skip to main content
10.1145/192844.192858acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Life and death of new technology: task, utility and social influences on the use of a communication medium

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 October 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

This field experiment investigates individual, structural and social influences on the use of two video telephone systems. One system flourished, while an equivalent system died. We use a time series design and multiple data sources to test media richness theory, critical mass theory, and social influence theories about new media use. Results show that the fit between tasks and features of the communications medium influences use to a degree, but cannot explain why only one system survived. Critical mass—the numbers of people one can reach on a system—and social influence—the norms that grow up around a new medium—can explain this phenomenon.

References

  1. 1.Bikson, T. Understanding the implementation of office technology. In R.E. Kraut (Ed.), Technology and the Transformation of White-Collar Work (pp. 155-176). Lawrence Eflbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Cammann, C., Fishman, M., Jenkins, Jr., D., and Klesh, J. R. Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S.E. Seashore, E. Lawler, P.H. Mirvis, and C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing Organizational Change (pp. 71-138). John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Cool, C., Fish, R.S, Kraut, R.E~, and Lowery, C. Iterative design of video communication systems. In J. Turner and R.E. Kraut (Eds.), CSCW ~92: Sharing Perspectives. (Nov., Toronto, Canada). ACM Publications, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 25- 32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32, 5 (1986), 554-571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Fish, R., Kraut, R., Root, R., & Rice, R.E. Video as a technology for informal communication. Communications of the ACM 36, 1 (1993), 48-61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Fulk, J. Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Review 36, 5 (1993), 921-950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Fulk, J., and Stein_field, C. A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (F_zts.) Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 117-142). Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Greene, W. H. LIMDEP, Version 6.0. Econometric Software, Inc., BeUport, N.Y.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Johnson, B. & Rice, R. Managing Organizational Innovation: The Evolution from Word Processing to Office Information Systems. Columbia University Press, New York, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Kraut, R. E., Galegher, J., Fish, R. S., and Chalfonte, B. Task requirements and media choice in collaborative writing.Human-Computer Interaction. 7 (1992), 375-408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Lawrence, P. and Lorsch, J. Organization and Environment. Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Markus, M.L. Toward a critical mass theory of interactive media" Universal access, interdependence and diffusion. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 194-218). Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Noll, A. Michael. Anatomy of a failure: Picturephone revisited. Telecommunications Policy (May/June 1992), 307-316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Perrow, C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review 32 (1967), 194-208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. 15.Poole, M. S., and DeSanctis, G. Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 173-193). Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Rice, R.E. Computer-mediated communication system network data: Theoretical concerns and empirical examples. International Journal of Man- Machine Studies 30 (1990), 627-647. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Tornatzky, L. and Klein, K. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoptionimplementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EMo29 (1982), 28-45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. 18.Tushman, M. Technical communication in R&D laboratories" The impact of project work characteristics. Academy of Management Journal 21 (1978), 624-645.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Withey, M., Daft, R., and Cooper, W. Measures of Perrow's work unit technology: An empirical assessment and a new scale. Academy of Management Review 26 (1983), 45-63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Van de Ven, A., Delbeeq, A., and Koenig, R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review 41 (1976), 322-338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Life and death of new technology: task, utility and social influences on the use of a communication medium

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CSCW '94: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
        October 1994
        464 pages
        ISBN:0897916891
        DOI:10.1145/192844

        Copyright © 1994 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 October 1994

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CSCW '94 Paper Acceptance Rate42of200submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CSCW '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader