skip to main content
10.1145/354401.354408acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Multimodal system processing in mobile environments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 November 2000Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.Clow, J. & Oviatt, S. L. STAMP: A suite of tools for analyzing multimodal system processing, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Sydney: ASSTA Inc., 1998, 2, pp. 277-280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Cohen, P. R., Cheyer, A., Wang, M., & Baeg, S. C. An open agent architecture. AAAI '94 Spring Symposium Series on Software Agents, Menlo Park: AAAI press, 1994, pp. 1-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Cohen, P., Johnston, M., McGee, D., Oviatt, S., Pittman, J., Smith, I., Chen, L. & Clow, J. Quickset: Multimodal interaction for distributed applications. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Multimedia Conference, New York, NY: ACM Press, 1997, pp. 31-4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Das, S., Bakis, R., Nadas, A., Nahamoo, D. & Picheny, M. Influence of background noise and microphone on the performance of the IBM TANGORA speech recognition system, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustic Speech Signal Processing, 1993, 2, pp. 71-74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.Dreher, J.J. & O'Neill, J.J. Effects of ambient noise on speaker intelligibility for words and phrases, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1957, 29 (12), pp. 1320-1323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6.Gong, Y. Speech recognition in noisy environments, Speech Communication, 1995, 16, pp. 261-291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Hanley, T.D.& Steer, M.D. Effect of level of distracting noise upon speaking rate, duration and intensity, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1949, 14, pp. 363-368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. 8.Iverson, P., Bernstein, L., & Auer, E. Modeling the interaction of phonemic intelligibility and lexical structure in audiovisual word recognition, Speech Communication, 1998, 26 (1-2), pp. 45-63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Johnston, M., Cohen, P.R., McGee, D., Oviatt, S.L., Pittman, J.A. & Smith, I. Unification-based multimodal integration. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, San Francisco, CA.: Morgan Kaufmann, 1997, pp. 281-288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Junqua, J.C. The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners & automatic speech recognizers, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1993, 93 (1), pp.510-24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11.Kumar, S., Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J. The adaptive agent architecture: achieving fault-tolerance using persistent broker teams. To appear in The Fourth International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 2000), Boston, MA, USA, July 7-12, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Lockwood, P. & Boudy, J. Experiments with a non-linear spectral subtractor (NSS), hidden markov models and the projection for robust speech recognition in cars, Speech Communication, 1992,11(2-3), pp. 215-28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Lombard, E. Le signe de l'elevation de la voix, Annals Maladiers Oreille, Larynx, Nez, Pharynx, 1911, 37, pp. 101-119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Oviatt, S. L. Ten myths of multimodal interaction, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42, No. 11, November, 1999, pp. 74-81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Oviatt, S. L. Mutual disambiguation of recognition errors in a multimodal architecture. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'99), ACM Press: New York, N.Y., 1999, pp. 576-583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Pick, H.L., Siegel, G.M., Fox, P.W., Garber, S.R. & Kearney, J.K. Inhibiting the Lombard effect, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989, 85 (2), pp. 894-900.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. 17.Potash, L.M. A signal detection problem and a possible solution in Japanese quail, Animal Behavior, 1972, 20, pp. 192-195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. 18.Schulman, R. Articulatory dynamics of loud and normal speech, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989, 85, pp. 295-312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. 19.Siegel, G.M., Pick, H.L., Olsen, M.G. & Sawin, L. Auditory feedback in the regulation of vocal intensity of preschool children, Developmental Psychology, 1976, 12, pp. 255-261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20.Sinott, J.M., Stebbins, W.C. & Moody,D.B. Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975, 58, pp. 412-14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. 21.Van Summers, W.V., Pisoni, D.B., Bernacki, R.H., Pedlow, R.I. and Stokes, M.A. Effects of noise on speech production: Acoustic and perceptual analyses, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1988, 84, pp. 917-928.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Multimodal system processing in mobile environments

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            UIST '00: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
            November 2000
            248 pages
            ISBN:1581132123
            DOI:10.1145/354401

            Copyright © 2000 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 November 2000

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

            Upcoming Conference

            UIST '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader