Mask-Induced Priming and the Negative Compatibility Effect
Abstract
Abstract. Under certain conditions, masked primes have produced counter-intuitive negative compatibility effects (NCE), such that RT is increased, not decreased, when the target is similar to the prime. This NCE has been interpreted as an index of automatic motor inhibition, triggered to suppress the partial motor activation caused by the prime. An alternative explanation is that perceptual interactions between prime and mask produce positive priming in the opposite direction to the prime, explaining the NCE without postulating inhibition. Here the potential role of this “mask-induced priming” was investigated in two experiments, using masks composed of random lines. Experiment 1 compared masks that included features of the primes and targets with masks that did not. The former should create more mask-induced priming, but the NCE did not differ between masks. Experiment 2 employed masks that contained features of either one target or the other, but not both. These asymmetric masks produced significant mask-induced priming, but it was insufficient in size to account for the prime-related NCE. Thus mask composition can contribute to NCEs, but when random line masks are employed, the major source of the NCE seems to be motor-inhibition.
References
(1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 266– 278
(2003). Inhibition of subliminally primed responses is mediated by the caudate and thalamus: Evidence from functional MRI and Huntington's disease. Brain, 126, 713– 723
(1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737– 1747
(2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 514– 520
(2003). Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology, 64, 7– 26
(2001). Perception and preference in short-term word priming. Psychological Review, 108, 652–
(2002). Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming: 1. Effects of prime duration and prime recognition. Memory and Cognition, 30, 745– 757
(2007). The effect of nonmasking distractors on the priming of motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 456– 468
(2005). On the role of mask structure in subliminal priming. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 65, 409– 417
(2005). Two versions of the negative compatibility effect: Comment on Lleras and Enns (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 431– 435
(2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255– 269
(2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880– 913
(2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475– 493
(2005). Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: Reply to Klapp (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 436– 440
(2006). How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming: A reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 495– 500
(2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 416– 424
(2005). The neurophysiology of response competition: Motor cortex activation and inhibition following subliminal response priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 483– 493
(2006). Dissociating local and global levels of perceptuo-motor control in masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 618– 632
(2000). A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1367– 1382
(2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 148– 162
(2004). Masked prime stimuli can bias “free” choices between response alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 463– 468
(2006). Active masks and active inhibition: A comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 484– 494
(2004). The basal ganglia and inhibitory mechanisms in response selection: Evidence from subliminal priming of motor responses in Parkinson's disease. Brain, 127, 330– 339
(2006). Time-course of masked response priming and inhibition in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 44, 869– 875
(2007). Negative and positive masked-priming - implications for motor inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 317– 326
(2006). Attentional modulation of sensorimotor processes in the absence of perceptual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 103, 10520– 10525
(2004). Qualitative differences between conscious and nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 494– 515
