skip to main content
10.1145/3366423.3380082acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using Facebook Data to Measure Cultural Distance between Countries: The Case of Brazilian Cuisine

Published:20 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Measuring the affinity to a particular culture has been an active area of research. Countries and their residents can be characterized by many cultural aspects, such as clothing, music, art and food. As one of the central aspects, the cuisine of a country can reflect one of the dominant aspects of its culture. As such, the number of people interested in a typical national dish can be used to estimate the prevalence of that culture inside the host region. In this study, we measure the global spread of Brazilian culture across countries by exploring Facebook user’s preferences for typical Brazilian dishes through the Facebook Advertising Platform. To decide which dish will be considered typical from Brazil, we made use of spatial analysis to understand the distribution of interests around the world and to quantify how typical the dish is in Brazil and among Brazilian immigrants. This methodology can be generalized to other countries to infer cultural elements that emigrants usually take to and preserve in the countries they migrate to. Also, the interest in Brazilian typical dishes can be used to characterize countries in terms of Brazilian cultural exposition. While evaluating the cultural distance between Brazil and the countries with more Brazilian immigrants, we explore several measures of distance to compare these in the context of affinity to Brazilian cuisine. Our results revealed that these cultural distance measures can complement other metrics of distance applied to gravity-type models, for example, in order to explain flows of people between countries.

References

  1. Gina M Almerico. 2014. Food and identity: Food studies, cultural, and personal identity. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies 8 (2014), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Matheus Araujo, Yelena Mejova, Ingmar Weber, and Fabricio Benevenuto. 2017. Using facebook ads audiences for global lifestyle disease surveillance: Promises and limitations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference. 253–257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jean Boutaud, Anda Becuţ, and Angelica Marinescu. 2016. Food and culture. Cultural patterns and practices related to food in everyday life.International Review of Social Research 6 (2016), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2016-0001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Anders Brodersen, Salvatore Scellato, and Mirjam Wattenhofer. 2012. YouTube Around the World: Geographic Popularity of Videos. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web(WWW ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187870Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Joel E. Cohen, Marta Roig, Daniel C. Reuman, and Cai GoGwilt. 2008. International migration beyond gravity: A statistical model for use in population projections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 40(2008), 15269–15274. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808185105 arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/content/105/40/15269.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gustavo De Santis, Mauro Maltagliati, and Silvana Salvini. 2015. A Measure of the Cultural Distance Between Countries. Social Indicators Research 126 (03 2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0932-7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Antoine Dubois, Emilio Zagheni, Kiran Garimella, and Ingmar Weber. 2018. Studying Migrant Assimilation Through Facebook Interests. In Social Informatics, Steffen Staab, Olessia Koltsova, and Dmitry I. Ignatov (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 51–60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Thomas Faist. 2000. The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Masoomali Fatehkia, Ridhi Kashyap, and Ingmar Weber. 2018. Using Facebook ad data to track the global digital gender gap. World Development 107(2018), 189 – 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Masoomali Fatehkia, Dan O’Brien, and Ingmar Weber. 2019. Correlated impulses: Using Facebook interests to improve predictions of crime rates in urban areas. PLOS ONE 14, 2 (02 2019), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211350Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. David Garcia, Yonas Mitike Kassa, Angel Cuevas, Manuel Cebrian, Esteban Moro, Iyad Rahwan, and Ruben Cuevas. 2018. Analyzing gender inequality through large-scale Facebook advertising data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 27(2018), 6958–6963. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717781115 arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/content/115/27/6958.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Pankaj Ghemawat. 2001. Distance still matters. Harvard business review 79, 8 (2001), 137–147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Keith Head and Thierry Mayer. 2002. Illusory border effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. Vol. 1. Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Amaç Herdağdelen, Bogdan State, Lada Adamic, and Winter Mason. 2016. The Social Ties of Immigrant Communities in the United States. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science(WebSci ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2908131.2908163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Walter Isard. 1954. Location theory and trade theory: short-run analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics(1954), 305–320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Bruce Kogut and Harbir Singh. 1988. The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode. Journal of International Business Studies 19, 3 (01 Sep 1988), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Michal Kosinski, Sandra C Matz, Samuel D Gosling, Vesselin Popov, and David Stillwell. 2015. Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines.American Psychologist 70, 6 (2015), 543.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Douglas S. Massey, Joaquin Arango, Graeme Hugo, Ali Kouaouci, Adela Pellegrino, and J. Edward Taylor. 1993. Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal. Population and Development Review 19, 3 (1993), 431–466. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2938462Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Thierry Mayer and Soledad Zignago. 2011. Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: The GeoDist database. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ettore Recchi and Adrian Favell. 2019. Everyday Europe: Social transnationalism in an unsettled continent. Policy press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Filipe N. Ribeiro, Lucas Henrique, Fabrício Benevenuto, Abhijnan Chakraborty, Juhi Kulshrestha, Mahmoudreza Babaei, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2018. Media Bias Monitor: Quantifying Biases of Social Media News Outlets at Large-Scale. In Twelfth AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media(ICWSM’18). Stanford, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Filipe N. Ribeiro, Koustuv Saha, Mahmoudreza Babaei, Lucas Henrique, Johnnatan Messias, Fabrício Benevenuto Oana Goga, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Elissa M. Redmiles. 2019. On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook. In ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency(FAT*’19). Atlanta, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Vatika Sibal. 2018. Food: Identity of culture and religion. 6 (2018), 10908–10915.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Thiago H Silva, Pedro OS Vaz de Melo, Jussara M Almeida, Mirco Musolesi, and Antonio AF Loureiro. 2014. You are what you eat (and drink): Identifying cultural boundaries by analyzing food and drink habits in foursquare. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Spyridon Spyratos, Michele Vespe, Fabrizio Natale, Ingmar Weber, Emilio Zagheni, and Marzia Rango. 2018. Migration data using social media: a European perspective. Publications Office of the European Union(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ian Stewart, René D. Flores, Timothy Riffe, Ingmar Weber, and Emilio Zagheni. 2019. Rock, Rap, or Reggaeton?: Assessing Mexican Immigrants’ Cultural Assimilation Using Facebook Data,. In The World Wide Web Conference(WWW ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3258–3264. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Emilio Zagheni, Ingmar Weber, Krishna Gummadi, 2017. Leveraging Facebook’s advertising platform to monitor stocks of migrants. Population and Development Review 43, 4 (2017), 721–734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Using Facebook Data to Measure Cultural Distance between Countries: The Case of Brazilian Cuisine
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WWW '20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020
          April 2020
          3143 pages
          ISBN:9781450370233
          DOI:10.1145/3366423

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 April 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format