skip to main content
10.3115/1072064.1072087dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmucConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

University of Massachusetts: MUC-4 test results and analysis

Published:16 June 1992Publication History

ABSTRACT

The UMass/MUC-4 system is based on a form of sentence analysis known as selective concept extraction. This approach to language processing is distinguished by a minimal reliance on syntactic sentence analysis, along with a minimal dictionary customized to operate in a limited domain. Last year, the UMass/MUC-3 system demonstrated the viability of selective concept extraction, but serious questions were raised about the portability and scalability of the technology, particularly with respect to the creation of domain-dependent and task-dependent dictionaries. We estimated that 9 person/months went into the creation of the dictionary used by UMass/MUC-3, and we were unable to say how much domain-dependent lexicon was still missing. We were nevertheless sure that our dictionary coverage was incomplete.

References

  1. Cardie, C. (1992a) "Corpus-Based Acquisition of Relative Pronoun Disambiguation Heuristics" to appear in Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Association of Computational Linguisitcs. University of Delaware, Newark DE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cardie, C. (1992b) "Learning to Disambiguate Relative Pronouns" to appear in Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Jose, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardie, C. (1992c) "Using Cognitive Biases to Guide Feature Set Selection" to appear in Proceedings, Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, University of Indiana, Bloomington, IA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisher, D. and Riloff, E. (1992) "Applying Statistical Methods to Small Corpora: Benefiting from a Limited Domain" to appear in Probabilistic Approaches to Natural Language, a AAAI Fall Symposium. Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Riloff, E. and Lehnert, W. (1992) "Classifying Texts Using Relevancy Signatures" to appear in Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Jose, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    MUC4 '92: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Message understanding
    June 1992
    403 pages
    ISBN:1558602739

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 16 June 1992

    Qualifiers

    • Article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader