Cook, W.L.
(2005).
The SRM approach to family assessment: An introduction and case
example.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
21,
216–
225
Cone, J.D.
(1999).
Introduction to the special section on self-monitoring: A
major assessment method in clinical psychology.
Psychological Assessment,
11,
411–
414
De Bruyn, E.E.J.
(2005).
Family assessment and methodological issues: Introduction to the
Special Section.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
21,
213–
215
Delsing, M.J.M.H.
Oud, J.H.L.
De Bruyn, E.E.J.
(2005).
Assessment of bidirectional influences between family
relationships and adolescent problem behavior: Discrete versus continuous
time
analysis.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
21,
226–
231
Ebner-Priemer, U.W.
Kubiak, T.
(2007).
Psychological and psychophysiological ambulatory monitoring: A
review on hardware and software solutions.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
23,
214–
226
Ebner-Priemer, U.W.
Sawitzki, G.
(2007).
Ambulatory assessment of affective instability in borderline
personality disorder: The effect of the sampling frequency.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
23,
238–
247
Fahrenberg, J.
Myrtek, M. Eds.
(1996).
Ambulatory assessment .
Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber
Fahrenberg, J.
Myrtek, M. Eds.
(2001).
Progress in ambulatory assessment .
Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber
Fahrenberg, J.
Myrtek, M.
Pawlik, K.
Perrez, M.
(2007a).
Ambulatory assessment - Monitoring behavior in daily life
settings: A behavioral-scientific challenge for psychology.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
23,
206–
213
Fahrenberg, J.
Myrtek, M.
Pawlik, K.
Perrez, M.
(2007b).
Ambulantes Assessment - Verhalten im Alltagskontext
erfassen: Eine verhaltenswissenschaftliche Herausforderung an die
Psychologie.
Psychologische Rundschau,
58,
12–
23
Foster, S.L.
Laverty-Finch, C.
Gizzo, D.P.
Osantowski, J.
(1999).
Practical issues in self-observation.
Psychological Assessment,
11,
426–
438
Haynes, S.N.
Yoshioka, D.T.
(2007).
Clinical assessment applications of ambulatory
biosensors.
Psychological Assessment,
19,
44–
57
Janssens J.M.A.M., De
Bruyn, E.E.J.
Manders, W.A.
Scholte, R.H.J.
(2005).
The multitrait-multimethod approach in family assessment:
Mutual parent-child relationships assessed by questionnaires and
observations.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
21,
232–
239
Kreppner
(2005).
Family assessment and methodological issues: Discussion.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
21,
249–
254
Kubiak, T.
Jonas, C.
(2007).
Applying circular statistics to the analysis of monitoring data:
Patterns of social interactions and mood.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
23,
227–
237
Mehl, M.R.
Holleran, S.E.
(2007).
An empirical analysis of the obtrusiveness of and
participants' compliance with the electronically activated recorder
(EAR).
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
23,
248–
257
Piasecki, T.M.
Hufford, M.R.
Solhan, M.
Trull, T.J.
(2007).
Assessing clients in their natural environments with electronic
diaries: Rationale, benefits, limitations, and barriers.
Psychological Assessment,
19,
25–
43
Reicherts, M.
Salamin, V.
Maggiori, C.
Pauls, K.
(2007).
The learning affect monitor (LAM): A
computer-based system integrating dimensional and discrete assessment of
affective states in daily life.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
23,
268–
277
Van Geert, P.L.C.
Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A.
(2005).
A dynamic systems approach to family assessment.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
21,
240–
248
Westmeyer, H.
(2006).
Editorial: Tradition and innovation.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
22,
1–
3
Wilhelm, P.
Schoebi, D.
(2007).
Assessing mood in daily life: Structural validity, sensitivity
to change, and reliability of a short-scale to measure three basic
dimensions of mood.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
23,
258–
267