Desney S. Tan
Mary Czerwinski
George Robertson
ABSTRACT
Previous research reported interesting gender effects involving specific benefits for females navigating with wider fields of view on large displays. However, it was not clear what was driving the 3D navigation performance gains, and whether or not the effect was more tightly coupled to gender or to spatial abilities. The study we report in this paper replicates and extends previous work, demonstrating that the gender-specific navigation benefits come from the presence of optical flow cues, which are better afforded by wider fields of view on large displays. The study also indicates that the effect may indeed be tied to gender, as opposed to spatial abilities. Together, the findings provide a significant contribution to the HCI community, as we provide strong recommendations for the design and presentation of 3D environments, backed by empirical data. Additionally, these recommendations reliably benefit females, without an accompanying detriment to male navigation performance.
- Alfano, P.L., Michel, G.F. (1990). Restricting the field of view: Perceptual and performance effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70(1), 35--45.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Alice 3D Authoring Tool, see http://www.alice.org/.Google Scholar
- Atchley, P., Andersen, G.J. (1999). The discrimination of heading from optic flow is not retinally invariant. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(3), 387--396.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bederson, B., Boltman, A. (1999). Does animation help users build mental maps of spatial information? IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 28--35. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Conroy, R.A. (2001). Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments. Department of Architecture. London, University College London: 249.Google Scholar
- Crook, T.H., Youngjohn, J.R., & Larrabee, G.J. (1993) The influence of age, gender, and cues on computer-simulated topographic memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 9(1), 41--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Crowell, J.A., Banks, M.S. (1993). Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(3), 325--337.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cutmore, T.R.H., Hine, T.J., Maberly, K.J., Langford, N.M., & Hawgood, G. (2000). Cognitive and gender factors influencing navigation in a virtual environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 223--249. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cutting, J.E., Springer, K., Braren, P.A., & Johnson, S.H. (1992). Wayfinding on foot from information in retinal, not optical, flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(1), 41--72.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Czerwinski, M., Tan, D.S., Robertson, G.G. (2002). Women take a wider view. Proceedings of CHI 2002, ACM Press, 195--202. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Darken, R.P., Sibert, J.L. (1996). Navigating in large virtual worlds. The International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 8(1), 49--72. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Devlin, A.S., Bernstein, J. (1995). Interactive wayfinding: Use of cues by men and women. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 23--38.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Duffy, C.J. (2000). Optic flow analysis for self-movement perception. International Review of Neurobiology, 44, 199--218.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eckstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H, & Derman, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J.J. (1966). The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems. Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Halpern, D.F. (2000). Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities, 3rd Edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc: New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Hunt, E., Waller, D. (1999). Orientation and wayfinding: A review. ONR Technical Report N00014-96-0380.Google Scholar
- Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and Cognition. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. 1--66.Google Scholar
- Kirschen M.P., Kahana M.J., Sekuler R., & Burack, B. (2000). Optic flow helps humans learn to navigate through synthetic environments. Perception, 29, 801--818.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Klatzky, R.L., Loomis, J.M., Beall, A.C., Chance, S.S., & Golledge, R.G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9(4), 293--298.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lawton, C.A., Charleston, S.I., & Zieles, A.S. (1996). Individual and gender-related differences in indoor wayfinding. Environment and Behavior, 28(2), 204--219.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G., & Philbeck, J.W. (1999). Human navigation by path integration. In Golledge, R.G. (Ed.), Wayfinding: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Johns Hopkins: Baltimore. 125--151.Google Scholar
- Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., McNamara, T.P., Shelton, A.L., & Carr, W. (1998). Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are viewpoint dependent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 215--226.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Passini, R. (1984). Spatial representations, a wayfinding perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 153--164.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Patrick, E., Cosgrove, D., Slavkovic, A., Rode, J.A., Verratti, T., & Chiselko, G. (2000). Using a large projection screen as an alternative to head-mounted displays for virtual environments. Proceedings of CHI 2000, ACM Press, 478--485. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Prestopnik, J.L., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2000). The relations among wayfinding strategy use, sense of direction, sex, familiarity, and wayfinding ability. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 177--191.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richardson, A.E., Montello, D.R., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps, and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition, 27(4), 741--750.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richman, J.B., Dyre, B.P. (1999) Peripheral visual stimulation benefits heading perception during active control. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1411.Google Scholar
- Richman, J.B., Stanfield, J., & Dyre, B.P. (1998). Small fields of view interfere with heading during active control but not passive viewing. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1545--1549.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sholl, J.M., Bartels, G.P. (2002). The role of self to object updating in orientation free performance on spatial-memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 422--436.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tan, D.S., Robertson, G.G, & Czerwinski, M. (2001). Exploring 3D navigation: Combining speed-coupled flying with orbiting. Proceedings of CHI 2001, ACM Press, 418--425. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thorndyke, P., Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560--589.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M.P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250--170.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Warren, W.H., Hannon, D.J. (1988). Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow. Nature, 336(10), 162--163.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Warren, W.H., Kurtz, K.J. (1992). The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(5), 443--454.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Warren, W.H., Morris, M.W., Kalish, M. (1988). Perception of translational heading from optical flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 14(4), 646--660.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Women go with the (optical) flow
Recommendations
Women take a wider view
CHI '02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsPublished reports suggest that males significantly outperform females in navigating virtual environments. A novel navigation technique reported in CHI 2001, when combined with a large display and wide field of view, appeared to reduce that gender bias. ...
Computers work for women: Gender differences in e-supported divorce mediation
Despite the increasing use of e-mediated services to settle divorce, research on its effectiveness is limited. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of an asynchronous e-supported tool to mediate divorces in the Netherlands. In order to do so, ...
Intersections of gender and sexual minority status
The present study refined existing bullying literature by examining differences in risk of three types of bullying victimization (offline only, cyberbullying only, and co-occurring victimization) for four different gender-sexual minority status groups ...
Comments