Space–Time Congruency Effects Using Eye Movements During Processing of Past- and Future-Related Words
Abstract
Abstract. In Western cultures where people read and write from left to right, time is represented along a spatial continuum that goes from left to right (past to future), known as the mental timeline (MTL). In language, this MTL was supported by space–time congruency effects: People are faster to make lexical decisions to words conveying past or future information when left/right manual responses are compatible with the MTL. Alternatively, in cultures where people read from right to left, space–time congruency effects go in the opposite direction. Such cross-cultural differences suggest that repeated writing and reading dynamic movements are critically involved in the spatial representation of time. In most experiments on the space–time congruency effect, participants use their hand for responding, an effector that is associated to the directionality of writing. To investigate the role of the directionality of reading in the space–time congruency effect, we asked participants to make lateralized eye movements (left or right saccades) to indicate whether stimuli were real words or not (lexical decision). Eye movement responses were slower and higher in amplitude for responses incompatible with the direction of the MTL. These results reinforce the claim that repeated directional reading and writing movements promote the embodiment of time-related words.
References
2017). Do potential past and future events activate the left-right mental timeline? Psicológica, 38(2), 231–255.
(1973). Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models. Biometrika, 60(2), 255–265. 10.1093/biomet/60.2.255
(2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press.
(2013). Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 328. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328
(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. ArXiv:1406.5823 [Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823
(1996). The ‘center of gravity’ of words: Evidence for an effect of the word-initial letters. Vision Research, 36(4), 589–603. 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00141-7
(2014). Mapping spatial frames of reference onto time: A review of theoretical accounts and empirical findings. Cognition, 132(3), 342–382. 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.016
(2012). When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(10), 2257–2273. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.007
(2010). Remembrances of times East: Absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian aboriginal Community. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1635–1639. 10.1177/0956797610386621
(2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 9. 10.5334/joc.10
(2014). Spatial language and abstract concepts. WIREs Cognitive Science, 5(2), 139–149. 10.1002/wcs.1271
(2009). Across time, across the body: Transversal temporal gestures. Gesture, 9(2), 181–206. 10.1075/gest.9.2.02coo
(2007). The influence of object-relative visuomotor set on express saccades. Journal of Vision, 7(6), 12. 10.1167/7.6.12
(2015). How strongly linked are mental time and space along the left–right axis?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1878–1883. 10.1037/xlm0000129
(2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford University Press.
(2001). Visual attention: The active vision perspective. In M. Jenkin & L. Harris (Eds.), Vision and attention (pp. 83–103). Springer.
(2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34(8), 1430–1451. 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01105.x
(2006). Contribution of reference frames for movement planning in peripersonal space representation. Experimental Brain Research, 169(1), 24–36. 10.1007/s00221-005-0121-z
(2011). Saccades. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199539789.013.0005
(2022a). Space-time congruency effects using eye movements during processing of past-and future related words. 10.17605/OSF.IO/5EHNC
(2022b). As time goes by: Space-time compatibility effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(2), 304–319. 10.1037/xlm0001007
(2016). SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. 10.1111/2041-210X.12504
(2014). Eye movements during mental time travel follow a diagonal line. Consciousness and Cognition, 30, 201–209. 10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.007
(2012). Space-time compatibility effects in the auditory modality. Experimental Psychology, 59(2), 82–87. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000129
(2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
(2021). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
(2021). performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3139. 10.21105/joss.03139
(2015). Do we map remembrances to the left/back and expectations to the right/front of a mental timeline? Space–time congruency effects with retrospective and prospective verbs. Acta Psychologica, 156, 168–178. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.006
(2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
(2009). Representation of time intervals in the right posterior parietal cortex: Implications for a mental time line. NeuroImage, 46(4), 1173–1179. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.042
(2010). Is the future the right time?. Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 308–314. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000036
(2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
(2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 512–516. 10.3758/BF03194099
(2018). A Replication of ``Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses (Sell & Kaschak, 2011; Experiment 1)”. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 14(1), r8–r11. 10.20982/tqmp.14.1.r008
(1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. 10.1214/aos/1176344136
(2011). Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses. Brain and Language, 117(1), 39–44. 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.003
(2021). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
(2016). Eye movements reveal mental looking through time. Cognitive Science, 40(7), 1648–1670. 10.1111/cogs.12301
(2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 745–757. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_67
(2019). The space-time congruency effect: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Science, 43(1), 1–23. 10.1111/cogs.12709
(