The Structured Menstrual History: Developing a Tool to Facilitate Diagnosis and Aid in Symptom Management

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a prevalent symptom that encompasses abnormalities in menstrual regularity, duration, frequency and/or volume, and it is encountered frequently by both primary care physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists. Research on AUB has used numerous methods to measure bleeding and assess symptoms, but the lack of universally accepted outcome measures hinder the quality of research and the ability of clinical investigators to collaborate in multicenter trials. Similarly, clinical care for women reporting heavy, prolonged, or irregular menstrual bleeding is not optimized because standard ways of evaluating symptoms and change in symptoms over time do not exist. This article describes (1) the current methods of evaluating women with AUB, both in research and clinical care; and (2) offers suggestions for the development of a standardized structured menstrual history for use in both research and clinical care.

REFERENCES

• 1 National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) .Clinical Guideline 44; Heavy menstrual bleeding. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG44FullGuideline.pdf Accessed May 24, 2011
  Google Scholar
• 2 Barnard K, Frayne SM, Skinner KM, Sullivan LM. Health status among women with menstrual symptoms.  J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003;  12 (9) 911-919
  Google Scholar
• 3 Côté I, Jacobs P, Cumming DC. Use of health services associated with increased menstrual loss in the United States.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  188 (2) 343-348
  Google Scholar
• 4 Frick KD, Clark MA, Steinwachs DM, Langenberg P, Stovall D, Munro MG. Dickersin K and the STOP-DUB Research Group. Economic burden of dysfunctional uterine bleeding among women agreeing to obtain surgical treatment.  Womens Health Issues. 2009;  19 (1) 70-78
  Google Scholar
• 5 Liu Z, Doan QV, Blumenthal P, Dubois RW. A systematic review evaluating health-related quality of life, work impairment, and health care costs and utilization in abnormal uterine bleeding.  Value Health. 2007;  10 173-182
  Google Scholar
• 6 Fraser IS, Langham S, Uhl-Hochgraeber K. Health-related quality of life and economic burden of abnormal uterine bleeding.  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;  4 179-189
  Google Scholar
• 7 Hallberg L, Högdahl AM, Nilsson L, Rybo G. Menstrual blood loss—a population study. Variation at different ages and attempts to define normality.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1966;  45 (3) 320-351
  Google Scholar
• 8 Haynes PJ, Hodgson H, Anderson AB, Turnbull AC. Measurement of menstrual blood loss in patients complaining of menorrhagia.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1977;  84 (10) 763-768
  Google Scholar
• 9 Warner PE, Critchley HO, Lumsden MA, Campbell-Brown M, Douglas A, Murray GD. Menorrhagia I: measured blood loss, clinical features, and outcome in women with heavy periods: a survey with follow-up data.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  190 (5) 1216-1223
  Google Scholar
• 10 Hallberg L, Nilsson L. Determination of menstrual blood loss.  Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1964;  16 244-248
  Google Scholar
• 11 O'Flynn N, Britten N. Menorrhagia in general practice—disease or illness.  Soc Sci Med. 2000;  50 (5) 651-661
  Google Scholar
• 12 Clark TJ, Khan KS, Foon R, Pattison H, Bryan S, Gupta JK. Quality of life instruments in studies of menorrhagia: a systematic review.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;  104 (2) 96-104
  Google Scholar
• 13 Wyatt KM, Dimmock PW, Walker TJ, O'Brien PM. Determination of total menstrual blood loss.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  76 (1) 125-131
  Google Scholar
• 14 Higham JM, O'Brien PM, Shaw RW. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;  97 (8) 734-739
  Google Scholar
• 15 Janssen CA, Scholten PC, Heintz AP. A simple visual assessment technique to discriminate between menorrhagia and normal menstrual blood loss.  Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  85 (6) 977-982
  Google Scholar
• 16 Carlson KJ, Miller BA, Fowler Jr FJ. The Maine Women's Health Study: II. Outcomes of nonsurgical management of leiomyomas, abnormal bleeding, and chronic pelvic pain.  Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  83 (4) 566-572
  Google Scholar
• 17 Coulter A, Peto V, Jenkinson C. Quality of life and patient satisfaction following treatment for menorrhagia.  Fam Pract. 1994;  11 (4) 394-401
  Google Scholar
• 18 Ware Jr JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gondek G. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretative Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994
  Google Scholar
• 19 Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric; 2001
  Google Scholar
• 20 McHorney CA, Ware Jr JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.  Med Care. 1993;  31 (3) 247-263
  Google Scholar
• 21 McHorney CA, Ware Jr JE, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.  Med Care. 1994;  32 (1) 40-66
  Google Scholar
• 22 Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD et al.. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.  JAMA. 1989;  262 (7) 907-913
  Google Scholar
• 23 Group TE. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group.  Health Policy. 1990;  16 (3) 199-208
  Google Scholar
• 24 Reid PC, Coker A, Coltart R. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart: a validation study.  BJOG. 2000;  107 (3) 320-322
  Google Scholar
• 25 Matteson KA, Boardman LA, Munro MG, Clark MA. Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measures.  Fertil Steril. 2009;  92 (1) 205-216
  Google Scholar
• 26 Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Chadha YC, Flett GM, Hall MH, Russell IT. Assessment of patients with menorrhagia: how valid is a structured clinical history as a measure of health status?.  Qual Life Res. 1995;  4 (1) 33-40
  Google Scholar
• 27 Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Russell IT. Patient centred assessment of quality of life for patients with four common conditions.  Qual Health Care. 1999;  8 (1) 22-29
  Google Scholar
• 28 Lamping DL, Rowe P. Users' Manual for Purchasers and Providers: Menorrhagia Outcomes Questionnaire (Short Form). London, UK: Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 1995
  Google Scholar
• 29 Lamping DL, Rowe P, Clarke A, Black N, Lessof L. Development and validation of the Menorrhagia Outcomes Questionnaire.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;  105 (7) 766-779
  Google Scholar
• 30 Ware Jr JE, Davies A. Scoring the Short-Form Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corp; 1983
  Google Scholar
• 31 Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.  Med Care. 1992;  30 (6) 473-483
  Google Scholar
• 32 Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Russell IT. SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions.  Qual Health Care. 1994;  3 (4) 186-192
  Google Scholar
• 33 Jenkinson C, Peto V, Coulter A. Measuring change over time: a comparison of results from a global single item of health status and the multi-dimensional SF-36 health status survey questionnaire in patients presenting with menorrhagia.  Qual Life Res. 1994;  3 (5) 317-321
  Google Scholar
• 34 Jenkinson C, Peto V, Coulter A. Making sense of ambiguity: evaluation in internal reliability and face validity of the SF 36 questionnaire in women presenting with menorrhagia.  Qual Health Care. 1996;  5 (1) 9-12
  Google Scholar
• 35 Dilley A, Drews C, Lally C, Austin H, Barnhart E, Evatt B. A survey of gynecologists concerning menorrhagia: perceptions of bleeding disorders as a possible cause.  J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002;  11 (1) 39-44
  Google Scholar
• 36 Matteson K A, Clark M A. Questioning our questions: do frequently asked questions adequately cover the aspects of women's lives most affected by abnormal uterine bleeding? Opinions of women with abnormal uterine bleeding participating in focus group discussions.  Women Health. 2010;  50 (2) 195-211
  Google Scholar
• 37 Wolfe F, Pincus T. Listening to the patient: a practical guide to self-report questionnaires in clinical care.  Arthritis Rheum. 1999;  42 (9) 1797-1808
  Google Scholar
• 38 Pincus T, Oliver AM, Bergmen MJ. How to collect an MDHAQ to provide rheumatology vital signs in the infrastructure of rheumatology care, including some misconceptions regarding the MDHAQ.  Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009;  35 799-812
  Google Scholar
• 39 Russak SM, Croft Jr JD, Furst DE Evidence-Based Medicine Working Groups in Rheumatology et al. The use of rheumatoid arthritis health-related quality of life patient questionnaires in clinical practice: lessons learned.  Arthritis Rheum. 2003;  49 (4) 574-584
  Google Scholar
• 40 Pincus T, Sokka T. Quantitative clinical assessment in busy rheumatology settings: the value of short patient questionnaires.  J Rheumatol. 2008;  35 (7) 1235-1237
  Google Scholar
• 41 Munro MG, Critchley H OD, Fraser IS. The flexible FIGO classification concept of underlying causes of abnormal uterine bleeding.  Sem Reprod Med. 2011;  29 (5) 391-399
  Google Scholar
• 42 Munro MG, Heikinheimo O, Haththotuwa R, Tank J, Fraser IS. The need for investigations to elucidate causes and effects of abnormal uterine bleeding.  Sem Reprod Med. 2011;  29 (5) 410-422
  Google Scholar
• 43 Rahn D D, Abed H, Sung V W et al.. Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting liverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;  64 (3) 293-300
  Google Scholar
• 44 Kadir RA, Economides DL, Sabin CA, Owens D, Lee CA. Frequency of inherited bleeding disorders in women with menorrhagia.  Lancet. 1998;  351 (9101) 485-489
  Google Scholar
• 45 Kouides PA, Conard J, Peyvandi F, Lukes A, Kadir R. Hemostasis and menstruation: appropriate investigation for underlying disorders of hemostasis in women with excessive menstrual bleeding.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  84 (5) 1345-1351
  Google Scholar
• 46 Fraser IS, Critchley HO, Munro MG, Broder M. Writing Group for this Menstrual Agreement Process . A process designed to lead to international agreement on terminologies and definitions used to describe abnormalities of menstrual bleeding.  Fertil Steril. 2007;  87 (3) 466-476
  Google Scholar
• 47 Fraser IS, Critchley HO, Munro MG, Broder M. Can we achieve international agreement on terminologies and definitions used to describe abnormalities of menstrual bleeding?.  Hum Reprod. 2007;  22 (3) 635-643
  Google Scholar
• 48 Garside R, Britten N, Stein K. The experience of heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies.  J Adv Nurs. 2008;  63 (6) 550-562
  Google Scholar
• 49 Marshall J. An exploration of women's concerns about heavy menstrual blood loss and their expectations regarding treatment.  J Reprod Infant Psychol. 1998;  16 259-276
  Google Scholar
• 50 O'Flynn N, Britten N. Diagnosing menstrual disorders: a qualitative study of the approach of primary care professionals.  Br J Gen Pract. 2004;  54 (502) 353-358
  Google Scholar
• 51 Wolfe F, Pincus T, Thompson AK, Doyle J. The assessment of rheumatoid arthritis and the acceptability of self-report questionnaires in clinical practice.  Arthritis Rheum. 2003;  49 (1) 59-63
  Google Scholar
• 52 Munro MG, Broder M, Critchley H OD, Matteson K, Haththotuwa R, Fraser IS. An international response to questions about terminologies, investigation, and management of abnormal uterine bleeding: use of an electronic audience response system.  Sem Reprod Med. 2011;  29 (5) 436-445
  Google Scholar
• 53 Critchley H OD, Munro MG, Broder M, Fraser IS. A five-year international review process concerning terminologies, definitions, and related issues around abnormal uterine bleeding.  Sem Reprod Med. 2011;  29 (5) 377-382
  Google Scholar
• 54 Fraser IS, Critchley H OD, Broder M, Munro MG. The FIGO recommendations on terminologies and definitions for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding.  Sem Reprod Med. 2011;  29 (5) 383-390
  Google Scholar
• 55 O'Flynn N. Menstrual symptoms: the importance of social factors in women's experiences.  Br J Gen Pract. 2006;  56 (533) 950-957
  Google Scholar
• 56 Lieng M, Istre O, Sandvik L, Engh V, Qvigstad E. Clinical effectiveness of transcervical polyp resection in women with endometrial polyps: randomized controlled trial.  J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;  17 (3) 351-357
  Google Scholar
• 57 Malcolm CE, Cumming DC. Does anovulation exist in eumenorrheic women?.  Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  102 (2) 317-318
  Google Scholar
• 58 Shankar M, Lee CA, Sabin CA, Economides DL, Kadir RA. von Willebrand disease in women with menorrhagia: a systematic review.  BJOG. 2004;  111 (7) 734-740
  Google Scholar
• 59 Haththotuwa R, Desai SV, Senanayake L, Goonewardena M, Tank J, Fraser IS. Management of abnormal uterine bleeding in low- and high-resource settings: considerations of cultural issues.  Sem Reprod Med. 2011;  29 (5) 446-458
  Google Scholar
• 60 Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.  Health Technol Assess. 1998;  2 (14) i-iv 1-74
  Google Scholar

Kristen A MattesonM.D. 

Division of Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University

101 Dudley Street, Providence, RI 02905

Email: KMatteson@wihri.org