Cross-Modal Distraction by Deviance
Functional Similarities Between the Auditory and Tactile Modalities
Abstract
Unexpected task-irrelevant changes in the auditory or visual sensory channels have been shown to capture attention in an ineluctable manner and distract participants away from ongoing auditory or visual categorization tasks. We extend the study of this phenomenon by reporting the first within-participant comparison of deviance distraction in the tactile and auditory modalities. Using vibro-tactile-visual and auditory-visual cross-modal oddball tasks, we found that unexpected changes in the tactile and auditory modalities produced a number of functional similarities: A negative impact of distracter deviance on performance in the ongoing visual task, distraction on the subsequent trial (post-deviance distraction), and a similar decrease – but not the disappearance – of these effects across blocks. Despite these functional similarities, deviance distraction only correlated between the auditory and tactile modalities for the accuracy-based measure of deviance distraction and not for response latencies. Post-deviance distraction showed no correlation between modalities. Overall, the results suggest that behavioral deviance distraction may be underpinned by both modality-specific and multimodal mechanisms, while post-deviance distraction may predominantly relate to modality-specific processes.
References
(2000). Increased distractibility by task-irrelevant sound changes in abstinent alcoholics. Clinical Experimental Research, 24, 1850–1854.
(1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 899–912.
(1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9, 321–324.
(2010). The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2130–2139.
(2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1664–1677.
(2008). Cognitive control after distraction: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology, 45, 608–620.
(2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: Behavioral and event-related indices. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 265–273.
(2003). Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: Evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1119–1122.
(2004). Distraction effects in vision: Behavioral and event-related potential indices. NeuroReport, 15, 665–669.
(2006). Visual distraction: A behavioral and event-related brain potential study in humans. NeuroReport, 17, 151–155.
(2009). Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 46, 645–654.
(2010). Differences in processing violations of sequential and feature regularities as revealed by visual event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 1317, 192–202.
(2010). Tactile capture of auditory localization is modulated by hand posture. Experimental Psychology, 57, 267–274.
(2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114, 356–371.
(1991). Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 875–887.
(2000). A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 277–283.
(1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590–604.
(2005). Covert attention in touch: Behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits. Psychophysiology, 42, 171–179.
(2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355–373.
(2011). Task requirements change signal strength of the primary somatosensory M50: Oddball vs. one-back tasks. Psychophysiology, 48, 569–577.
(2004). Magnetic fields in the human hippocampal area evoked by somatosensory oddball task. Hippocampus, 14, 426–433.
(2002). Dopamine modulates involuntary shifting and reorienting: An electromagnetic study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1894–1902.
(2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340.
(1996). Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature, 383, 256–258.
(2007). Cognitive after-effects of vibration and noise exposure and the role of noise sensitivity. Journal of Occupational Health, 49, 111–116.
(2010). Psychological effects of combined noise and whole-body vibration: A review and avenues for future research. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 224, 1289–1302.
(
in press ). The impact of intonation and valence on objective and subjective attention capture by auditory alarms. Human Factors. doi: 10.1177/0018720812438613(
in press ). The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: Comparing the roles of event and temporal information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.(2007). Temporal grouping affects the automatic processing of deviant sounds. Biological Psychology, 74, 358–364.
(2005). Deviance repetition effects as a function of stimulus feature, feature value variation, and timing: A mismatch negativity study. Biological Psychology, 68, 1–14.
(1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201–288.
(2008). Event-related delta and theta responses by tactile stimuli. Journal of Neurological Sciences, 25, 117–127.
(2008). Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Cognition, 109, 345–362.
(2010). The involuntary capture of attention by sound: Novelty and post-novelty distraction in young and older adults. Experimental Psychology, 57, 68–76.
(2008). The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition, 106, 408–432.
(2011). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119, 374–380.
(2010). The involuntary capture of attention by sound: Novelty is necessary but not sufficient for novelty distraction. Cognition, 115, 504–511.
(2011). A behavioral study of distraction by vibro-tactile novelty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1134–1139.
(2010). The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: A study of voice-location integration in auditory sensory memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 279–284.
(2011). Distraction by auditory novelty: The course and aftermath of novelty and semantic effects. Experimental Psychology, 58, 92–101.
(1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219–235.
(2005). Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 451–456.
(2003). Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 347–357.
(1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 606–621.
(2007). Assessing the automaticity of the exogenous orienting of tactile attention. Perception, 36, 1497–1505.
(1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 527–539.
(1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245–257.
(2005). The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 91, 490–501.
(2007). Processing of abstract rule violations in audition. PLoS ONE, 2, e1131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001131
(1998a). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 3355–3358.
(1998b). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71–87.
(2005). Auditory organization of sound sequences by a temporal or numerical regularity – a mismatch study comparing musicians and nonmusicians. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 270–276.
(2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 147–163.
(1997). Temporal window of integration revealed by MMN to sound omission. NeuroReport, 8, 1971–1974.
(1991a). Age effects on the P300 to novel somatosensory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 297–301.
(1991b). P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 50–55.
(2007). Spatiotemporal integration of tactile information in human somatosensory cortex. BMN Neuroscience, 8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-21.
