Skip to main content
Original Articles

A Dynamic Systems Approach to Family Assessment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.4.240

Abstract. The dynamic systems approach provides a general framework for studying processes. Properties of that approach are applied to the issue of family assessment. The description covers methods of assessment of short-term processes (e.g., dyadic interaction) and long-term processes (e.g., changes in interaction patterns over years). Special attention is given to the meaning of fluctuation and its relation to transitions and changes of the family system's properties. Two examples of assessment methods and procedures are discussed. One concerns the use of state space representations, the other the design of family studies, encompassing the use of mathematical models of the hypothesized underlying processes.

References

  • Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bullock, B.M. Dishion, T.J. (2002). Sibling collusion and problem behavior in early adolescence: Toward a process model for family mutuality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 143– 153 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Casti, J.L. (1995). Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise . New York: Harper Perennial First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Weerth, C. Van Geert, P.L.C. (2002). Changing patterns of infant behavior and mother-infant interaction: Intra- and interindividual variability. Infant Behavior and Development, 24, 347– 371 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Weerth, C. Van Geert, P.L.C. Hoijtink, H. (1999). Intraindividual variability in infant behavior. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1102– 1112 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dumas, J.E. Lemay, P. Dauwalder, J.P. (2001). Dynamic analyses of mother-child interactions in functional and dysfunctional dyads: A synergetic approach. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 317– 329 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Felmlee, D.H. in press Application of dynamic systems analysis to dyadic interactions. In A. Ong & M. Van Dulmen (Eds.), Handbook of methods in positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Felmlee, D.H. Greenberg, D.H. (1999). A dynamic systems model of dyadic interaction. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23, 155– 180 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fischer, K.W. Bidell, T.R. (1998). Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. In R.M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 467- 561). New York: Wiley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gerris, J.R. de Brock, A.J. Kentges-Kirschbaum, C. (1991). Ein system-ökologisches Prozeß-Modell als Rahmenkonzept der Familienforschung. [A system-ecological process model as a framework for family research] Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 38, 242– 262 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gottman, J.M. Murray, J.D. Swanson, C. Tyson, R. Swanson, K.R. (2003). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Granic, I. (2005, March). Studying typical and distressed families using dynamic systems approaches . Paper presented at the International Conference on Parenting (What can parents do?) at the University of Sussex, UK First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Granic, I. Lamey, A.V. (2002). Combining dynamic systems and multivariate analyses to compare the mother-child interactions of externalizing subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 265– 283 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Granic, I. Hollenstein, T. Dishion, T.J. Patterson, G.R. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of flexibility and reorganization in early adolescence: A dynamic systems study of family interactions. Developmental Psychology, 39, 606– 617 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guastello, S.J. Johnson, E.A. Rieke, M.L. (1999). Nonlinear dynamics of motivational flow. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, & Life Sciences, 3, 259– 273 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haken, H. (1990). Synergetik - eine Einführung. Nichtgleichgewichts-Phasenübergänge und Selbstorganization in Physik, Chemie und Biologie . [Synergetics - An introduction]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Haken, H. (1992). Synergetics in psychology. In W. Tschacher, G. Schiepek, & E.J. Brunner (Eds.), Self-organization and clinical psychology. Empirical approaches to synergetics in psychology (pp. 32-54). Berlin: Springer-Verlag First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Haken, H. (1999). Synergetics and some applications to psychology. In W. Tschacher & J.P. Dauwalder (Eds.), Dynamics, synergetics, autonomous agents. Nonlinear systems approaches to cognitive psychology and cognitive science (pp. 3-12). Singapore: World Scientific First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, E.A. (1991). Perspectives of nonlinear dynamics (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kantor, D. Lehr, W. (1975). Inside the family . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koopmans, M. (1998). Chaos theory and the problem of change in family systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 2, 133– 148 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parrott, L. Kok, R. (2000). Incorporating complexity in ecosystem modeling. Complexity International, 7, 1– 19 ( sol;www.csu.edu.au/ci/vol07/lparro01/) First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pincus, D. (2001). A framework and methodology for the study of nonlinear, self-organizing family dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 5, 139– 173 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rocha, L.M. (1997). Evidence sets and contextual genetic algorithms: Exploring uncertainty, context, and embodiment in cognitive and biological systems . New York, Binghamton University doctoral dissertation First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schiepek, G. (2003). A dynamic systems approach to clinical case formulation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 175– 184 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schiepek, G. Ludwig-Becker, F. Helde, A. Jagdfeld, F. Petzold, E.R. Kroeger, F. (2000). Synergetik für die Praxis: Therapie als Anregung selbstorganisierender Prozesse. [Synergetics for practice: Therapy as a stimulating process of self-organized order transitions] System Familie, 13, 169– 177 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schiepek, G. Tschacher, W. (1997). Selbstorganization in Psychologie und Psychiatrie . [Self-organization in psychology and psychiatry]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Vieweg First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shapiro, E.S. Kratochwill, T.R. (2000). Behavioral assessment in schools: Theory, research, and clinical foundations . New York: Guilford First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Snyder, D.K. Cozzi, J.J. Mangrum, L.F. (2002). Conceptual issues in assessing couples and families. In H.A. Liddle, D.A. Santisteban, R.F. Levant, & J.H. Bray (Eds.), Family psychology. Science-based interventions (pp. 69-87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steenbeek, H.W. Van Geert, P.L.C. in press A dynamic systems model of dyadic play interaction in children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steenbeek, H.W. Van Geert, P.L.C. (submitted). A dynamic systems approach to dyadic interaction in children: Emotional expression, action, dyadic play, and sociometric status . Manuscript submitted for publication First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stormshak, E.A. Dishion, T.J. (2002). An ecological approach to child and family clinical and counseling psychology. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 197– 215 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thelen, E. Smith, L.B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Todman, J.B. Dugard, P. (2001). Single-case and small-n experimental designs: A practical guide to randomization tests . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tschacher, W. Brunner, E.J. (1995). Empirische Studien zur Dynamik von Gruppen aus der Sicht der Selbstorganizationstheorie. [Empirical studies of group dynamics from the point of view of self-organization theory] Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 26, 78– 91 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tschacher, W. Grawe, K. (1996). Selbstorganization in Therapieprozessen: Die Hypothese und empirische Prüfung der “Reduktion von Freiheitsgraden” bei der Entstehung von Therapiesystemen. [Self-organization in therapy processes: An empirical investigation of degrees of freedom in evolving therapy systems] Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie: Forschung und Praxis, 25, 55– 60 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Valsiner, J. (1998). The development of the concept of development: Historical and epistemological perspectives. In R.M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 189- 232). New York: Wiley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van der Maas, H.L.J. Molenaar, P.C.M. (1996). Catastrophe analysis of discontinuous development. In A.A. Van Eye & C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Categorical variables in developmental research: Methods of analysis (pp. 77-105). San Diego, CA: Academic Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Geert, P.L.C. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3– 53 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Geert, P.L.C. (1994). Dynamic systems of development . New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Geert, P.L.C. (1998a). We almost had a great future behind us: The contribution of nonlinear dynamics to developmental-science-in-the-making. Developmental Science, 1, 143– 159 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Geert, P.L.C. (1998b). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky, and beyond. Psychological Review, 105, 634– 677 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Geert, P.L.C. Van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intraindividual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior & Development, 151, 1– 35 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Waldrop, M.M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos . New York: Simon and Schuster First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weisstein, E.W. (1999). CRC concise encyclopedia of mathematics . Boca Raton-New York: CRC Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar