Randall H. Trigg
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we look at how people working in a governmental labor inspection agency tailor their shared PC environment. Starting with standard off-the-shelf software, the tailors adapt that software to the particular workplace in which they are embedded, at the same time that they modify and extend the practices of that workplace. Over time, their adaptations and the tailoring processes themselves become structured and systematized within the organization. This tendency toward systematization is in part a response to the requirement that the results of tailoring be sharable across groups of users. Our study focuses on several dimensions of the work of tailoring: construction, organizational change, learning, and politics. We draw two kinds of lessons for system development: how better to support the work of tailors, and how system developers can learn from and cooperate with tailors.
- 1.Andersen, N.E., Kensing, F., Lundin, ,I., Mathiassen, L., Munk-Madsen, L., Rasbech, M., and S0rgaard, P. Professional Systems Development: Experience, ideas and action. Prentice Hall, New York, 1990. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.Anzaldua, G. Borderlands - La Frontera. San Francisco, Aunt Lute Books, 1987.Google Scholar
- 3.B0dker, S. Through the Interface--A Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.B0dker, S. Technology as a vehicle for organisafional learning and change. First Socio-Cultural Research Conference (Madrid). (DAIMI No. PB-425). Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, Denmark, 1992.Google Scholar
- 5.B0dker, S, Historical analysis and conflicting perspectives--contextualizing HCI. In L. Bass, j. Gomostaev, and C. Unger (Eds.), Proceedings of EWHCI '93, vol. i., 1993, pp. 132-142. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.B0dker, S., Christiansen, E., Ehn, P., Markussen, R., Mogensen, P., and Trigg, R. The AT-Project: Practical research in cooperative design. (DAIMI No. PB-454). Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, Denmark, 1993.Google Scholar
- 7.B0dker, S., Ehn, P., Kammersgaard, J., Kyng, M., and Sundblad, Y. A UTOPIAN experience: On design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphical workers, in G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng (Eds.), Computers and Democracy--A Scandinavian Challenge (pp. 251-278). A vebury, Aldershot, England, 1987.Google Scholar
- 8.Brown, J.S., and Duguid, P. Borderline issues: Social and material aspects of design. Human-Computer Interaction, 1994, in press.Google Scholar
- 9.Engestrom, Y. Interactive Expertise" Studies in Distributed Working Intelligence. (Research Bulletin No. 83). Department of Education, Helsinki University, 1992.Google Scholar
- 10.Gantt, M., and Nardi, B.A. Gardeners and gurus: Patterns of cooperation among CAD users. In Proceedings CHI '92 (May 3-7, Monterey, CA), ACM, 1992, pp. 107-117. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Greenbaum, J., and Kyng, M., Eds. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Hughes, j.A., and King, V. Paperwork. COMIC Report, University of Lancaster, 1993.Google Scholar
- 13.Kiczales, G., and Lamping, J. Issues in the design and specification of class libraries. In Proceedings of OOPSLA'92 (1992). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.Kyng, M. Designing for cooperation: Cooperating in design. Communications of the ACM 34, 12 (1991), 64-73. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.Kyng, M. Making representations work. In L. Suchman (Ed.), Representations of Work. (Honolulu, Hawaii). Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1994, pp. 19-35.Google Scholar
- 16.Lave, J. and Wenger, E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 17.Mackay, W.E. Patterns of sharing customizable software. In ACM CSCW'90 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. (Portland, Oregon). ACM Press, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.MacLean, A., Carter, K., Lovstrand, L. and Moran, T. User-tailorable systems" Pressing the issues with buttons. In Proceedings of ACM CHI'90 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1990, pp. 175-182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.Markussen, R. A historical perspective on work practices and technology. In P.B. Anderson, B. Holmqvist, and J.F. Jensen (Eds.), The Computer as a Medium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1994 (in press). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Nardi, B., and Miller, J. Twinkling lights and nested loops: Distributed problem solving and spreadsheet development. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34 (i 991), 161-184. Google Scholar
- 21.Nardi, B.A. A Small Matter of Programming: Perspectives on End User Computing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.Naur, P. Programming as theory building. In Computing: A Human Activity. ACM Press, 1992, 37-48.Google Scholar
- 23.Okamura, K., Fujimoto, M., Orlikowski, W.J., and Yates, J. Helping CSCW applications succeed: The role of mediators in the context of use. in Proceedings of ACM CSCW'94 Conference on Computer- Supported Cooperative Work. 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24.Suchman, L.A. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25.Trigg, R.H., B0dker,S., and Gr0nbaek, K. Open-ended interaction in cooperative prototyping: A video-based analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 3 (1991), 63-86. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26.Trigg, R.H., Moran, T.P., and Halasz, F.G. Adaptability and tailorability in NoteCards. In Proceedings of lFIP INTERACT'87: Human-Computer interaction. 1987, pp. 723-728.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- From implementation to design: tailoring and the emergence of systematization in CSCW
Recommendations
End-User Highlighted: featuring tailorable systems development
IHC '21: Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSoftware varies in the domain and has different target users. Also, it is not possible to predict all users' requirements at the system development stage. This situation sheds light on the need to support end-users to adapt their applications to cope ...
Sensemaking in Technology-Use Mediation: Adapting Groupware Technology in Organizations
Understanding how people in organizations appropriate and adapt groupware technologies to local contexts of use is a key issue for CSCW research, since it is critical to the success of these technologies. In this paper, we argue that the appropriation ...
Users as Composers: Parts and Features as a Basis for Tailorability in CSCW Systems
Tailoring CSCW systems by composing components has received some attention in the last few years. The underlying ideas and techniques usually come from the domain of software engineering. We take a closer look at the specific situation and requirements ...
Comments