Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779476
Utilizing a Second Flap to Address the Effect of Postradiotherapy Soft Tissue Fibrosis in Head and Neck Malignancy
Abstract
Background Late effects of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) on soft tissues can lead to hair loss, pigmentary changes, loss of tissue volume, and fibrosis, which appear months to years after the treatment. These changes are often progressive and are because of tissue hypoxia due to radiation-induced capillary endothelial damage. Tissue hypoxia may be compounded by subclinical infection following minor trauma, exposed hardware, or associated osteoradionecrosis. The combined effect of these factors causes significant deformities in soft tissue, affecting both function and appearance. Such changes are also seen in primarily transferred flaps, which have been radiated, resulting in severe, progressive soft tissue fibrosis, compromising function and aesthetics. In selected cases, a second flap may be needed to restore function and volume.
Methods Data of patients who underwent secondary soft tissue transfers for postradiotherapy-related soft tissue changes were collected from the hospital electronic medical records, from January 2019 to 2023. Details regarding the primary surgery, dose, duration of adjuvant RT, time interval between adjuvant RT and secondary soft tissue transfer, indications, and the choice of the second flap were analyzed.
Results Twenty-one patients had undergone secondary soft tissue transfer for extensive soft tissue fibrosis. In addition, associated compounding features like exposed implant and volume loss were observed. Two patients with osteoradionecrosis also had associated extensive soft tissue fibrosis necessitating replacement. Out of these 21 patients, 13 had undergone free tissue transfers, while 7 locoregional tissue transfers.
Conclusion Late sequelae of adjuvant RT changes usually present from 6 months onwards. The radiated hypoxic tissue, due to capillary damage, leads to a chronic progressive fibrotic stage, causing loss of soft tissue volume and fibrosis. Replacing this tissue with a vascularized flap helps to restore volume and correct these secondary changes, improving overall quality of life.
Publication History
Article published online:
02 February 2024
© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Stone HB, Coleman CN, Anscher MS, McBride WH. Effects of radiation on normal tissue: consequences and mechanisms. Lancet Oncol 2003; 4 (09) 529-536
- 2 Buboltz JB, Hendriksen S, Cooper JS. Hyperbaric Soft Tissue Radionecrosis. [Updated 2023 Jul 24]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023
- 3 Vissink A, Jansma J, Spijkervet FK, Burlage FR, Coppes RP. Oral sequelae of head and neck radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003; 14 (03) 199-212
- 4 Stubblefield MD. Clinical evaluation and management of radiation fibrosis syndrome. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2017; 28 (01) 89-100
- 5 Cooper JS, Fu K, Marks J, Silverman S. Late effects of radiation therapy in the head and neck region. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31 (05) 1141-1164
- 6 Burnet NG, Johansen J, Turesson I, Nyman J, Peacock JH. Describing patients' normal tissue reactions: concerning the possibility of individualising radiotherapy dose prescriptions based on potential predictive assays of normal tissue radiosensitivity. Steering Committee of the BioMed2 European Union Concerted Action Programme on the Development of Predictive Tests of Normal Tissue Response to Radiation Therapy. Int J Cancer 1998; 79 (06) 606-613
- 7 Bentzen SM, Overgaard J. Patient-to-patient variability in the expression of radiation-induced normal tissue injury. Semin Radiat Oncol 1994; 4 (02) 68-80
- 8 Strojan P, Hutcheson KA, Eisbruch A. et al. Treatment of late sequelae after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2017; 59: 79-92
- 9 Bentzen SM. Preventing or reducing late side effects of radiation therapy: radiobiology meets molecular pathology. Nat Rev Cancer 2006; 6 (09) 702-713
- 10 Masuda Y, Kamiya K. Molecular nature of radiation injury and DNA repair disorders associated with radiosensitivity. Int J Hematol 2012; 95 (03) 239-245
- 11 Straub JM, New J, Hamilton CD, Lominska C, Shnayder Y, Thomas SM. Radiation-induced fibrosis: mechanisms and implications for therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2015; 141 (11) 1985-1994
- 12 Merlotti A, Alterio D, Vigna-Taglianti R. et al; Italian Association of Radiation Oncology. Technical guidelines for head and neck cancer IMRT on behalf of the Italian association of radiation oncology - head and neck working group. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9: 264
- 13 Borrelli MR, Patel RA, Sokol J. et al. Fat chance: the rejuvenation of irradiated skin. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (02) e2092
- 14 Luan A, Duscher D, Whittam AJ. et al. Cell-assisted lipotransfer improves volume retention in irradiated recipient sites and rescues radiation-induced skin changes. Stem Cells 2016; 34 (03) 668-673
- 15 Wei FC, Demirkan F, Chen HC, Chen IH, Liao CT, Hau SP. Management of secondary soft-tissue deficits following microsurgical head and neck reconstruction by means of another free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (04) 1158-1166
- 16 Ross G, Yla-Kotola TM, Goldstein D. et al. Second free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (09) 1165-1168