Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57

When Tucker's congruence coefficient is used to assess the similarity of factor interpretations, it is desirable to have a critical congruence level less than unity that can be regarded as indicative of identity of the factors. The literature only reports rules of thumb. The present article repeats and broadens the approach used in the study by Haven and ten Berge (1977). It aims to find a critical congruence level on the basis of judgments of factor similarity by practitioners of factor analysis. Our results suggest that a value in the range .85-.94 corresponds to a fair similarity, while a value higher than .95 implies that the two factors or components compared can be considered equal.

References

  • Acton, G. S. , Schroeder, D. H. (2001). Sensory discrimination as related to general intelligence. Intelligence, 29, 263– 271 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arrindell, W. A. , Bridges, K. R. , Van derEnde, J. , Lawrence, J. S. , Gray, S. L. , Harnish, R. , Rogers, R. , Sanderman, R. (2001). Normative studies with the Scale for Interpersonal Behaviour (SIB): II. US students. A cross-cultural comparison with Dutch data. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 39, 1461– 1479 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. , Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analyses of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588– 606 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Broadbooks, W. J. , Elmore, P. B. (1987). A Monte Carlo study of the sampling distribution of the congruence coefficient. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 47, 1– 11 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burt, C. (1948). The factorial study of temperament traits. British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 1, 178– 203 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. (1978). Matched determines vs. factor invariance: A reply to Korth. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 431– 448 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chan, W. , Ho, R. M. , Leung, K. , Chan, D. K-S. , Yung, Y-F. (1999). An alternative method for evaluating congruence coefficients with Procrustes rotation: A bootstrap procedure. Psychological Methods, 4, 378– 402 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chico, E. , Tous, J. M. , Lorenzo-Seva, U. , Vigil-Colet, A. (2003). Spanish adaptation of Dickman's impulsivity inventory: Its relationship to Eysenck's personality questionnaire. Personality & Individual Differences, 35, 1883– 1892 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Church, A. T. , Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big Five and Tellegen's three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 66, 93– 114 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davenport, E. C. (1990). Significance testing of congruence coefficients: A good idea?. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 50, 289– 296 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferrando, P. J. , Lorenzo, U. (2000). Unrestricted versus restricted factor analysis of multidimensional test items: Some aspects of the problem and some suggestions. Psicológica, 21, 301– 323 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Guadagnoli, E. , Velicer, W. F. (1991). A comparison of pattern matching indices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 323– 343 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern factor analysis . (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Haven, S. , tenBerge, J. M. F. (1977). Tucker's coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: An empirical study. Heymans Bulletin 290 EX. unpublished report by the Department of Psychology, University of Groningen First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hendriks, A. A. J. , Hofstee, W. K. B. , DeRaad, B. (1999). The Five-Factor Inventory (FFPI). Personality & Individual Differences, 27, 307– 325 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. , Wanberg, K. W. , Appel, M. (1973). On the internal structure of the MMPI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 8, 131– 172 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Korf, L. , Malan, J. (2002). Threat to ethnic identity: The experience of white Afrikaans speaking participants in postapartheid South Africa. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 149– 169 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Korth, B. A. (1973). Analytic and experimental analysis of factor matching methods . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Korth, B. A. (1978). A significance test for congruence coefficients for Cattell's factors matched by scanning. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 419– 430 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Korth, B. A. , Tucker, L. R. (1975). The distribution of chance congruence coefficients from simulated data. Psychometrika, 40, 361– 372 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lorenzo-Seva, U. , Ferrando, P. J. (2003). IMINCE: An unrestricted factor-analysis-based program for assessing measurement invariance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 318– 321 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lorenzo-Seva, U. , Kiers, H. A. L. , tenBerge, J. M. F. (2002). Techniques for oblique factor rotation of two or more loading matrices to a mixture of simple structure and optimal agreement. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 55, 337– 360 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacCallum, R. C. , Widaman, K. F. , Zhang, S. , Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84– 99 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R. , Zonderman, A. B. , Costa, P. T. , Bond, M. H. , Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 552– 566 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, L. T. , Vernon, P. A. (1996). Intelligence, reaction time, and working memory in 4 to 6 year old children. Intelligence, 22, 155– 190 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mulaik, S. A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis . New York: McGraw-Hill First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nesselroade, J. R. , Baltes, P. W. (1970). On a dilemma of comparative factor analysis: A study of factor matching based on random data. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 30, 935– 948 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nesselroade, J. R. , Baltes, P. W. , Labouvie, E. W. (1971). Evaluating factor invariance in oblique space: Baseline data generated from random numbers. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 6, 233– 241 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paunonen, S. V. (1997). On chance and factor congruence following orthogonal Procrustes rotation. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 33– 59 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rodríguez-Fornells, A. , Lorenzo-Seva, U. , Andrés-Pueyo, A. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Spanish adaptation of the Five Factor Personality Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 145– 153 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schneewind, K. A. , Cattell, R. B. (1970). Zum problem der Faktorenidentifikation: Verteilungen und Vertrauensintervalle von Kongruenzkoefficienten f r Persönlichkeitsfaktoren im Bereich objektiv-analytischer Tests. [On the problem of the factor identification: Distributions and confidence intervals of congruence coefficients for personality factors in the area of objective analytic tests.]. Psychologische Beiträge, 12, 214– 226 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steer, R. A. , Rissmiller, D. J. , Beck, A. T. (2000). Use of Beck Depression Inventory II with depressed geriatric inpatients. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 38, 311– 318 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984). Washington, DC: Department of the Army First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Valk, A. , Karu, K. (2001). Ethnic attitudes in relation to ethnic pride and ethnic differentiation. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 583– 601 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van deVijver, F. , Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research . London: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar