Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2024; 40(03): 323-330
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778072
Original Article

Computational Fluid Dynamics and Its Potential Applications for the ENT Clinician

Zachary T. Root    *
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
,
Aspen R. Schneller   *
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
,
Thomas J. Lepley   *
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
,
Zhenxing Wu
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
,
Kai Zhao
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
› Author Affiliations Funding K.Z. was funded by NIH NIDCD R01DC020302. The funder has no role in designing and conducting of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This article is an examination of computational fluid dynamics in the field of otolaryngology, specifically rhinology. The historical development and subsequent application of computational fluid dynamics continues to enhance our understanding of various sinonasal conditions and surgical planning in the field today. This article aims to provide a description of computational fluid dynamics, the methods for its application, and the clinical relevance of its results. Consideration of recent research and data in computational fluid dynamics demonstrates its use in nonhistological disease pathology exploration, accompanied by a large potential for surgical guidance applications. Additionally, this article defines in lay terms the variables analyzed in the computational fluid dynamic process, including velocity, wall shear stress, area, resistance, and heat flux.

Keywords

computational fluid dynamics - rhinology - septoplasty - inferior turbinate reduction

* These authors contributed equally to the article.




Publication History

Article published online:
15 January 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Girardin M, Bilgen E, Arbour P. Experimental study of velocity fields in a human nasal fossa by laser anemometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92 (3, Pt 1): 231-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hornung DE, Leopold DA, Youngentob SL. et al. Airflow patterns in a human nasal model. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 113 (02) 169-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hahn I, Scherer PW, Mozell MM. Velocity profiles measured for airflow through a large-scale model of the human nasal cavity. J Appl Physiol 1993; 75 (05) 2273-2287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Keyhani K, Scherer PW, Mozell MM. Numerical simulation of airflow in the human nasal cavity. J Biomech Eng 1995; 117 (04) 429-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zhao K, Scherer PW, Hajiloo SA, Dalton P. Effect of anatomy on human nasal air flow and odorant transport patterns: implications for olfaction. Chem Senses 2004; 29 (05) 365-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schroter RC, Sudlow MF. Flow patterns in models of the human bronchial airways. Respir Physiol 1969; 7 (03) 341-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Koizumi Y, Shoji M, Monde M, Takata Y, Nagai N. Minimum heat flux-film boiling. In: Boiling: Research and Advances. Philadelphia, PA:: Elsevier;; 2017: 369-410
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Doorly DJ, Taylor DJ, Schroter RC. Mechanics of airflow in the human nasal airways. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2008; 163 (1–3): 100-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Li C, Jiang J, Dong H, Zhao K. Computational modeling and validation of human nasal airflow under various breathing conditions. J Biomech 2017; 64 (07) 59-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Subramaniam Ravi P, Richardson Regina B, Morgan Kevin T, Kimbell Julia S, Guilmette Raymond A. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of inspiratory airflow in the human nose and nasopharynx. Inhal Toxicol 1998; 10 (02) 91-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Zhao K, Dalton P. The way the wind blows: implications of modeling nasal airflow. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2007; 7 (02) 117-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Zhao K, Jiang J, Blacker K. et al. Regional peak mucosal cooling predicts the perception of nasal patency. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (03) 589-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Schroeter JD, Kimbell JS, Asgharian B. Analysis of particle deposition in the turbinate and olfactory regions using a human nasal computational fluid dynamics model. J Aerosol Med 2006; 19 (03) 301-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kurtz DB, Zhao K, Hornung DE, Scherer P. Experimental and numerical determination of odorant solubility in nasal and olfactory mucosa. Chem Senses 2004; 29 (09) 763-773
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Zhao K, Dalton P, Yang GC, Scherer PW. Numerical modeling of turbulent and laminar airflow and odorant transport during sniffing in the human and rat nose. Chem Senses 2006; 31 (02) 107-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bailie N, Hanna B, Watterson J, Gallagher G. An overview of numerical modelling of nasal airflow. Rhinology 2006; 44 (01) 53-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zhao K, Jiang J. What is normal nasal airflow? A computational study of 22 healthy adults. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014; 4 (06) 435-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ayodele OJ, Oluwatosin AE, Taiwo OC, Dare AA. Computational fluid dynamics modeling in respiratory airways obstruction: current applications and prospects. Int J Biomed Sci Eng. 2021; 9 (02) 16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zhao K, Blacker K, Luo Y, Bryant B, Jiang J. Perceiving nasal patency through mucosal cooling rather than air temperature or nasal resistance. PLoS One 2011; 6 (10) e24618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cherobin GB, Voegels RL, Pinna FR, Gebrim EMMS, Bailey RS, Garcia GJM. Rhinomanometry versus computational fluid dynamics: correlated, but different techniques. