skip to main content
10.1145/192844.192861acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Supporting distributed groups with a Montage of lightweight interactions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 October 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Montage prototype provides lightweight audio-video glances among distributed collaborators and integrates other applications for coordinating future contact. We studied a distributed group across three conditions: before installing Montage, with Montage, and after removing Montage. We collected quantitative measures of usage as well as video-tape and user perception data. We found that the group used Montage glances for short, lightweight interactions that were like face-to-face conversations in many respects. Yet like the phone, Montage offered convenient access to other people without leaving the office. Most glances revealed that the person was not available, so it was important to integrate other tools for coordinating future interaction. Montage did not appear to displace the use of e-mail, voice-mail, or scheduled meetings.

References

  1. Clark, Herbert H., "Chapter 18: Language Use and Language Users", The Handbook of Social Psychology, Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson (Eds.), New York: Harper and Row, 1985, pp. 179-229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dourish, Paul and Sara Bly, "Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed Work Group", Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI) '92, Monterey, CA, May 1992, pp. 541-547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Fish, Robert S., Robert E. Kraut, Robert W. Root, Ronald E. Rice, "Video Informal Communication", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 36, No. 1, January 1993, pp. 48-61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Grosz, Barbara J. and C. L. Sidner, "Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse", Computational Linguistics, 12, 1986, pp. 175-204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Heath, Christian and Paul Luff, "Media Space and Communicative Asymmetries" Preliminary Observations of Video- Mediated Interaction", Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, 1992, pp. 315-346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Isaacs, Ellen, A. and John C. Tang, "What Video Can and Can't Do for Collaboration: A Case Study", Proceedings A CM Multimedia '93, August 1993, Anaheim, CA, pp. 199- 206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kraut, Robert E., Carmen Egido, and Jolene Galegher, "Patterns of contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaboration", Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, Jolene Galegher, Robert E. Kraut, Carmen Egido (Eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1990, pp. 149- 171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Rice, Ronald E. and Douglas E. Shook, "Voice Messaging, Coordination, and Communication", intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, Jolene Galegher, Robert E. Kraut, Carmen Egido (Eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1990, pp. 327-350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Root, Robert W., "Design of a Multi-Media Vehicle for Social Browsing", Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Portland, OR, September 1988, pp. 25-38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Schegloff, Emanual A., "Sequencing in Conversational Openings", Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, J. J. Gumperz & D. H. Hymes (Eds.), New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1972, pp. 346-380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tang, John C. and Ellen A. Isaacs, "Why Do Users Like Video? Studies of Multimedia-Supported Collaboration", Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal, Vol. 1, Issue 3, 1993, pp. 163-196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Tang, John C. and Monica Rua, "Montage: Providing Teleproximity for Distributed Groups", Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI) '94, Boston, MA, April 1994, pp. 37-43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Whittaker, Steve, David Frohlich, and Owen Daly-Jones, "informal workplace communications: What is it like and how might we support it?", Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI) '94, Boston, MA, April 1994, pp. 131-137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Supporting distributed groups with a Montage of lightweight interactions

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CSCW '94: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
            October 1994
            464 pages
            ISBN:0897916891
            DOI:10.1145/192844

            Copyright © 1994 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 22 October 1994

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            CSCW '94 Paper Acceptance Rate42of200submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

            Upcoming Conference

            CSCW '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader