Abstract
Abstract. The construct of systemizing – the drive to construct or understand systems – has an important role in the Extreme Male Brain theory of autism. While a brief version of the Systemizing Quotient (SQ) has been proposed, there is a need to assess its psychometric properties. This study assessed factorial and construct validity of an 8-item version of the SQ on a sample of 627 participants. A single-factor latent variable model with a single correlated error term showed adequate fit in a confirmatory factor analysis. This model also demonstrated metric invariance across genders when controlling for an effect of age on item responses. Reliability was acceptable, α = .72. As further evidence for construct validity, SQ scores showed expected relationships with mental rotation performance, trait anxiety, childhood extroversion, childhood agreeableness, and gender. Overall, the results indicated good psychometric properties for the brief version of the SQ, suggesting that this scale could be useful when researchers require a systemizing measure that is minimally burdensome to complete.
References
2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 248–254. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01904-6
(2003). The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 361–374. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1206
(1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005
(2011). MICE: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v45/i03/
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2010). Mental rotation, targeting ability and Baron-Cohen’s empathizing-systemizing theory of sex differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 712–716. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.010
(2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
(2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44, S78–S94. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
(2009). Psychometric analysis of the systemizing quotient (SQ) scale. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 539–552. doi: 10.1348/000712608X368261
(2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4, 73–79. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73
(1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
(2010). Is digit ratio (2D:4D) related to systemizing and empathizing? Evidence from direct finger measurements reported in the BBC internet survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 767–771. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.030
(2012). Are systemizing and autistic traits related to talent and interest in mathematics and engineering? Testing some of the central claims of the empathizing-systemizing theory. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 472–496. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02089.x
(2007). Empathizing and systemizing: What are they, and what do they contribute to our understanding of psychological sex differences? British Journal of Psychology, 98, 237–255. doi: 10.1348/000712606X117612
(1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(2012). Determination of emotional endophenotypes: A validation of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales and further perspectives. Psychological Assessment, 24, 375–385. doi: 10.1037/a0025692
(2013). semTools (Version 0.4-0), Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/semTools/index.html
(2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
(2013). lavaan: Latent variable analysis (Version 0.5-14). Retrieved from http://lavaan.ugent.be/
(1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.
(2010). Short German versions of empathizing and systemizing self-assessment scales. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 239–244. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000028
(1953). A personality scale of manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 48, 285–290. doi: 10.1037/h0056264
(1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–601. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
(2010). Biological and psychosocial correlates of adult gender-variant identities: New findings. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 252–257. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.045
(1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. doi: 10.1007/BF02293557
(2006). Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 929–940. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.017
(2006). Predicting Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) from the Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R) and Empathy Quotient (EQ). Brain Research, 1079, 47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.012
(