skip to main content
10.1145/358916.358980acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Conversation trees and threaded chats

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 December 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

Chat programs and instant messaging services are increasingly popular among Internet users. However, basic issues with the interfaces and data structures of most forms of chat limit their utility for use in formal interactions (like group meetings) and decision-making tasks. In this paper, we discuss Threaded Text Chat, a program designed to address some of the deficiencies of current chat programs. Standard forms of chat introduce ambiguity into interaction in a number of ways, most profoundly by rupturing connections between turns and replies. Threaded Chat presents a solution to this problem by supporting the basic turn-taking structure of human conversation. While the solution introduces interface design challenges of its own, usability studies show that users' patterns of interaction in Threaded Chat are equally effective, but different (and possibly more efficient) than standard chat programs.

References

  1. 1.ActiveWorlds,http://www.activeworlds.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Derfler,F.Instant Messaging:Chat Goes to Work.PC Magazine.19(2),January 18,2000,82-101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Donath,J.,Karahalios,K.,Viegas,F.Visualizing Conversation.Proceedings of HICSS-32 ,Maui,HI, January 5-8,1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Erickson,T.,Smith,D.,Kellogg,W.,Laff,M., Richards,J.,and Bradner,E.Socially translucent systems:Social proxies,persistent conversation,and the design of babble.Proceedings of the 1999 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI 99). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Everquest,http://www.everquest.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Farnham,S.D.,Chesley,H.McGhee,D.,Kawal,R. Structured On-line Interactions:Improving the Decision-making of Small Discussion Groups.In Proceedings of CSCW 2000,Philadelphia,December 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Garcia,A.,and Jacobs,J.The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the Turn Taking System in Quasi- Synchronous Computer Mediated Communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction,Vol.32, No.4,1999,337-367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. 8.Garcia,A.,and Jacobs,J.The Interactional Organization of Computer Mediated Communication in the College Classroom.Qualitative Sociology ,Vol.21, No.3,1998,299-317Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Herring,S.Interactional Coherence in CMC.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication ,Thomas Erickson (ed.),Vol.4,No.4,June 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Hill,W.,and Hollan,J.History Enriched Data Objects: Prototypes and Policy Issues,The Information Society , Volume 10,pp.139-145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.John,B.,and Kieras,D.The GOMS family of analysis techniques:comparison and contrast.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction ,3,4 (December 1996),pp.320 - 351. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Kobielus,J.Instant Messaging.The Burton Group Network Strategy Report,1.October 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Kollock,P.,Smith,M.Managing the Virtual Commons:Cooperation and Conflict in Computer Communities.Computer-Mediated Communication ,S. Herring (ed.).Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Microsoft V-Chat,http://www.microsoft.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Pomerantz,A.Agreeing and Disagreeing with assessments:some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.In John Heritage and J.Maxwell Atkinson (eds.),Structures of Social Action:Studies in Conversation Analysis.Cambridge.1984.57-101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Reid,E.Electronic Chat:Social Issues on Internet Relay Chat.Media Information Australia ,67,1993,62- 79Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. 17.Rintel,S.,Pittam,J.,Strangers in a Strange Land: Interaction Management on Internet Relay Chat,Human Communication Research.Vol.23,No.4,1997,507- 534Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. 18.Sacks,H.,Schegloff,E.,and Jefferson,G.A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.Language ,50(4).1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.The Palace,http://www.thepalace.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Viegas,F.and Donath,J.Chat Circles.Proceedings of the 1999 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI 99). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Vronay,D.,Smith,M.,and Drucker,S.Alternative Interfaces for Chat.Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 99). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.Wiemann,J.,and Knapp,M.Turn-Taking in Conversations,Journal of Communication ,25,1975, 75-92Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. 23.WorldsAway,http://www.worldsaway.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Conversation trees and threaded chats

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CSCW '00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
            December 2000
            346 pages
            ISBN:1581132220
            DOI:10.1145/358916

            Copyright © 2000 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 December 2000

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            CSCW '00 Paper Acceptance Rate36of199submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

            Upcoming Conference

            CSCW '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader