The Multitrait-Multimethod Approach in Family Assessment
Abstract
Abstract. A questionnaire and two observation methods were used to assess the parent-child relationship constructs Warmth, Hostility, Respect for Autonomy, and Setting Limits. Family members (father, mother, and one child) were asked to assess each of the other family members on these constructs. The family members were observed during an interaction task and their behavior toward each of the other family members was coded on these constructs, using global ratings and microcodes. The children's problem behavior was rated by both parents. A multitrait-multimethod approach was followed in analyzing the data and interpreting the criterion validity of the relationship measures. Method-variance overshadowed trait-variance and presumably also explained the moderate criterion validity of the questionnaire and the behavior rating method.
References
Achenbach, T.M. McConaughly, S.H. Howell, C.T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213– 232Barbaranelli, C. Caprara, G.V. (2000). Measuring the Big Five in self-report and other ratings: A multitrait-multimethod study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 31– 43Barnes, G.M. Farrell, M.P. Banerjee, S. (1994). Family influences on alcohol abuse and other problem behaviors among black and white adolescents in a general population sample. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4, 183– 201Branje, S.J.T. van Aken, M.A.G.. van Lieshout, C.F.M. (2002). Relational support in families with adolescents. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 351– 362Campbell, D.T. Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81– 105Caprara, G.V. Regalia, C. Scabini, E. Barbaranelli, C. Bandura, A. (2004). Assessment of filial, parental, marital, and collective family efficacy beliefs. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 247– 261Cole, A.D. Truglio, R. Peeke, L. (1997). Relation between symptoms of anxiety and depression in children: A multitrait-multilevel-multigroup assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 110– 119Cook, W.L. (1994). A structural equation model of dyadic relationships within the family system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 500– 509Cook, W.L. (2000). Understanding attachment security in family context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 285– 294Cook, W.L. (2001). Interpersonal influence in family systems: A social relations model analysis. Child Development, 72, 1179– 1197Cook, W.L. (2005). The SRM approach to family assessment: An introduction and case example. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 216– 225Cook, W.L. Dreyer, A.S. (1984). The social relations model: A new approach to the analysis of family-dyadic interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 679– 687Cook, W.L. Kenny, D.A. (2004). The meaning of the family mean. Application of the social relations model to family assessment. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 361– 371Delsing, M.J.M.H. Oud, J.H.L. De Bruyn, E.E.J. van Aken, M.A.G. (2003). Current and recollected perceptions of family relationships: The social relations model approach applied to members of three generations. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 445– 459Delsing, M.J.M.H. Oud, J.H.L. De Bruyn, E.E.J. Scholte, R.H.J. van Aken, M.A.G. in press Family loyalty and adolescent problem behavior: The validity of the family group effect. The Journal of Research on Adolescence,Dishion, T.J. (1990). The family ecology of boys' peer relations in middle childhood. Child Development, 61, 874– 892Ge, X. Best, K.M. Conger, R.D. Simons, R.L. (1996). Parenting behaviors and the occurrence and co-concurrence of adolescent depressive symptoms and conduct problems. Developmental Psychology, 32, 717– 731Jacob, T. Windle, M. (1999). Family assessment: Instrument dimensionality and correspondence across family reporters. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 339– 354Kashy, D.A. Kenny, D.A. (1990). Analysis of family research designs: A model of interdependence. Communication Research, 17, 462– 482Manke, B. Plomin, R. (1997). Adolescent family interactions: A genetic extension of the social relations model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 505– 522Marsh, H.W. Hocevar, D. (1988). A new and more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 107– 117Patterson, G.R. Bank, L. (1986). Bootstrapping your way in the nomological thicket. Behavioral Assessment, 8, 49– 73Rothbaum, F. Weisz, J.R. (1994). Parental caregiving and child externalizing behavior in nonclinical samples. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 55– 74Sattler, J.M. (1992). Assessment of children (3rd. ed.). San Diego, CA: Jerome M. SattlerScholte, R.M.J. van Lieshout, C.F.M. van Aken, M.A.G. (2001). Perceived relational support in adolescence: Dimensions, configurations, and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11, 71– 94Smetana, J.G. Crean, H.F. Daddis, C. (2002). Family processes and problem behaviors in middle-class African-American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 275– 304Stice, E. Barrera, M. (1995). A longitudinal examination of the reciprocal relations between perceived parenting and adolescents' substance use and externalizing behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 31, 322– 334Ten Haaf, P.G.J. Janssens, J.M.A.M. Gerris, J.R.M. (1994). Child-rearing measures: Convergent and discriminant validity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 111– 128Westmeyer, H. (2003). On the structure of case formulations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 210– 216
