Shirley de Wit
Felienne Hermans
ABSTRACT
Motivation Only 27% of computer and mathematical scientists in the United States and 18% of IT specialists in Europe are women. The under-representation of women in the field of Computer Science is, among other things, influenced by stereotypes of computer scientists. These stereotypes include being male, asocial and having an (obsessive) interest in computers. Even though stereotypical beliefs can develop at an early age, research on children’s stereotypes of computer scientists is sparse and inconclusive.
Objectives Stereotypes we hold can be implicit or unconscious beliefs, or explicit or conscious beliefs. In this study, we focus on children’s implicit and explicit stereotypes regarding computer scientists’ gender, social skills and interests. We also study whether explaining what a computer scientist does affects these stereotypes.
Method We study the implicit stereotypes through the reduced-length Child Implicit Association Test and the explicit stereotypes through self-reported absolute and relative Likert scale questions. We gathered data on 564 children between the age of 7 and 18 who were visiting a science museum. The participants in the experiment group (n=352) watch a video of either a man or woman explaining what a computer scientist does at the start of the study.
Results We found weak implicit stereotypical beliefs on computer scientists’ social skills and moderate implicit stereotypical beliefs on computer scientists’ interests. We also found explicit stereotypes on computer scientists’ gender, social skills and interests. Measuring the effects of the intervention, we found significant differences between the control and experiment group in their explicit stereotypes on computer scientists’ social skills.
Discussion The amount of scientific work on children’s stereotypes regarding computer scientists is still limited. Applying the reduced-length Child Implicit Association Test to measure children’s stereotypes on computer scientists has, to our knowledge, not been done before. Understanding children’s stereotypes and how to tackle them contributes to closing the gender gap in Computer Science.
- Efthimia Aivaloglou and Felienne Hermans. 2019. Early programming education and career orientation: the effects of gender, self-efficacy, motivation and stereotypes. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 679–685.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hart Blanton, James Jaccard, and Christopher N Burrows. 2015. Implications of the implicit association test D-transformation for psychological assessment. Assessment 22, 4 (2015), 429–440.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennie S Brotman and Felicia M Moore. 2008. Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 45, 9 (2008), 971–1002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sapna Cheryan, Benjamin J Drury, and Marissa Vichayapai. 2013. Enduring influence of stereotypical computer science role models on women’s academic aspirations. Psychology of Women Quarterly 37, 1 (2013), 72–79.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sapna Cheryan, Allison Master, and Andrew N Meltzoff. 2015. Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in psychology 6 (2015), 49.Google Scholar
- Sapna Cheryan, Victoria C Plaut, Caitlin Handron, and Lauren Hudson. 2013. The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex roles 69, 1 (2013), 58–71.Google Scholar
- Sapna Cheryan, John Oliver Siy, Marissa Vichayapai, Benjamin J Drury, and Saenam Kim. 2011. Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?Social psychological and personality science 2, 6 (2011), 656–664.Google Scholar
- Jacob Cohen. 1992. A power primer.Psychological bulletin 112, 1 (1992), 155.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2020. Women in digital scoreboard 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/women-digital-scoreboard-2020. Accessed: March 2021.Google Scholar
- IAT Corp. [n.d.]. Implicit Association Test FAQ. https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/canada/background/faqs.html. Accessed: March 2021.Google Scholar
- Shelley J Correll. 2001. Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American journal of Sociology 106, 6 (2001), 1691–1730.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dario Cvencek, Andrew N Meltzoff, and Anthony G Greenwald. 2011. Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child development 82, 3 (2011), 766–779.Google Scholar
- Jill Denner, Shannon Campe, and Linda Werner. 2019. Does computer game design and programming benefit children? A meta-synthesis of research. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 19, 3 (2019), 1–35.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yarrow Dunham, Andrew Scott Baron, and Mahzarin R Banaji. 2006. From American city to Japanese village: A cross-cultural investigation of implicit race attitudes. Child development 77, 5 (2006), 1268–1281.Google Scholar
- Agnes Elling and Annelies Knoppers. 2005. Sport, gender and ethnicity: Practises of symbolic inclusion/exclusion. Journal of youth and adolescence 34, 3 (2005), 257–268.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nathan Ensmenger. 2015. “Beards, sandals, and other signs of rugged individualism”: masculine culture within the computing professions. Osiris 30, 1 (2015), 38–65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chloë FitzGerald, Angela Martin, Delphine Berner, and Samia Hurst. 2019. Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review. BMC psychology 7, 1 (2019), 1–12.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michelle Friend. 2015. Middle school girls’ envisioned future in computing. Computer Science Education 25, 2 (2015), 152–173.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sandy Graham and Celine Latulipe. 2003. CS girls rock: sparking interest in computer science and debunking the stereotypes. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. 322–326.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anthony G Greenwald, Debbie E McGhee, and Jordan LK Schwartz. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.Journal of personality and social psychology 74, 6(1998), 1464.Google Scholar
- Anthony G Greenwald and Brian A Nosek. 2001. Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. (2001).Google Scholar
- Anthony G Greenwald, Brian A Nosek, and Mahzarin R Banaji. 2003. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.Journal of personality and social psychology 85, 2(2003), 197.Google Scholar
- Francisco J Gutierrez, Jocelyn Simmonds, Cecilia Casanova, Cecilia Sotomayor, and Nancy Hitschfeld. 2018. Coding or hacking? exploring inaccurate views on computing and computer scientists among K-6 learners in Chile. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 993–998.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexandria K Hansen, Hilary A Dwyer, Ashley Iveland, Mia Talesfore, Lacy Wright, Danielle B Harlow, and Diana Franklin. 2017. Assessing children’s understanding of the work of computer scientists: The draw-a-computer-scientist test. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education. 279–284.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilhelm Hofmann, Bertram Gawronski, Tobias Gschwendner, Huy Le, and Manfred Schmitt. 2005. A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31, 10 (2005), 1369–1385.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jung Won Hur, Carey E Andrzejewski, and Daniela Marghitu. 2017. Girls and computer science: experiences, perceptions, and career aspirations. Computer Science Education 27, 2 (2017), 100–120.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beethika Khan, Carol Robbins, and Abigail Okrent. 2020. The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2020. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20201. Accessed: March 2021.Google Scholar
- Zuzana Kubincová, Martin Homola, Ming-Hsiu Mia Chen, and Teng-Hui Lu. 2020. DRAW-A-PROGRAMMER TEST AND FIRST RESULTS IN SLOVAKIA. In Proceedings of EDULEARN20 Conference, Vol. 6. 7th.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Colleen M Lewis, Ruth E Anderson, and Ken Yasuhara. 2016. ” I Don’t Code All Day” Fitting in Computer Science When the Stereotypes Don’t Fit. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on international computing education research. 23–32.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Allison Master, Sapna Cheryan, and Andrew N Meltzoff. 2016. Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science.Journal of Educational Psychology 108, 3 (2016), 424.Google Scholar
- Allison Master, Sapna Cheryan, Adriana Moscatelli, and Andrew N Meltzoff. 2017. Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls. Journal of experimental child psychology 160 (2017), 92–106.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brian A Nosek, Mahzarin R Banaji, and Anthony G Greenwald. 2002. Math= male, me= female, therefore math ≠ me.Journal of personality and social psychology 83, 1(2002), 44.Google Scholar
- Brian A Nosek, Anthony G Greenwald, and Mahzarin R Banaji. 2005. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31, 2 (2005), 166–180.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brian A Nosek, Frederick L Smyth, Natarajan Sriram, Nicole M Lindner, Thierry Devos, Alfonso Ayala, Yoav Bar-Anan, Robin Bergh, Huajian Cai, Karen Gonsalkorale, 2009. National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 26(2009), 10593–10597.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adam Rutland, Lindsey Cameron, Alan Milne, and Peter McGeorge. 2005. Social norms and self-presentation: Children’s implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes. Child development 76, 2 (2005), 451–466.Google Scholar
- Christine K Shenouda. 2014. Effects of Gender Stereotypes on Children’s Beliefs, Interests, and Performance in STEM Fields. Michigan State University. Psychology-Doctor of Philosophy.Google Scholar
- Cary Stacy Smith and Li-Ching Hung. 2008. Stereotype threat: Effects on education. Social Psychology of Education 11, 3 (2008), 243–257.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Una Tellhed, Martin Bäckström, and Fredrik Björklund. 2017. Will I fit in and do well? The importance of social belongingness and self-efficacy for explaining gender differences in interest in STEM and HEED majors. Sex roles 77, 1 (2017), 86–96.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tina Vrieler, Aletta Nylén, and Åsa Cajander. 2020. Computer science club for girls and boys–a survey study on gender differences. Computer Science Education(2020), 1–31.Google Scholar
- Michael J White and Gwendolen B White. 2006. Implicit and explicit occupational gender stereotypes. Sex roles 55, 3 (2006), 259–266.Google Scholar
- Amanda Williams and Jennifer R Steele. 2016. The reliability of child-friendly race-attitude implicit association tests. Frontiers in psychology 7 (2016), 1576.Google Scholar
- Hila Zitelny, Michal Shalom, and Yoav Bar-Anan. 2017. What is the implicit gender-science stereotype? Exploring correlations between the gender-science IAT and self-report measures. Social Psychological and Personality Science 8, 7 (2017), 719–735.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
The Influence of Gender-Ethnic Intersectionality on Gender Stereotypes about IT Skills and Knowledge
One line of investigation in attempting to better understand the gender imbalance in the information technology (IT) field is to examine gender stereotypes about the skills and knowledge in the IT profession. A survey of 4046 university students in the ...
Gender, Social Interactions and Interests of Characters Illustrated in Scratch and Python Programming Books for Children
SIGCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1From an early age, girls may opt out of Computer Science (CS) for not fitting the CS stereotypes of being male, asocial and technology-oriented. These stereotypes might be strengthened by children's books on programming, but little is known about this. ...
Children’s Interest in a CS Career: Exploring Age, Gender, Computer Interests, Programming Experience and Stereotypes
ICER '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1Background and Context. Increasing gender diversity in the field of Computer Science (CS) benefits the economy as well as gender equality. However, several obstacles - including underdeveloped CS interests, lack of programming experience, and a misfit ...
Comments