skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

MyAutsomeFamilyLife: Analyzing Parents of Children with Developmental Disabilities on YouTube

Published:07 November 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

While parents of young children regularly make decisions about sharing content about their child or family online, we know less about how they create, produce, and share video-based content of children with stigmatizing experiences. Through an analysis of publicly available content on YouTube, supplemented with semi-structured interviews, we report on the ways in which parents of children with developmental disabilities produce, share, and interact with others through videos of their children's experiences. Our analysis finds that parents disclose child information on YouTube to build authenticity, connect with others, advocate for social change, and justify monetization and child involvement. We discuss tensions between parents' practices and the ethical complexities of sharing and studying parent-generated content featuring children with disabilities.

References

  1. Crystal Abidin. 2017. #familygoals: Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, and Justifying Young Digital Labor. Social Media + Society 3, 2 (April 2017), 2056305117707191. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707191Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Meryl Alper. 2017. Giving Voice: Mobile Communication, Disability, and Inequality. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Tawfiq Ammari, Priya Kumar, Cliff Lampe, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Managing Children's Online Identities: How Parents Decide What to Disclose About Their Children Online. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1895--1904. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702325 event-place: Seoul, Republic of Korea.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tawfiq Ammari, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2014. Accessing Social Support and Overcoming Judgment on Social Media among Parents of Children with Special Needs. (June 2014). https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/accessing-social-support-and-overcoming-judgment-on-social-media-among-parents-of-children-with-special-needs/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tawfiq Ammari and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Networked Empowerment on Facebook Groups for Parents of Children with Special Needs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2805--2814. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702324 event-place: Seoul, Republic of Korea.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tawfiq Ammari, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Daniel M Romero. 2018. Pseudonymous parents: Comparing parenting roles and identities on the Mommit and Daddit subreddits. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 489.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lisa Anthony, Yoo Jin Kim, and Leah Findlater. 2013. Analyzing User-generated YouTube Videos to Understand Touchscreen Use by People with Motor Impairments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1223--1232. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466158event-place: Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. David Archard. 2014.Children: Rights and Childhood, 3rd Edition (Paperback) - Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Children-Rights-and-Childhood-3rd-Edition/Archard/p/book/9780415724869Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Louise Barkhuus, Elizabeth Bales, and Lisa Cowan. 2017. Internet Ecologies of New Mothers: Trust, Variety and Strategies for Managing Diverse Information Sources. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.276Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mitchell K Bartholomew, Sarah J Schoppe-Sullivan, Michael Glassman, Claire M Kamp Dush, and Jason M Sullivan.2012. New parents' Facebook use at the transition to parenthood. Family relations 61, 3 (2012), 455--469.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. John Berger (Ed.). 1987.Ways of seeing: based on the BBC television series with John Berger(reprinted ed.). BBC [u.a.], London. OCLC: 246190402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Michael S. Bernstein, Eytan Bakshy, Moira Burke, and Brian Karrer. 2013. Quantifying the Invisible Audience in Social Networks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21--30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470658Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Joan-Isaac Biel and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2011. VlogSense: Conversational behavior and social attention in YouTube. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM)7, 1 (2011), 33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lindsay Blackwell, Jean Hardy, Tawfiq Ammari, Tiffany Veinot, Cliff Lampe, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2016. LGBT Parents and Social Media: Advocacy, Privacy, and Disclosure During Shifting Social Movements. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 610--622. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858342 event-place: San Jose, California, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Alicia Blum-Ross. 2015. 'Sharenting': parent bloggers and managing children's digital footprints. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/parenting4digitalfuture/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alicia Blum-Ross and Sonia Livingstone. 2017. "Sharenting," parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self. Popular Communication 15, 2 (April 2017), 110--125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2016.1223300Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Janne CH Bromseth. 2002. Public places--public activities. Methodological approaches and ethical dilemmas in research on computer-mediated communication contexts. SKIKT' Researchers--Researching IT in context, University of Oslo, 33--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Anna Brosch. 2016. When the child is born into the Internet: Sharenting as a growing trend among parents on Facebook. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Barry Brown, Alexandra Weilenmann, Donald McMillan, and Airi Lampinen. 2016. Five Provocations for Ethical HCI Research. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 852--863. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Amy Bruckman. 2002. Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (2002), 217--231. Issue 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Moira Burke, Robert Kraut, and Diane Williams. 2010. Social Use of Computer-mediated Communication by Adults onthe Autism Spectrum. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 425--434. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718991Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Thais Castro and Ulrike Lucke. 2016. Socialization of People with Autism Through Social Networks. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Context Diversity (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Springer, Cham, 193--202. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--40238--3_19Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Charlotte Chalklen and Heather Anderson. 2017. Mothering on Facebook: exploring the privacy/openness paradox.Social Media+ Society 3, 2 (2017), 2056305117707187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kathy Charmaz. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Grace Yiseul Choi and Jennifer Lewallen. 2018. "Say Instagram, Kids!": Examining Sharenting and Children's Digital Representations on Instagram. Howard Journal of Communications 29, 2 (2018), 144--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Aymar Jean Christian. 2009. Real vlogs: The rules and meanings of online personal videos. First Monday 14, 11 (Oct.2009). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v14i11.2699Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Krystal Cleary. 2018. Disability Studies. Feminist Media Histories(2018). https://www.academia.edu/36368350/Disability_StudiesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kimberle Crenshaw. 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review43, 6 (1991), 1241--1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Hilary Davis, Jenny Waycott, and Shou Zhou. 2015. Beyond YouTube: Sharing Personal Digital Stories on a Community Display. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction(OzCHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 579--587. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838771 event-place: Parkville, VIC, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Lennard J Davis. 2016. The disability studies reader. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. M Davis, SJ Clark, DC Singer, K Hale, A Matos-Moreno, and AD Kauffman. 2015. Parents on social media: Likes and dislikes of sharenting. CS Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Health System 23, 2 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Janet Deatrick, Kathleen Knafl, and Carol Murphy-Moore. 1999. Clarifying the concept of normalization.Journal of Nursing Scholarship 31 (1999), 209--214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Nancy L. Eiesland. 1994. The Disabled God: Toward a Liberatory Theology of Disability. Abingdon Press. Google-Books-ID: 4v3YAAAAMAAJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. David Farrugia. 2009. Exploring stigma: medical knowledge and the stigmatisation of parents of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder.Sociology of Health & Illness 31, 7 (2009), 1011--1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467--9566.2009.01174.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Heather A. Faucett, Kate E. Ringland, Amanda L. L. Cullen, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2017. (In)Visibility in Disability and Assistive Technology. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 10, 4 (Oct. 2017), 14:1--14:17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Casey Fiesler and Nicholas Proferes. 2018. "Participant" Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media + Society 4,1 (2018), 2056305118763366. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Casey Fiesler, Alyson Young, Tamara Peyton, Amy S. Bruckman, Mary Gray, Jeff Hancock, and Wayne Lutters. 2015. Ethics for Studying Online Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY,USA, 289--292. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2685558Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Keegan Fornoff. 2017. Vlogging Is Killing the Reality TV Stars. https://studybreaks.com/tvfilm/vlogging-is-killing-the-reality-tv-stars/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Christopher Frauenberger, Alissa N. Antle, Monica Landoni, Janet C. Read, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2018. Ethics in Interaction Design and Children: A Panel and Community Dialogue. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 748--752. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3210802Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Christopher Frauenberger, Amy S. Bruckman, Cosmin Munteanu, Melissa Densmore, and Jenny Waycott. 2017. Research Ethics in HCI: A Town Hall Meeting. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1295--1299. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3051135Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Florencia García-Rapp and Carles Roca-Cuberes. 2017. Being an online celebrity: Norms and expectations of YouTube's beauty community. First Monday 22, 7 (July 2017). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i7.7788Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Rosemarie Garland-Thomson. 2005. Disability and Representation.PMLA120, 2 (2005), 522--527. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25486178Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosemarie Garland-Thomson. 2009. Staring: How We Look. Oxford University Press. Google-Books-ID: z0ZdbczjUo4C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Erving Goffman. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Erving Goffman et al. 1978. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. I. Goffman and Erving Goffman. 1963.Stigma; Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Prentice-Hall. Google-Books-ID: 0RAvAAAAMAAJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Charles Goodwin. 1994. Professional Vision. American Anthropologist 96, 3 (1994), 606--633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Jean W. Gowen, Deirdre Schoen Christy, and Joseph Sparling. 1993. Informational Needs of Parents of Young Children with Special Needs. Journal of Early Intervention17, 2 (April 1993), 194--210. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519301700209Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. David E. Gray. 2002. 'Everybody just freezes. Everybody is just embarrassed': felt and enacted stigma among parents of children with high functioning autism. Sociology of Health & Illness 24, 6 (2002), 734--749. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467--9566.00316Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Beth A. Haller. 2010. Representing Disability in an Ableist World: Essays on Mass Media. Advocado Press. Google-Books-ID: J6ZVbwAACAAJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Dave Harley and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2009. YouTube and intergenerational communication: the case of Geriatric1927.Universal Access in the Information Society 8, 1 (April 2009), 5--20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-008-0127-yGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Juan Pablo Hourcade, Sarah L Mascher, David Wu, and Luiza Pantoja. 2015. Look, my baby is using an iPad! An analysis of YouTube videos of infants and toddlers using tablets. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1915--1924.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Jina Huh, Leslie S. Liu, Tina Neogi, Kori Inkpen, and Wanda Pratt. 2014. Health Vlogs As Social Support for Chronic Illness Management. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.21, 4 (Aug. 2014), 23:1--23:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2630067Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. J. C. Huws, R. S. Jones, and D. K. Ingledew. 2001. Parents of Children with Autism using an Email Group: A Grounded Theory Study. Journal of Health Psychology 6, 5 (Sept. 2001), 569--584. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910530100600509Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Douglas Kellner. 2011. Cultural studies, multiculturalism, and media culture. Gender, race, and class in media: A critical reader 3 (2011), 7--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Sydney H. Kinnear, Bruce G. Link, Michelle S. Ballan, and Ruth L. Fischbach. 2016. Understanding the Experience of Stigma for Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and the Role Stigma Plays in Families' Lives. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 46, 3 (March 2016), 942--953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015--2637--9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Kathleen A Knafl and Janet A Deatrick. 2002. The challenge of normalization for families of children with chronic conditions. Pediatric Nursing 28, 1 (2002), 49--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Eden Litt. 2012. Knock, Knock. Who's There? The Imagined Audience.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56, 3(2012), 330--345. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705195 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705195Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Eden Litt and Eszter Hargittai. 2016. The Imagined Audience on Social Network Sites.Social Media + Society 2, 1(2016), 2056305116633482. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116633482 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116633482Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Leslie S. Liu, Jina Huh, Tina Neogi, Kori Inkpen, and Wanda Pratt. 2013. Health Vlogger-Viewer Interaction in Chronic Illness Management. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems CHI Conference 2013(2013), 49--58. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470663Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Taylor Lorenz. 2018. Raising a Social-Media Star. The Atlantic(2018). https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/01/raising-a-social-media-star/550418/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Sapna Maheshwari. 2019. Online and Making Thousands, at Age 4: Meet the Kidfluencers. The New York Times(March 2019). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/01/business/media/social-media-influencers-kids.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Alice E. Marwick and danah boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse,and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13, 1 (2011), 114--133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Anne McGuire. 2016. War on Autism: On the Cultural Logic of Normative Violence. University of Michigan Press. https://www.press.umich.edu/7784427/war_on_autismGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Sarah McRoberts, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Tamara Peyton, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2016. Do It for the Viewers!: Audience Engagement Behaviors of Young YouTubers. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 334--343. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930676 event-place:Manchester, United Kingdom.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Tehila Minkus, Kelvin Liu, and Keith W Ross. 2015. Children seen but not heard: When parents compromise children's online privacy. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 776--786.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Megan A Moreno, Natalie Goniu, Peter S Moreno, and Douglas Diekema. 2013. Ethics of social media research: common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking 16, 9 (2013), 708--713.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Meredith Ringel Morris. 2014. Social Networking Site Use by Mothers of Young Children. In Proceedings of the 17thACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1272--1282. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531603 event-place: Baltimore, Maryland, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Carol Moser, Tianying Chen, and Sarita Y. Schoenebeck. 2017. Parents' And Children's Preferences About Parents Sharing About Children on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5221--5225. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025587 event-place: Denver, Colorado, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Susan L. Neely-Barnes, Heather R. Hall, Ruth J. Roberts, and J. Carolyn Graff. 2011. Parenting a Child With an Autism Spectrum Disorder: Public Perceptions and Parental Conceptualizations.Journal of Family Social Work 14, 3 (May 2011), 208--225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2011.571539Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. BBC News. 2019. YouTube bans comments on all videos of children - BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47408969Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Tobias Raun. 2016.Out Online: Trans Self-Representation and Community Building on YouTube. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315599229Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Kathryn E. Ringland. 2019. "Autsome": Fostering an Autistic Identity in an Online Minecraft Community for Youth with Autism. In iConference 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Kathryn E. Ringland, Christine T. Wolf, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2015. Making "Safe": Community-Centered Practices in a Virtual World Dedicated to Children with Autism. In CSCW 2015. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Kathryn E. Ringland, Christine T. Wolf, Heather Faucett, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2016. "Will I AlwaysBe Not Social?": Re-Conceptualizing Sociality in the Context of a Minecraft Community for Autism. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1256--1269. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858038Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Sara Ryan. 2010. 'Meltdowns', surveillance and managing emotions; going out with children with autism.Health & Place 16, 5 (Sept. 2010), 868--875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2013. The secret life of online moms: Anonymity and disinhibition on youbemom.com. In Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Woosuk Seo and Hyunggu Jung. 2018. Understanding Blind or Visually Impaired People on YouTube Through Qualitative Analysis of Videos. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (TVX '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 191--196. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210825.3213565 event-place:SEOUL, Republic of Korea.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Chloe Silverman. 2012.Understanding Autism: Parents, Doctors, and the History of a Disorder. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7t3n6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Elisabeth Staksrud and Sonia Livingstone. 2009. CHILDREN AND ONLINE RISK.Information, Communication & Society 12, 3 (2009), 364--387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802635455 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802635455Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Rosemarie Garland Thomson. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. Columbia University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Tanya Titchkosky. 2007. Reading and Writing Disability Differently: The Textured Life of Embodiment. University of Toronto Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442683839Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Jessica Vitak, Katie Shilton, and Zahra Ashktorab. 2016. Beyond the Belmont Principles: Ethical Challenges, Practices,and Beliefs in the Online Data Research Community. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 941--953. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820078Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Daisuke Wakabayashi. 2019. YouTube Bans Comments on Videos of Young Children in Bid to Block Predators. The New York Times(Feb. 2019). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/28/technology/youtube-pedophile-comments.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Roberta L. Woodgate, Christine Ateah, and Loretta Secco. 2008. Living in a World of Our Own: The Experience of Parents Who Have a Child With Autism. Qualitative Health Research 18, 8 (Aug. 2008), 1075--1083.https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308320112Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Svetlana Yarosh, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Sarah McRoberts, and Tamara Peyton. 2016. YouthTube: Youth video author ship on YouTube and Vine. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1423--1437.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. MyAutsomeFamilyLife: Analyzing Parents of Children with Developmental Disabilities on YouTube

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 3, Issue CSCW
      November 2019
      5026 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3371885
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 November 2019
      Published in pacmhci Volume 3, Issue CSCW

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader