Space-Time Compatibility Effects in the Auditory Modality
Abstract
Previous research suggests that past and future temporal concepts are spatially represented from left to right along a mental line. And these concepts can both prime motor responses to left or right space and direct visual spatial attention. The present study aimed at investigating the nature of this space-time conceptual metaphor in different auditory tasks. In the first experiment, subjects categorized time-related words (past or future) that were presented binaurally. In the second experiment, subjects detected left-ear or right-ear targets following time-related words. The similar space-time compatibility effects were found in these two experiments. Our results demonstrate that the activation of temporal concepts can both prime motor responses to left or right space and influence the orientation of auditory spatial attention, suggesting that the modality of the stimulus input is unimportant for the left-right mapping of time. These results are explained by the “intermediate coding” account.
References
(2001). Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22.
(2007). Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104, 427–436.
(2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.
(2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555–556.
(2010). Cross-Cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34, 1430–1451.
(2005). The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects. Cognitive Processing, 6, 98–116.
(1997). From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. Newcastle, UK: Lincom Europa.
(2006). Verbal interface design: Do verbal directional cues automatically orient visual spatial attention? Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 733–748.
(2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12, 360–365.
(1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
(2009). The effects of spatial metaphorical representations of time on cognition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 41, 266–271.
(2010). Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 17–24.
(2010). Is the future the right time?. Experimental Psychology, 57, 308–314.
(1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
(1984). Components of visual orienting. In , Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442.
(2004). The metaphor TIME AS SPACE across languages. In , Uebersetzen, interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung – das Leben mit mehreren sprachen: Festschrift fuer Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 226–239). Bochum: Aks-verlag.
(2009). Numbers in the blind’s “Eye”. PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006357.
(2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 512–516.
(2010). In hindsight, life flows from left to right. Psychological Research. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0220-0.
(2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburg, CA: Psychology Software Tools.
(1990). Evidence of semantic satiation: Repeating a category slows subsequent semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 852–861.
(2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745–757.
(2008). Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental time line. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 426–430.