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2021; 35 (02) 245-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Croce C, Fodil R, Durand M. et al. In vitro experiments and numerical simulations of airflow in realistic nasal airway geometry. Ann Biomed Eng 2006; 34 (06) 997-1007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Engelhardt L, Röhm M, Mavoungou C, Schindowski K, Schafmeister A, Simon U. First steps to develop and validate a CFPD model in order to support the design of nose-to-brain delivered biopharmaceuticals. Pharm Res 2016; 33 (06) 1337-1350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Grützenmacher S, Lang C, Mlynski G. The combination of acoustic rhinometry, rhinoresistometry and flow simulation in noses before and after turbinate surgery: a model study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2003; 65 (06) 341-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hebbink RHJ, Wessels BJ, Hagmeijer R, Jain K. Computational analysis of human upper airway aerodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 2023; 61 (02) 541-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lu J, Han D, Zhang L. Accuracy evaluation of a numerical simulation model of nasal airflow. Acta Otolaryngol 2014; 134 (05) 513-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Müller-Wittig W, Mlynsji G, Weinhold I, Bockholt U, Voss G. Nasal airflow diagnosis–comparison of experimental studies and computer simulations. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 85: 311-317
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Mylavarapu G, Murugappan S, Mihaescu M, Kalra M, Khosla S, Gutmark E. Validation of computational fluid dynamics methodology used for human upper airway flow simulations. J Biomech 2009; 42 (10) 1553-1559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Na Y, Chung KS, Chung SK, Kim SK. Effects of single-sided inferior turbinectomy on nasal function and airflow characteristics. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2012; 180 (2–3): 289-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ormiskangas J, Valtonen O, Kivekäs I. et al. Assessment of PIV performance in validating CFD models from nasal cavity CBCT scans. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2020; 282: 103508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Phuong NL, Quang TV, Khoa ND, Kim JW, Ito K. CFD analysis of the flow structure in a monkey upper airway validated by PIV experiments. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2020; 271: 103304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Reid AWN, Chen DH, Wen H. et al. The virtual nose: assessment of static nasal airway obstruction using computational simulations and 3D-printed models. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022; 24 (01) 20-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Weinhold I, Mlynski G. Numerical simulation of airflow in the human nose. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 261 (08) 452-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Xu X, Wu J, Weng W, Fu M. Investigation of inhalation and exhalation flow pattern in a realistic human upper airway model by PIV experiments and CFD simulations. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2020; 19 (05) 1679-1695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Xiong GX, Zhan JM, Jiang HY, Li JF, Rong LW, Xu G. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of airflow in the normal nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Am J Rhinol 2008; 22 (05) 477-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Inthavong K, Ma J, Shang Y. et al. Geometry and airflow dynamics analysis in the nasal cavity during inhalation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2019; 66: 97-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Patel RG, Garcia GJ, Frank-Ito DO, Kimbell JS, Rhee JS. Simulating the nasal cycle with computational fluid dynamics. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152 (02) 353-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Russel SM, Frank-Ito DO. Gender differences in nasal anatomy and function among Caucasians. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2023; 25 (02) 145-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Shah R, Frank-Ito DO. The role of normal nasal morphological variations from race and gender differences on respiratory physiology. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2022; 297: 103823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Taghiloo H, Halimi Z. The frequencies of different types of nasal septum deviation and their effect on increasing the thickness of maxillary sinus mucosa. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect 2019; 13 (03) 208-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lepley TJ, Frusciante RP, Malik J, Farag A, Otto BA, Zhao K. Otolaryngologists' radiological assessment of nasal septum deviation symptomatology. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280 (01) 235-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Malik J, Spector BM, Wu Z. et al. Evidence of nasal cooling and sensory impairments driving patient symptoms with septal deviation. Laryngoscope 2022; 132 (03) 509-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Garcia GJ, Rhee JS, Senior BA, Kimbell JS. Septal deviation and nasal resistance: an investigation using virtual surgery and computational fluid dynamics. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010; 24 (01) e46-e53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Liu T, Han D, Wang J. et al. Effects of septal deviation on the airflow characteristics: using computational fluid dynamics models. Acta Otolaryngol 2012; 132 (03) 290-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Lepley TJ, Wu Z, Root ZT. et al. Can oxymetazoline simulate the outcomes of septoplasty and inferior turbinate reduction surgery?. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13 (05) 961-963
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Lee TS, Goyal P, Li C, Zhao K. Computational fluid dynamics to evaluate the effectiveness of inferior turbinate reduction techniques to improve nasal airflow. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (04) 263-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Kimbell JS, Garcia GJ, Frank DO, Cannon DE, Pawar SS, Rhee JS. Computed nasal resistance compared with patient-reported symptoms in surgically treated nasal airway passages: a preliminary report. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012; 26 (03) e94-e98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Cannon DE, Frank DO, Kimbell JS, Poetker DM, Rhee JS. Modeling nasal physiology changes due to septal perforations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (03) 513-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Farzal Z, Del Signore AG, Zanation AM. et al. A computational fluid dynamics analysis of the effects of size and shape of anterior nasal septal perforations. Rhinology 2019; 57 (02) 153-159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Li C, Maza G, Farag AA. et al. Asymptomatic vs symptomatic septal perforations: a computational fluid dynamics examination. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 9 (08) 883-890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Li L, Han D, Zhang L. et al. Impact of nasal septal perforations of varying sizes and locations on the warming function of the nasal cavity: a computational fluid-dynamics analysis of 5 cases. Ear Nose Throat J 2016; 95 (09) E9-E14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Nomura T, Ushio M, Kondo K. et al Effects of nasal septum perforation repair surgery on three-dimensional airflow: an evaluation using computational fluid dynamics. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2015; Nov; 272: 3327-3333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Otto BA, Li C, Farag AA. et al. Computational fluid dynamics evaluation of posterior septectomy as a viable treatment option for large septal perforations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2017; 7 (07) 718-725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Li C, Farag AA, Leach J. et al. Computational fluid dynamics and trigeminal sensory examinations of empty nose syndrome patients. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (06) E176-E184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Li C, Farag AA, Maza G. et al. Investigation of the abnormal nasal aerodynamics and trigeminal functions among empty nose syndrome patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018; 8 (03) 444-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Malik J, Li C, Maza G. et al. Computational fluid dynamic analysis of aggressive turbinate reductions: is it a culprit of empty nose syndrome?. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 9 (08) 891-899
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Siu J, Inthavong K, Shang Y, Vahaji S, Douglas RG. Aerodynamic impact of total inferior turbinectomy versus inferior turbinoplasty: a computational fluid dynamics study. Rhinology 2020; 58 (04) 349-359
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Maza G, Li C, Krebs JP. et al. Computational fluid dynamics after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery-possible empty nose syndrome in the context of middle turbinate resection. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 9 (02) 204-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Law RH, Ahmed AM, Van Harn M, Craig JR. Middle turbinate resection is unlikely to cause empty nose syndrome in first year postoperatively. Am J Otolaryngol 2021; 42 (04) 102931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Malik J, Thamboo A, Dholakia S. et al. The cotton test redistributes nasal airflow in patients with empty nose syndrome. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020; 10 (04) 539-545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Malik J, Dholakia S, Spector BM. et al. Inferior meatus augmentation procedure (IMAP) normalizes nasal airflow patterns in empty nose syndrome patients via computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2021; 11 (05) 902-909
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Li C, Jiang J, Kim K. et al. Nasal structural and aerodynamic features that may benefit normal olfactory sensitivity. Chem Senses 2018; 43 (04) 229-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Sicard RM, Shah R, Frank-Ito DO. Analyses on the influence of normal nasal morphological variations on odorant transport to the olfactory cleft. Inhal Toxicol 2022; 34 (11–12): 350-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Zhao K, Jiang J, Pribitkin EA. et al. Conductive olfactory losses in chronic rhinosinusitis? A computational fluid dynamics study of 29 patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014; 4 (04) 298-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Zhao K, Pribitkin EA, Cowart BJ, Rosen D, Scherer PW, Dalton P. Numerical modeling of nasal obstruction and endoscopic surgical intervention: outcome to airflow and olfaction. Am J Rhinol 2006; 20 (03) 308-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Lane A, Mullol J, Hopkins C. et al. Dupilumab leads to reduction of anosmia in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 149 (02) AB144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Lepley TJ, Wu Z, Root Z. et al. Computational fluid dynamic modeling of the effect of dupilumab in the management of anosmia secondary to chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2022; 12 (12) 1578-1580
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Sanmiguel-Rojas E, Burgos MA, Esteban-Ortega F. Nasal surgery handled by CFD tools. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 2018; 34 (10) e3126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Rhee JS, Cannon DE, Frank DO, Kimbell JS. Role of virtual surgery in preoperative planning: assessing the individual components of functional nasal airway surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012; 14 (05) 354-359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar