Abstract
According to theories brought forward recently, implicit measures based on reaction times, for instance Implicit Association Tests (IATs), should predict spontaneous behavior better than explicit measures. We applied five IATs to the measurement of the Big Five personality factors and tested whether the IATs predicted spontaneous behavior. The results show that, although implicit and explicit measures of personality dimensions were related at times, the correlations between them and with behavior suggest that these constructs should be differentiated. IATs predicted spontaneous behavior, but explicit measures did not. In contrast, explicit measures, but not IATs, were related to transparent self-ratings of behavior.
References
Asendorpf, J.B. Banse, R. Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380– 393Banaji, M.R. (2001). Implicit attitudes can be measured. In H.L. Roediger, III & J.S. Nairne (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder. Science conference series (pp. 117-150). Washington, DC: American Psychological AssociationBanse, R. Seise, J. Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 145– 160Borkenau, P. Mauer, N. Riemann, R. Spinath, F.M. Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599– 614Borkenau, P. Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-FFI. Neo-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar nach Costa und McCrae - deutsche Fassung . [Neo Five Factor Inventory acc. to Costa and McCrae - German version]. Göttingen: HogrefeBrickenkamp, R. (1981). Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test d2 . [d2 Test of Attention]. Göttingen: HogrefeBuchner, A. Irmen, L. Erdfelder, E. (1996). On the irrelevance of semantic information for the “Irrelevant Speech” effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 765– 779Burger, J.M. Caldwell, D.F. (2000). Personality, social activities, job-search behavior and interview success: Distinguishing between PANAS trait positive affect and NEO extraversion. Motivation and Emotion, 24, 51– 62Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (revised ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumDe Houwer, J. (2002). The Implicit Association Test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: Strengths and limitations. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 33, 115– 133Devos, T. Banaji, M.R. (2005). American = White?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447– 466Egloff, B. Schmukle, S.C. (2002). Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441– 1455Fazio, R.H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115– 141Fazio, R.H. Olson, M.A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297– 327Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability, and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 385– 400Gawronski, B. Conrey, F.R. (2004). Der Implizite Assoziationstest als Maß automatisch aktivierter Assoziationen: Reichweite und Grenzen. [The Implicit Association Test as a measure of automatically activated associations: Range and limits] Psychologische Rundschau, 55, 118– 126Greenwald, A.G. McGhee, D.E. Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464– 1480Greenwald, A.G. Nosek, B.A. Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197– 216Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513– 541McCrae, R.R. Costa, P.T. (1999). A Five-Factor theory of personality. In L.A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed. pp. 139-153). New York: GuilfordMcFarland, S.G. Crouch, Z. (2002). A cognitive skill confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20, 483– 510Mierke, J. Klauer, K.C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107– 122Mount, M.K. Barrick, M.R. Strauss, J.P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 272– 280Nederhof, A.J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263– 280Scandell, D.J. Wlazelek, B. (1999). The relationship between self-perceived personality and impression management on the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 147– 154Schnabel, K. Banse, R. Asendorpf, J.B. (in press). Assessment of implicit personality self-concept using the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Concurrent assessment of anxiousness and angriness. British Journal of Social Psychology,Schwenkmezger, P. (1995). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar. [Neo Five Factor Inventory] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 237– 238Steffens, M.C. (1999). Mac-IAT [Computer program]. Trier: Universität TrierSteffens, M.C. (2004). Is the Implicit Association Test immune to faking?. Experimental Psychology, 51, 165– 179Steffens, M.C. (2005). Implicit and explicit attitudes towards lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 49, 39– 66Steffens, M.C. Buchner, A. (2003). Implicit Association Test: Separating transsituationally stable and variable components of attitudes toward gay men. Experimental Psychology, 50, 33– 48Steffens, M.C. Jelenec, P. Anheuser, J. Goergens, N.K. Lichau, J. Still, Y. (2004). A two-factor model of reaction time differences in the Implicit Association Test . Manuscript submitted for publicationSteffens, M.C. Kirschbaum, M. Glados, P. (2004). Avoiding stimulus effects in the Implicit Association Test: The Concept Association Task . Manuscript submitted for publicationSteffens, M.C. Lichau, J. Still, Y. Jelenec, P. Anheuser, J. Goergens, N.K. Hülsebusch, T. (2004). Individuum oder Gruppe, Exemplar oder Kategorie? Ein Zweifaktorenmodell zur Erklärung der Reaktionszeitunterschiede im Implicit Association Test (IAT). [Individual or group, exemplar or category? A two-factor model for explaining reaction-time differences in the Implicit Association Test (IAT)] Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212, 57– 65Steffens, M.C. Plewe, I. (2001). Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 123– 134