Item Response Model Investigation of the (German) Interpersonal Reactivity Index Empathy Questionnaire
Implications for Analyses of Group Differences
Abstract
Abstract. The interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) is a widely used personality questionnaire for measuring empathy. We investigated the psychometric properties of the German version using the partial credit model. If this model fits the data, the raw-scores are fair measures of the latent construct. Only in such a case, further analyses based on the raw-scores are accurate and valid. The results showed model fit only for the subscale empathic concern. The subscales perspective taking and fantasy consisted of two theoretically explainable sub-dimensions. For the subscale personal distress, no model fit could be achieved. Our study provides important information on the psychometric qualities of the IRI that has been repeatedly used to assess, for example, group differences. It demonstrates that these analyses were not warranted by the psychometric quality of the questionnaire. Our results provide direct suggestions (e.g., theoretically explainable sub-dimensions) for further developments of the IRI to overcome this limitation.
References
(2009). The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contribution to the Italian validation of the “Basic Empathy Scale”. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 393–408.
(2003). Latent structure of the Davis Interpersonal Reactivity Index in methadone maintenance patients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25, 257–265.
(1973). A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 38, 123–140.
(1997).
The rating scale model . In W. J. van der LindenR. K. HambeltonEds.. Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 67–84). Berlin, Germany: Springer.(2008).
These things called empathy . In J. DecetyW. IckesEds.. The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751–758.
(2013). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, Hove, UK: Psychology Press
(2007). Unidimensionality in the Rasch model: How to detect and interpret. Statistica, 67, 253–261.
(2013).
Linking PISA competencies over three cycles – Results from Germany research on PISA . In M. PrenzelM. KobargK. SchöpsS. RönnebeckEds.. Research on PISA: Research outcomes of the PISA research conference 2009 (pp. 199–213). Berlin, Germany: Springer.(2012). Mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–29.
(2002). Testing unidimensionality in polytomous Rasch models. Psychometrika, 67, 563–574.
(2001). Parents’ judgments and students’ self-judgments of empathy: The structure of empathy and agreement of judgments based on the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 36–47 doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.17.1.36
(2002). The hierarchical structure of empathy: Dimensional organization and relations to social functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 49–59.
(1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
(1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.
(2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. Scientific World Journal, 6, 1146–1163.
(2007). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: How low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscientist, 13, 580–593.
(1997). The emotional contagion scale: A measure of individual differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 131–154.
(2000). Item response theory for psychologists (4,. Hove, UK: Psychology Press).
(2011). Testing the psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) in Chile. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 179–185. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000065
(2007). A synthesis of 15 years of research on DIF in language testing: Methodological advances, challenges, and recommendations. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4, 113–148.
(1995). Some neglected problems in IRT. Psychometrika, 60, 459–487.
(1995). Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York, NY: Springer.
(2011). Measuring empathy in the 21st century: Development of an empathy index rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. Social Work Research, 35, 83–93.
(2013). Assessing dispositional empathy in adults: A French validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 45, 42.
(1995).
Testing the Rasch model . In G. H. FischerI. W. MolenaarEds.. Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications, New York, NY: Springer, 69–95.(2009). Multidimensional IRT models for the assessment of competencies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35, 57–63.
(2011). Skin conductance response to the pain of others predicts later costly helping. PLoS One, 68, e22759. Retrieved from: http://www.plosone.org/article/
(2012). Testing measurement invariance using MIMIC likelihood ratio test with a critical value adjustment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 469–492.
(2012). Das Rasch Modell in der Praxis: Eine Einführung mit eRm
[The Rasch model in practical applications: An introduction with eRm] . Vienna, Austria: facultas.wuv, UTB.(2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 42–58.
(2008). Perspective taking is associated with specific facial responses during empathy for pain. Brain Research, 1227, 153–161.
(2005). Self-transcendence: Conceptualization and measurement. International Journal for Aging and Human Development, 60, 127–143.
(1997). The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 303–324.
(2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 589–611.
(2007). CML based estimation of extended Rasch models with the eRm package in R. Psychology Science, 49, 26.
(2012). eRm: Extended rasch modeling. R package version 0.15.1, Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=eRm
(2011). Does my group know how I feel? Measuring intellectual empathy in groups using the social relations model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 15, 1–15.
(1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.
(1997).
The partial credit model . In W. J. van der LindenR. K. HambletonEds.. Handbook of modern item response theory, New York, NY: Springer, 101–121.(2011). Construct validation of Mexican Empathy Scale yields a unique Mexican Factor. Acta de investigaciòn psicològica, 1, 381–400.
(2009). Inferences about mental states. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1309–1316.
(1995).
Some background for item response theory and the Rasch model . In G. H. FischerI. W. MolenaarEds.. Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 3–14). New York, NY: Springer.(2004). The assessment of alexithymia: Psychometric properties and validity of the Bermond-Vorst alexithymia questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 373–391.
(2009). Der Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragebogen SPF (IRI) zur Messung von Empathie: Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Interpersonal Reactivity Index
[The SPF (IRI) for the measure of empathy: Pschometric evaluation of the german interpersonal reactivity index] . Retrieved from http://psydok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2009/2363(2010). “Feeling” the pain of those who are different from us: Modulation of EEG in the mu/alpha range. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 493–504.
(2014). Affective empathic responses differ in psychopathic and non-psychopathic in carcerated male violent offenders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 16, 1–20.
(2002). Independente und interdependente Selbstkonzepte als Determinanten des Selbstwertes
[Independent and interdependent self-concepts as determinants of self-esteem] . Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 33, 111–121.(2013). Evaluating fidelity to the Wraparound service model for youth: Application of item response theory to the Wraparound Fidelity Index. Psychological Assessment, 25, 583–598.
(2004). The hierarchical structure of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32, 355–359.
. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing from R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
(1960). Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Kopenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
(1997). The past and future of multidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 25–36.
(2007). Cognitive aspects of survey methodology. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 277–287.
(2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annual New York Academy of Science, 1156, 81–96.
(2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not the sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157–1161.
(2005). Validation of the interpersonal reactivity index in a Chinese context. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 118–126.
(2011). R you ready for R?: The CRAN psychometrics task view. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 64, 182–186.
(2001). Testing the unidimensionality assumption of the Rasch model. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 6, 231–271.
(2012). Do personality scale items function differently in people with high and low IQ? Psychological Assessment, 24, 545–555.
(1998). Model selection: Rating Scale Model (RSM) or Partial Credit Model? Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt1231.htm
(1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transaction, 8, 370.
(1990). Computation of OUTFIT and INFIT Statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 3(4), 84–85.
