Abstract
The Simon effect consists of a faster and a more accurate performance when spatial responses correspond to irrelevant-spatial stimuli than when they do not. The time course of the Simon effect was investigated using centrally presented conventional signals (arrows and spatial words) conveying spatial information through iconic-symbolic (Experiments 1 and 2) and semantic (Experiment 3) codes. Time-demanding object-inherent and semantic spatial codes were generated for arrows and words, respectively. This resulted in Simon effects increasing in size across increasing response times (RTs). However, different onsets of the Simon effect were displayed across RT distributions. For arrows, the Simon effect was already significant at the fastest RT intervals, providing clear evidence that they are distinctively more effective directional indicators compared to words.
References
(2003a). Influences of response-activating stimuli and passage of time on the Simon effect. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 67, 174–183.
(2003b). Spatial Simon effects and compatibility effects induced by observed gaze direction. Visual Cognition, 10, 363–383.
(1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 32–55.
(2007). Response coding and visuomotor transformation in the Simon task: The role of action goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1269–1282.
(1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.
(2006). Visual attention and the semantics of space: Beyond central and peripheral cues. Psychological Science, 17, 622–627.
(1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290.
(1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546–571.
(2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12, 360–365.
(1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.
(1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.
(2001). Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: Effects of S-R associations strength and relative timing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 95–136.
(2000). An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. Psychophysiology, 37, 464–472.
(1992). Response time distributions and the Stroop task: A test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 872–882.
(2000). Mixing incompatibly mapped location-relevant trials with location-irrelevant trials: Effects of stimulus mode on the reverse Simon effect. Psychological Research, 64, 11–24.
(1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461.
(2007). Spatial coding and central patterns: Is there something special about the eyes? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 79–90.
(2006). Attention to arrows: Pointing to a new direction. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1921–1930.
(1996). Multiple Spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice reaction tasks. Psychological Research, 59, 196–211.
(2003). Intrahemispherical activation, visuomotor transmission, and the Simon effect: Comment on Wascher et al. (2001). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 152–158.
(2004). Does the Simon effect affect movement execution? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 825–840.
(1990). In , Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
(2006). Software for generating psychological experiments. Experimental Psychology, 53, 218–232.
(1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In , Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
(1999). Spatial S-R compatibility with centrally presented stimuli: An event-related asymmetry study on dimensional overlap. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 214–229.
(2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 731–751.
(2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453–464.
(2007). Response coding in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 71, 401–410.
(2003). Automatic spatial coding of perceived gaze direction is revealed by the Simon effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 423–429.
