skip to main content
10.1145/3394231.3397924acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Joint Local and Global Sequence Modeling in Temporal Correlation Networks for Trending Topic Detection

Published:06 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Trending topics represent the topics that are becoming increasingly popular and attract a sudden spike in human attention. Trending topics are critical and useful in modern search engines, which can not only enhance user engagements but also improve user search experiences. Large volumes of user search queries over time are indicative aggregated user interests and thus provide rich information for detecting trending topics. The topics derived from query logs can be naturally treated as a temporal correlation network, suggesting both local and global trending signals. The local signals represent the trending/non-trending information within each frequency sequence, and the global correlation signals denote the relationships across frequency sequences. We hypothesize that integrating local and global signals can benefit trending topic detection. In an attempt to jointly exploit the complementary information of local and global signals in temporal correlation networks, we propose a novel framework, Local-Global Ranking (LGRank), to both capture local temporal sequence representation with adversarial learning and model global sequence correlations simultaneously for trending topic detection. The experimental results on real-world datasets from a commercial search engine demonstrate the effectiveness of LGRank on detecting trending topics.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3394231.3397924.mp4

mp4

10.5 MB

References

  1. Ziad Al Bawab, George H Mills, and Jean-Francois Crespo. 2012. Finding trending local topics in search queries for personalization of a recommendation system. In KDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Carlos Hurtado, and Marcelo Mendoza. 2004. Query recommendation using query logs in search engines. In International Conference on Extending Database Technology. Springer, 588–596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Doug Beeferman and Adam Berger. 2000. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log. In KDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mikhail Belkin and Partha Niyogi. Laplacian eigenmaps and spectral techniques for embedding and clustering. In NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Giovanni Bonanno, Guido Caldarelli, Fabrizio Lillo, Salvatore Miccichè, Nicolas Vandewalle, and Rosario Nunzio Mantegna. 2004. Networks of equities in financial markets. The European Physical J. B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 38, 2(2004), 363–371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Carlos Castillo, Claudio Corsi, Debora Donato, Paolo Ferragina, and Aristides Gionis. 2008. Query-log mining for detecting spam. In Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Adversarial information retrieval on the web. ACM, 17–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yan Chen, Hadi Amiri, Zhoujun Li, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2013. Emerging topic detection for organizations from microblogs. In SIGIR. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhumin Chen, Haichun Yang, J Ma, J Lei, and H Gao. 2011. Time-based query classification and its application for page rank. J Comput Info Sys 7(2011), 3149–3156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hyunyoung Choi and Hal Varian. 2012. Predicting the present with Google Trends. Economic Record 88(2012), 2–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Junyoung Chung, Caglar Gulcehre, KyungHyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555(2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Anlei Dong, Yi Chang, Zhaohui Zheng, Gilad Mishne, Jing Bai, Ruiqiang Zhang, Karolina Buchner, Ciya Liao, and Fernando Diaz. 2010. Towards recency ranking in web search. In WSDM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Anlei Dong, Ruiqiang Zhang, Pranam Kolari, Jing Bai, Fernando Diaz, Yi Chang, Zhaohui Zheng, and Hongyuan Zha. 2010. Time is of the essence: improving recency ranking using twitter data. In WWW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. F. Donges, Y. Zou, N. Marwan, and J. Kurths. 2009. Complex networks in climate dynamics - comparing linear and nonlinear network construction methods. European Physical J. - Special Topics 174 (2009), 157–179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Nan Du, Hanjun Dai, Rakshit Trivedi, Utkarsh Upadhyay, Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez, and Le Song. 2016. Recurrent marked temporal point processes: Embedding event history to vector. In KDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nadav Golbandi Golbandi, Liran Katzir Katzir, Yehuda Koren Koren, and Ronny Lempel Lempel. 2013. Expediting search trend detection via prediction of query counts. In WSDM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Anat Hashavit, Roy Levin, Ido Guy, and Gilad Kutiel. 2016. Effective Trend Detection within a Dynamic Search Context. In SIGIR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735–1780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Shubhra Kanti Karmaker Santu, Liangda Li, Dae Hoon Park, Yi Chang, and ChengXiang Zhai. 2017. Modeling the influence of popular trending events on user search behavior. In WWW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dror Y Kenett, Yoash Shapira, Asaf Madi, Sharron Bransburg-Zabary, Gitit Gur-Gershgoren, and Eshel Ben-Jacob. 2010. Dynamics of stock market correlations. AUCO Czech Economic Review 4, 3 (2010), 330–341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980(2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Alex M Lamb, Anirudh Goyal ALIAS PARTH GOYAL, Ying Zhang, Saizheng Zhang, Aaron C Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2016. Professor forcing: A new algorithm for training recurrent networks. In NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Vasileios Lampos, Andrew C Miller, Steve Crossan, and Christian Stefansen. 2015. Advances in nowcasting influenza-like illness rates using search query logs. Scientific reports 5(2015), 12760.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Chi-Hoon Lee, HengShuai Yao, Xu He, Su Han Chan, JieYang Chang, and Farzin Maghoul. 2014. Learning to predict trending queries: classification-based. In WWW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Liangda Li, Hongbo Deng, Jianhui Chen, and Yi Chang. 2017. Learning parametric models for context-aware query auto-completion via hawkes processes. In WSDM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Josef Ludescher, Avi Gozolchiani, Mikhail I Bogachev, Armin Bunde, Shlomo Havlin, and Hans Joachim Schellnhuber. 2014. Very early warning of next El Niño. PNAS (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Catherine Lui, P Takis Metaxas, and Eni Mustafaraj. 2011. On the predictability of the US elections through search volume activity. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ping Luo, Kai Shu, Junjie Wu, Li Wan, and Yong Tan. 2020. Exploring Correlation Network for Cheating Detection. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 11, 1(2020), 1–23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Yao Ma, Suhang Wang, ZhaoChun Ren, Dawei Yin, and Jiliang Tang. 2017. Preserving Local and Global Information for Network Embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.07266(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosario N Mantegna. 1999. Hierarchical structure in financial markets. The European Physical J. B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 11, 1(1999), 193–197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jinfeng Rao, Ferhan Ture, Xing Niu, and Jimmy Lin. 2017. Mining the temporal statistics of query terms for searching social media posts. In ICTIR. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Kai Shu, Ping Luo, Wan Li, Peifeng Yin, and Linpeng Tang. 2014. Deal or deceit: detecting cheating in distribution channels. In CIKM. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Michele Tumminello, Fabrizio Lillo, and Rosario N Mantegna. 2010. Correlation, hierarchies, and networks in financial markets. J. of Economic Behavior & Organization 75, 1 (2010), 40–58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Chun-Che Wu, Tao Mei, Winston H Hsu, and Yong Rui. 2014. Learning to personalize trending image search suggestion. In SIGIR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Shuai Xiao, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Xiaojing Ye, Junchi Yan, Le Song, and Hongyuan Zha. 2017. Wasserstein learning of deep generative point process models. In NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Shuai Xiao, Hongtent Xu, Junchi Yan, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Xiaokang Yang, Le Song, and Hongyuan Zha. 2018. learning conditional generative models for temporal point processes. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Shuai Xiao, Junchi Yan, Xiaokang Yang, Hongyuan Zha, and Stephen M Chu. 2017. Modeling the Intensity Function of Point Process Via Recurrent Neural Networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Wei Xie, Feida Zhu, Jing Jiang, Ee-Peng Lim, and Ke Wang. 2016. Topicsketch: Real-time bursty topic detection from twitter. TKDE (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Shuang-Hong Yang and Hongyuan Zha. 2013. Mixture of mutually exciting processes for viral diffusion. In ICML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WebSci '20: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Web Science
    July 2020
    361 pages
    ISBN:9781450379892
    DOI:10.1145/3394231

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 6 July 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format