Evaluative Stimulus (In)Congruency Impacts Performance in an Unrelated Task
Evidence for a Resource-Based Account of Evaluative Priming
Abstract
In two experiments, we assessed evaluative priming effects in a task that was unrelated to the congruent or incongruent stimulus pairs. In each trial, participants saw two valent (positive or negative) pictures that formed evaluatively congruent or incongruent stimulus pairs and a letter that was superimposed on the second picture. Different from typical evaluative priming studies, participants were not required to respond to the second of the valent stimuli, but asked to categorize the letter that was superimposed on the second picture. We assessed the impact of the evaluative (in)congruency of the two pictures on the performance in responding to the letter. In addition, we manipulated attention to the evaluative dimension by asking participants in one experimental group to respond to the valence of the pictures on a subset of trials (evaluative task condition). In both experiments, we found evaluative priming effects in letter categorization responses: Participants categorized the letter faster (and sometimes more correctly) in trials with congruent picture-pairs. These effects were present only in the evaluative task condition. These findings can be explained with different resource-based accounts of evaluative priming and the additional assumption that attention to valence is necessary for evaluative congruency to affect processing resources. According to resource-based accounts valence-incongruent trials require more cognitive resources than valence-congruent trials (e.g., Hermans, Van den Broeck, & Eelen, 1998).
References
1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 104–128. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1996.0005
(2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
(2003). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In , The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 227–252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2002). Affective priming of semantic categorisation responses. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 643–666. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000419
(2001). Affective priming of pronunciation responses: Effects of target degradation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 85–91. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1437
(2011). If it’s hard to read… try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments. Psychological Research, 75, 376–383. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0319-y
(2011). On the (un)conditionality of automatic attitude activation: The valence proportion effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 125–132. doi: 10.1037/a0022316
(2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115–141. doi: 10.1080/02699930125908
(1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
(2006). Backward affective priming: Even when the prime is late, people still evaluate. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 799–806. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.003
(1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
(1994). The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memory. Cognition & Emotion, 8, 515–533. doi: 10.1080/02699939408408957
(1998). Affective priming using a color-naming task: A test of an affective-motivational account of affective priming effects. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 45, 136–148.
(1992). Semantic and emotional priming below objective detection threshold. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 113–128. doi: 10.1080/02699939208411062
(2009). Spontaneous evaluations. In , Social cognition: The basis of human interaction (pp. 199–217). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2001). Does sunshine prime loyal? Affective priming in the naming task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A-Human Experimental Psychology, 54, 727–751. doi: 10.1080/02724980042000444
(2002). Goal-dependent and goal-independent effects of irrelevant evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 802–814. doi: 10.1177/0146167202289009
(2003). Affective priming: Findings and theories. In , The psychology of evaluation (pp. 7–49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(1997). List-context effects in evaluative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 246–255. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.1.246
(2000). Mechanisms of unconscious priming: I. Response competition, not spreading activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 441–455. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.441
(1998). Ein fairer Test für die Aktivationsausbreitungshypothese: Untersuchung affektiver Kongruenzeffekte in der Stroop-Aufgabe
([An unbiased test of a spreading activation account of affective priming: Analysis of affective congruency effects in the Stroop task] . Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 45, 120–135.2011). Now you see it, now you don’t: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. Acta Psychologica, 138, 176–186. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.002
(2012). Evaluative priming of naming and semantic categorization responses revisited: A mutual facilitation explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 984–1000. doi: 10.1037/a0026779
(2012). Unconscious semantic activation depends on feature-specific attention allocation. Cognition, 122, 91–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.017
(2009). Modulation of automatic semantic priming by feature-specific attention allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 37–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.03.004
(2007). Affective priming of nonaffective semantic categorization responses. Experimental Psychology, 54, 44–53. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.44
(2002). On the nature of the affective priming effect: Affective priming of naming responses. Social Cognition, 20, 227–256.
(2004). Non-associative semantic priming: Episodic affective priming of naming responses. Acta Psychologica, 116, 39–54.
(2007). On the nature of the affective priming effect: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and congruency proportion in naming and evaluative categorization. Memory & Cognition, 35, 95–106. doi: 10.3758/bf03195946
(2004). On the replicability of the affective priming effect in the pronunciation task. Experimental Psychology, 51, 109–115. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.51.2.109
(1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley.
(2013). Cognitive processes in associative and categorical priming: A diffusion model analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 536–559. doi: 10.1037/a0029459
(2008). Response-bound primes diminish affective priming in the naming task. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 374–384. doi: 10.1080/02699930701446064
(2013). Attention please: No affective priming effects in a valent/neutral-categorization task. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 119–132. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.711744
(