J. Callahan
B. Shneiderman
ABSTRACT
Menus are largely formatted in a linear fashion listing items from the top to bottom of the screen or window. Pull down menus are a common example of this format. Bitmapped computer displays, however, allow greater freedom in the placement, font, and general presentation of menus. A pie menu is a format where the items are placed along the circumference of a circle at equal radial distances from the center. Pie menus gain over traditional linear menus by reducing target seek time, lowering error rates by fixing the distance factor and increasing the target size in Fitts's Law, minimizing the drift distance after target selection, and are, in general, subjectively equivalent to the linear style.
- 1.Adobe Systems Inc. Postscript Reference .Manual, Palo Alto, Calif., 1985.Google Scholar
- 2.Card, S.K. User perceptual mechanisms: in the search of computer command menus, In Proceedings . Human Factors in Compuler Systems 1982 (Gaithersburg, Md., Mar. 15-17). ACM, New York, 1982, pp. 190-196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., and Newell, A. The Psychology of Human-Computer {nleraction, Lawrence Erlbaum, London, 1983. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.Dray, S.M., Ogden, W.G., and Vestewig, R.E. man computer interface Proceedings of the Human Factors Society: 25th Annual Meeting 1981 (Rochester, N.Y., Oct. 12-16). Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 1981, pp. 746-748.Google Scholar
- 5.Ge~tys, J. and Newman, R., X Windows. MIT, 1985.Google Scholar
- 6.Gosling, J. Ne WS: A Definitive Approach to Window Systems Sun Microsystems Corp., Mountain View, Calif., 1986.Google Scholar
- 7.Hopkins, D., Callahan, J., and Weiser, M. Pies: Implementation, Evaluation and Application of Circular Menus. University of Maryland Computer Science Department Technical Report, 1988.Google Scholar
- 8.Kirk, R. t'Txperimen~al Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Brooks-Cole, Belmont, Calif., 1968.Google Scholar
- 9.McDonald, J.E., Stone, J.D., and Liebelt, L.S. Searching fi)r items in menus: The effects of organization and type of target. Proceeding of the Human Factors Society: ~7th Annual Meeting 1983 (Norfolk, Virginia, Oct. 10-14). Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 1983, pp. 834-837.Google Scholar
- 10.Perlman, G. Making the right choices with menus. INTERACT '84, First IFIP International Conference on Human Computer interaction. NorthtIolland, Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 291-295.Google Scholar
- 11.Shneiderman, B. Designing ~he User Interface, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Xerox Corporation, Interpress Electronic Printing Standard. Stamford, Conn., 1984.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- An empirical comparison of pie vs. linear menus
Recommendations
Design issues related to pie menus for 5-way joysticks
Mobility '07: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on mobile technology, applications, and systems and the 1st international symposium on Computer human interaction in mobile technologyAlthough linear textual menus are a widely adopted solution in the mobile phone user interfaces, alternatives that would take smaller amount of screen real estate exist, e.g. toolbars and pie menus. Pie menus also provide access to functions with fewer ...
Stacked Half-Pie menus: navigating nested menus on interactive tabletops
ITS '09: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and SurfacesHierarchical menus can be found in many of today's software applications. However, these menus are often optimized for mouse or keyboard interaction and their suitability for touch screen-based interactive tabletops is questionable. On touch based ...
Extended Pie Menus for Immersive Virtual Environments
Pie menus are a well-known technique for interacting with 2D environments and so far a large body of research documents their usage and optimizations. Yet, comparatively little research has been done on the usability of pie menus in immersive virtual ...
Comments