David Beard
ABSTRACT
Scheduling group meetings requires access to participants' calendars, typically located in scattered pockets or desks. Placing participants' calendars on-line and using a rule-based scheduler to find a time slot would alleviate the problem to some extent, but it often is difficult to trust the results, because correct scheduling rules are elusive, varying with the participants and the agenda of a particular meeting. What's needed is a comprehensive scheduling system that summarizes the available information for quick, flexible, and reliable scheduling. We have developed a prototype of a priority-based, graphical scheduling system called Visual Scheduler (VS).
A controlled experiment comparing automatic scheduling with VS to manual scheduling demonstrated the former to be faster and less error prone. A field study conducted over six weeks at the UNC-CH Computer Science Department showed VS to be a generally useful system and provided valuable feedback on ways to enhance the functionality of the system to increase its value as a groupwork tool. In particular, users found priority-based time-slots and access to scheduling decision reasoning advantageous. VS has been in use by more than 75 faculty, staff, and graduate students since Fall 1987.
- Cimr83.Cimral, J.J., "Integrating coordination support into automated information systems," Master's thesis, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts institute of Technology, Cambridge, May 1983.Google Scholar
- Ehlr87.Ehlrich S.F., "Strategies for Encouraging Successful Adoption of Office Communication Research,"ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 4, Oct. 1987, 340-357. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gian89.Gianatasio, D., Utility finds free times, places for meetings, Digital Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, Jan. 9, 1989, 26 (1).Google Scholar
- Gold80.Goldberg, A., "Smalltalk - 80: The Interactive Programming Environment," Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1980. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grud88.Grudin J., "Why groupware applications fail: problems in design and evaluation," CSCW 88 Proceedings, Portland, OR, Sep. 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonk67.The Jonker Information Systems Manual, Jonker Corporation, Gaithersburg, MD, 1967.Google Scholar
- Kell82.Kelly, J.F. and Chapanis, A., "How Professional Personnel Keep Their Calendars: Implications for Computerization," Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1982, 55, 241-256.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kinc85.Kincade, C.M., Dupont, P.B., and Kaye, A.R., "Electronic Calendars in the Office: An Assessment of User Needs and Current Technology," A CM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan. 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lehn87.Lehner, P.E. and Zirk, D.A., "Cognitive Factors in User/Expert-System Interaction," Human Factors, 1987, 29(1), 97-109. Google ScholarDigital Library
- MacK76.MacKenzie, R.A., Time-Trap: How to get more done in less time, MacGraw- Hill, 1976.Google Scholar
- Malo83.Malone, T.W., "How People use Office Systems," ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, Jan. 1983, 99-112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malo87.Malone, T.W., Grant, K.R., Lai, K.Y., Rao, R., Rosenblitt, D., "Semi Structured Messages are Surprisingly Useful for Computer-Supported Coordination," A CM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 2, Apr. 1987, 115-131. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sari85.Sarin, S., and Greif, I., "Computer-based real-time conferences," IEEE Computer, Vol. 18, No. 10, Oct. 1985, 33-45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thom88.Thompson, K.M., WordPerfect Office desktop organizer includes e-mail, group scheduling, PC Magazine, Vol.7, No. 21, Dec 13, 1988, 38 (1).Google Scholar
- Utti90.Utting, K., "Data Dock: A New Style of Computing," IRIS TR90-2, 1990.Google Scholar
- Wine62.Wirier, B.J., Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, MacGraw-Hill, 2nd Edition, 1962.Google Scholar
- Zade65.Zadeh, L. A., "Fuzzy Sets," Information Control, Vol. 8, 1965, 338-353.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zade73.Zadeh, L. A., "Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision-Making Approach," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SME-3, No.l, Jan. 1973, 28-45.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A visual calendar for scheduling group meetings
Recommendations
Group-Based Pfair Scheduling
We consider the problem of supertasking in Pfair-scheduled multiprocessor systems. In this approach, a set of tasks, called component tasks , is assigned to a server task, called a supertask , which is then scheduled as an ordinary Pfair task. ...
Single machine group scheduling under decreasing linear deterioration
This paper considers single machine scheduling problems with group technology (GT) and deteriorating jobs. A sequence independent setup is required to process a job from a different group and jobs in each group are processed together. We consider the ...
Single-machine group scheduling problems with deterioration consideration
In many realistic situations, a job processed later consumes more time than the same job when it is processed earlier; this phenomenon is known as deteriorating jobs. However, job deterioration is relatively unexplored in the context of group ...
Comments