychol Rev. 1997;  104 801-838
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Farah M J, McClelland J L. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality-specificity and emergent category-specificity.  J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991;  120 339-357
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 McClelland J L, Rogers T T. The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition.  Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;  4 310-322
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 McRae K, de Sa V R, Seidenberg M S. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.  J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997;  126 99-130
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Plaut D C. Graded modality-specific specialization in semantics: a computational account of optic aphasia.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002;  19 603-639
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 McClelland J L, McNaughton B L, O’Reilly R C. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory.  Psychol Rev. 1995;  102 419-457
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Norman K A, O’Reilly R C. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary learning systems approach.  Psychol Rev. 2003;  110 611-646
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Stark C EL, McClelland J L. Repetition priming of words, pseudowords, and nonwords.  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000;  26 945-972
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Cohen J D, Dunbar K, McClelland J L. On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.  Psychol Rev. 1990;  97 332-361
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 O'Reilly R C, Noelle D C, Braver T S, Cohen J D. Prefrontal cortex and dynamic categorization tasks: representational organization and neuromodulatory control.  Cereb Cortex. 2002;  12 246-257
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Botvinik M, Plaut D C. Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action.  Psychol Rev. 2004;  111 395-429
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Cohen J D, Servan-Schreiber D. Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia.  Psychol Rev. 1992;  99 45-77
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Hinton G E, Shallice T. Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia.  Psychol Rev. 1991;  98 74-95
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Munakata Y, McClelland J L, Johnson M H, Siegler R S. Rethinking infant knowledge: toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks.  Psychol Rev. 1997;  104 686-713
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Plaut D C, Shallice T. Deep dyslexia: a case study of connectionist neuropsychology.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1993;  10 377-500
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Rogers T T, Lambon Ralph M A, Garrard P et al.. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.  Psychol Rev. 2004;  111 205-235
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Rogers T T, McClelland J L. A parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition: applications to conceptual development. In: Gershkoff-Stowe L, Rakison D Building Object Categories in Developmental Time Hillsdale, NJ; Erlbaum 2005 (in press)
  Google Scholar
• 34 Plaut D C, Shallice T. Perseverative and semantic influences on visual object naming errors in optic aphasia: a connectionist account.  J Cogn Neurosci. 1993;  5 89-117
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Hirsh K W. Perseveration and activation in aphasic speech production.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998;  15 377-388
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Gil R, Pluchon C, Toullat G et al.. Visuoverbal disconnection (optical aphasia) for objects, pictures, coloors and faces with abstractive alexia [in French].  Neuropsychologia. 1985;  23 333-349
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Shallice T. The language-to-object perception interface: evidence from Neuropsychology. In: Bloom P, Peterson MA, Nadel L, Garrett MF Language and Space Cambridge, MA; The MIT Press 1995: 531-552
  Google Scholar
• 38 Hillis A E, Caramazza A. Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying visual and semantic processing: Implications from “optic aphasia.”  J Cogn Neurosci. 1995;  7 457-478
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Riddoch M J, Humphreys G W. Visual object processing in optic aphasia: a case of semantic access agnosia.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1987;  4 131-185
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Iorio L, Falanga A, Fragassi N A, Grossi D. Visual associative agnosia and optic aphasia: a single case study and review of the syndromes.  Cortex. 1992;  28 23-37
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Marr D, Nishihara H K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes.  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978;  200 269-294
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Palmer S E. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation.  Cognit Psychol. 1977;  9 441-474
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Rumelhart D E, Hinton G E, Williams R J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors.  Nature. 1986;  323 533-536
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Williams R J, Peng J. An efficient gradient-based algorithm for on-line training of recurrent network trajectories.  Neural Comput. 1990;  2 490-501
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Bayles K A, Tomoeda K, McKnight P, Helm-Estabrooks N, Hawley J. Verbal perseveration in individuals with Alzheimer's disease. Semin Speech Lang 2004 25: 335-348
  Google Scholar
• 46 Rumelhart D E, McClelland J L. PDP Research Group .Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press 1986
  Google Scholar
• 47 Kohn S E, Goodglass H. Picture naming in aphasia.  Brain Lang. 1985;  24 266-283
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 McNamara P, Albert M L. Neuropharmacology of verbal perseveration.  Semin Speech Lang. 2004;  25 309-322
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Fuld P A, Katzman R, Davies P, Terry R D. Intrusions as a sign of Alzheimer's dementia: chemical and pathological verification.  Ann Neurol. 1982;  11 155-159
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Sandson J, Albert M L. Perseveration in behavioral neurology.  Neurology. 1987;  37 1736-1741
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Hasselmo M E. Neuromodulation and cortical function: modeling the physiological basis of behavior.  Behav Brain Res. 1995;  67 1-27
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Selden N R, Gitelman D R, Salamon-Murayama N, Parrish T B, Mesulam M M. Trajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain.  Brain. 1998;  121 2249-2257
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Shelton J R, Martin R C. How semantic is automatic semantic priming?.  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992;  18 1191-1210
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Neely J H. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: a selective review of current findings and theories. In: Besner D, Humphreys GW Basic Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1991: 264-336
  Google Scholar
• 55 Gotts S J, Plaut D C. The impact of synaptic depression following brain damage: a connectionist account of “access” and “degraded-store” semantic impairments.  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2002;  2 187-213
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Nelson S B, Sjostrom P J, Turrigiano G G. Rate and timing in cortical synaptic plasticity.  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002;  357 1851-1857
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

Stephen J GottsPh.D. 

Laboratory of Neuropsychology

NIMH/NIH, Bldg. 49, Suite 1B-80

Bethesda, MD 20892

Email: gotts@nih.gov