skip to main content
10.3115/1072133.1072219dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The SYNDIKATE text knowledge base generator

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 March 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

SYNDIKATE comprises a family of text understanding systems for automatically acquiring knowledge from real-world texts, viz. information technology test reports and medical finding reports. Their content is transformed to formal representation structures which constitute corresponding text knowledge bases. SYNDIKATE's architecture integrates requirements from the analysis of single sentences, as well as those of referentially linked sentences forming cohesive texts. Besides centering-based discourse analysis mechanisms for pronominal, nominal and bridging anaphora, SYNDIKATE is supplied with a learning module for automatically bootstrapping its domain knowledge as text analysis proceeds.

References

  1. Jim Cowie and Wendy Lehnert. Information extraction. Communications of the ACM, 39(1):80--91, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Carol Friedman and George Hripcsak. Evaluating natural language processors in the clinical domain. Methods of Information in Medicine, 37(4/5):334--344, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fernando Gomez and Carlos Segami. The recognition and classification of concepts in understanding scientific texts. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 1(1):51--77, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barbara J. Grosz, Aravind K. Joshi, and Scott Weinstein. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203--225, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Udo Hahn, Norbert Bröker, and Peter Neuhaus. Let's PARSETALK: Message-passing protocols for object-oriented parsing. In H. Bunt and A. Nijholt, editors, Advances in Probabilistic and other Parsing Technologies, pages 177--201. Kluwer, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Udo Hahn, Katja Markert, and Michael Strube. A conceptual reasoning approach to textual ellipsis. In Proceedings of the ECAI'96, pages 572--576, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Udo Hahn and Ulrich Reimer. Knowledge-based text summarization: Salience and generalization operators for knowledge base abstraction. In I. Mani and M. Maybury, editors, Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, pages 215--232. MIT Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Udo Hahn and Martin Romacker. Content management in the SYNDIKATE system: How technical documents are automatically transformed to text knowledge bases. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 35(2):137--159, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Udo Hahn, Martin Romacker, and Stefan Schulz. Discourse structures in medical reports - watch out! The generation of referentially coherent and valid text knowledge bases in the MEDSYNDIKATE system. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 53(1):1--28, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Udo Hahn, Martin Romacker, and Stefan Schulz. How knowledge drives understanding: Matching medical ontologies with the needs of medical language processing. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 15(1):25--51, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Udo Hahn, Susanne Schacht, and Norbert Bröker. Concurrent, object-oriented natural language parsing: The PARSETALK model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(1/2):179--222, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Udo Hahn and Klemens Schnattinger. Towards text knowledge engineering. In Proceedings of the AAAI'98, pages 524--531, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Udo Hahn, Stefan Schulz, and Martin Romacker. Partonomic reasoning as taxonomic reasoning in medicine. In Proceedings of the AAAI'99, pages 271--276, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Udo Hahn and Michael Strube. Centering in-the-large: Computing referential discourse segments. In Proceedings of the ACL'97/EACL'97, pages 104--111, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jerry R. Hobbs, Mark E. Stickel, Douglas E. Appelt, and Paul Martin. Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence, 63(1/2):69--142, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Katja Markert and Udo Hahn. On the interaction of metonymies and anaphora. In Proceedings of the IJCAI'97, pages 1010--1015, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Martha S. Palmer, Rebecca J. Passonneau, Carl Weir, and Tim Finin. The KERNEL text understanding system. Artificial Intelligence, 63(1/2):17--68, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lisa F. Rau, Paul S. Jacobs, and Uri Zernik. Information extraction and text summarization using linguistic knowledge acquisition. Information Processing & Management, 25(4):419--428, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Martin Romacker and Udo Hahn. An empirical assessment of semantic interpretation. In Proceedings of the NAACL 2000, pages 327--334, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Martin Romacker, Katja Markert, and Udo Hahn. Lean semantic interpretation. In Proceedings of the IJCAI'99, pages 868--875, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Stefan Schulz and Udo Hahn. Knowledge engineering by large-scale knowledge reuse: Experience from the medical domain. In Proceedings of KR 2000, pages 601--610, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Stefan Schulz, Udo Hahn, and Martin Romacker. Modeling anatomical spatial relations with description logics. In Proceedings of the AMIA 2000, pages 779--783, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Stephen Soderland and Wendy Lehnert. Wrap-up: A trainable discourse module for information extraction. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2:131--158, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Steffen Staab and Udo Hahn. Comparatives in context. In Proceedings of the AAAI'97, pages 616--621, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Steffen Staab and Udo Hahn. "Tall", "good", "high" -- compared to what? In Proceedings of the IJCAI'97, pages 996--1001, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Steffen Staab and Udo Hahn. Scalable temporal reasoning. In Proceedings of the IJCAI'99, pages 1247--1252, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Michael Strube and Udo Hahn. Functional centering: Grounding referential coherence in information structure. Computational Linguistics, 25(3):309--344, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. William A. Woods and James G. Schmolze. The KL-ONE family. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 23(2/5):133--177, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. P. Zweigenbaum, J. Bouaud, B. Bachimont, J. Charlet, and J.-F. Boisvieux. Evaluating a normalized conceptual representation produced from natural language patient discharge summaries. In Proceedings of the AMIA'97, pages 590--594.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    HLT '01: Proceedings of the first international conference on Human language technology research
    March 2001
    375 pages

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 March 2001

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate240of768submissions,31%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader