skip to main content
10.1145/503376.503408acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Introducing instant messaging and chat in the workplace

Published:20 April 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

We report on our experiences of introducing an instant messaging and group chat application into geographically distributed workgroups. We describe a number of issues we encountered, including privacy concerns, individual versus group training, and focusing on teams or individuals. The perception of the tool's utility was a complex issue, depending both on users' views of the importance of informal communication, and their perceptions of the nature of cross-site communication issues. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of critical mass, which is related to the features each user actually uses. More generally, we encountered a dilemma that imposes serious challenges for user-centered design of groupware systems

References

  1. Bradner, E., Kellogg, W., & Erickson, T. (1999). The adoption and use of BABBLE: A field study of chat in the workplace. In ECSCW (pp. 139--157). Lyngby, Denmark: Center for Tele-Information. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Churchill, E. F. and S. Bly. It's all in the words: Supporting work activities with lightweight tools. In GROUP '99. 1999. Phoenix, AZ 40--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Grudin, J. "Groupware and Cooperative Work: Problems and Prospects." In R.M. Baecker (ed.), Readings in Groupware and CSCW, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman, pp. 97--105, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Grinter, R. E. and M. Eldridge (2001) "y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg?" In ECSCW Bonn, Germany: September 18-20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Herbsleb, J. D. and R. E. Grinter. Splitting the Organization and Integrating the Code: Conway's Law Revisited. In International Conference on Software Engineering. Los Angeles, CA. 85--95, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Herbsleb, J.D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T.A., & Grinter, R.E. An Empirical Study of Global Software Development: Distance and Speed. In International Conference on Software Engineering. Toronto, Canada, May 15-18,2001, pp. 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Herbsleb, J.D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T.A., & Grinter, R.E. Distance, Dependencies, and Delay in a Global Collaboration. CSCW 2000 pp. 319--328, Philadelphia, PA, Dec. 2-7, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jones, E.E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychologist, 34, 107--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). "The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior." In E. E. Jones et al (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown: General Learning Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kraut, R.E., Fish, R.S., Root, R.W., & Chalfonte, B.L. (1990). Informal communication in organizations: Form, function and technology. In S. Oskamp & S. Spacapan, (Eds.), Human reactions to technology: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 145--199). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mark, Gloria, Poltrock, Steven. Diffusion of a Collaborative Technology Across Distance. To appear, Group 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Markus, M. (1990). Toward a "critical mass" theory of interactive media. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 194--218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., Bradner, E. Interaction and Outeraction: Instant Messaging in Action. In CSCW 2000, 79--88, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rogers, Everett M., Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tang, J., N. Yankelovich, J. Begole, et. al. ConNexus to Awarenex: Extending Awareness to mobile Users. In CHI 2001. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Whittaker, S., Frohlich, D., & Daly-Jones, O. (1994). Informal workplace communication: What is it like and how might we support it? CHI '94 (pp. 131--137). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Introducing instant messaging and chat in the workplace

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2002
            478 pages
            ISBN:1581134533
            DOI:10.1145/503376
            • Conference Chair:
            • Dennis Wixon

            Copyright © 2002 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 April 2002

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '02 Paper Acceptance Rate61of414submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader