Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Originalarbeit

Deutsche Adaptation der Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS)

Überprüfung der Konstruktvalidität und Messinvarianz mit explorativen Strukturgleichungsmodellen

Published Online:June 25, 2018https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000206

Abstract

Zusammenfassung. In dieser Studie (N = 759) wurde die deutsche Adaptation der Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS) anhand von explorativen Strukturgleichungsmodellen (Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, ESEM) evaluiert. Die Ergebnisse replizieren die vierfaktorielle Struktur der englischsprachigen Version. Der Modell-Fit des ESEM war akzeptabel und resultierte in gut differenzierten (wenig korrelierten) Faktoren. Die Ergebnisse bestätigen die Reliabilität der Skalen und die partielle Messinvarianz über Geschlecht und unterschiedliche Mannschaftssportarten (Fußball, Rugby / Football, Hockey / Floorball, Basketball und Handball). Die analysierten Geschlechtsunterschiede sowie die Zusammenhänge mit konzeptuell ähnlichen Skalen weisen auf die Konstruktvalidität hin.


German Adaption of the Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS) – Assessment of Construct Validity and Measurement Invariance Via Exploratory Structural Equation Models

Abstract. In this study (N = 759), the German version of the Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS) was evaluated using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). The results support the four-factor solution of the English version. The ESEM model fit to the data was reasonable and yielded fully differentiated (low correlated) factors. Results prove the reliability and the partial measurement invariance over gender and different sports (soccer, rugby / football, hockey / floorball, basketball, and handball). The gender differences analyzed as well as the correlations with conceptually similar scales provide evidence for the construct validity.

Literatur

  • Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 397 – 438. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social Cognitive Theory of Moral Thought and Action. In W. M. KurtinesJ. L. GewirtzEds., Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development. Volume 1: Theory (pp. 45 – 103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanitieS. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193 – 209. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beauducel, A. & Leue, A. (2014). Testing the assumption of uncorrelated errors for short scales by means of structural equation modeling. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 201 – 211. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bierhoff, H.-W. (2007). Prosoziales Verhalten. In K. JonasW. StroebeM. R. C. Hewstone (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie (S. 296 – 327). Heidelberg: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1 – 45. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boardley, I. D. & Kavussanu, M. (2007). Development and validation of the moral disengagement in sport scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 608 – 628. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boardley, I. D. & Kavussanu, M. (2008). The moral disengagement in sport scale - short. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 1507 – 1517. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bockrath, F. (1997). Werteerziehung im Sportunterricht? Sportunterricht, 46(4), 150 – 159. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bockrath, F. & Bahlke, S. (1996). Moral und Sport im Wertebewußtsein Jugendlicher. Über den Zusammenhang von leistungsbezogenen Freizeitaktivitäten mit moralrelevanten Einstellungs- und Urteilsformen. Köln: Sport und Buch Strauß. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Buss, A. H. & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452 – 459. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J. & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456 – 466. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carlo, G., Raffaelli, M., Laible, D. J. & Meyer, K. A. (1999). Why are girls less physically aggressive than boys? Personality and parenting mediators of physical aggression. Sex Roles, 40, 711 – 729. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464 – 504. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J. & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462 – 494. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113 – 126. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duda, J. L. & Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290 – 299. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eisenberg, N. & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Handbook of child psychology. In N. EisenbergEd., Prosocial development. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 701 – 778). NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Espinosa, M. P. & Kovářík, J. (2015). Prosocial behavior and gender. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 88. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Griffin, L. L., Mitchell, S. A. & Oslin, J. L. (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Herzberg, P. Y. (2003a). Der Fragebogen zur Erfassung aggressiver Verhaltensweisen im Straßenverkehr (AViS). Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 45 – 55. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Herzberg, P. Y. (2003b). Faktorstruktur, Gütekriterien und Konstruktvalidität der deutschen Übersetzung des Aggressionsfragebogens von Buss und Perry. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 311 – 323. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Hodge, K. & Lonsdale, C. (2011). Prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport: The role of coaching style, autonomous vs. controlled motivation, and moral disengagement. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, 527 – 547. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rational and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179 – 185. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kavussanu, M. (2008). Moral behaviour in sport: A critical review of the literature. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 124 – 138. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kavussanu, M. & Boardley, I. D. (2009). The prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31, 97 – 117. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kavussanu, M., Boardley, I. D., Sagar, S. S. & Ring, C. (2013). Bracketed morality revisited: How do athletes behave in two contexts? Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 35, 449 – 463. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kavussanu, M., Stanger, N. & Boardley, I. D. (2013). The prosocial and antisocial behaviour in sport scale: Further evidence for construct validity and reliability. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31, 1208 – 1221. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Koller, I. & Lamm, C. (2015). Item response model investigation of the (German) interpersonal reactivity index empathy questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31, 211 – 221. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Levine, M. & Manning, R. (2014). Prosoziales Verhalten. In K. JonasW. StroebeM. HewstoneHrsg., Sozialpsychologie (S. 357 – 400). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Magnaguagno, L., Schmidt, M., Valkanover, S., Sygusch, R. & Conzelmann, A. (2016). Programm- und Outputevaluation einer Intervention zur Förderung des sozialen Selbstkonzepts im Sportunterricht. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 23(2), 56 – 65. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T. & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320 – 341. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D. & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85 – 110. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A. & Morin, A. J. S., et al. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 439 – 476. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B. & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1194 – 1218. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Vallerand, R. J., Lafrenière, M.-A. K., Parker, P., Morin, A. J. S. & Carbonneau, N., et al. (2013). Passion: Does one scale fit all? Construct validity of two-factor passion scale and psychometric invariance over different activities and languages. Psychological Assessment, 25, 796 – 809. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morin, A. J. S., Arens, A. K. & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 116 – 139. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulus, C. (2009). Der Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragebogen SPF(IRI) zur Messung von Empathie: Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Zugriff am 25. 05. 2014. Verfügbar unter http://psydok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2009/2363/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulus, C. (2012). Ist die Bildung eines Empatiescores in der deutschen Fassung des IRI sinnvoll? Zugriff am 21. 03. 2016. Verfügbar unter http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2012/4889/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rethorst, S. & Wehrmann, R. (1998). Der TEOSQ-D zur Messung der Zielorientierungen im Sport. In D. TeipelR. KemperD. HeinemannHrsg., Sportpsychologische Diagnostik, Prognostik, Intervention (S. 57 – 63). Köln: bps-Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. & Eid, M. (2007). Richtlinien für die Übersetzung fremdsprachlicher Messinstrumente. Diagnostica, 53, 1 – 2. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Sevdalis, V. & Raab, M. (2014). Empathy in sports, exercise, and the performing arts. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 173 – 179. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78 – 90. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steinmetz, H. (2010). Estimation and comparison of latent means across cultures. In P. SchmidtJ. BillietE. DavidovHrsg., Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (S. 85 – 116). Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steinmetz, H. (2013). Analyzing observed composite differences across groups: Is partial measurement invariance enough? Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 9, 1 – 12. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Wieczorek, S. & Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality & Quantity, 43, 599 – 616. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: MA: Allyn & Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tisak, M. S., Tisak, J. & Goldstein, S. E. (2006). Aggression, delinquency, and morality: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. KillenJ. G. SmetanaEds., Handbook of moral development (pp. 611 – 632). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zwick, W. R. & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparision of five rules for determining the numbers of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432 – 442. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar