skip to main content
10.1145/3351556.3351592acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can a robot be an efficient mediator in promoting dyadic activities among children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and children of Typical Development?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Studies have provided evidence that interventions with Socially Assistive Robots (SARs), can help children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) to develop social skills. This study will outline features of SAR that respond to the heterogeneity of the ASD, thus promote interesting activities in safe environments for children with ASD to feel secure and motivated to participate. Subsequently a research will be presented, that was held with the aim to verify whether a robot can facilitate dyadic activities among children with ASD and TD, more effectively than a human mediator does.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aresti-Bartolome, N., & Garcia-Zapirain, B. (2014). Technologies as support tools for persons with autistic spectrum disorder: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 4;11(8):7767--802.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron - Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M. & Frith, U. (1985) 'Does the Autistic Child Have a "Theory of Mind"?', Cognition 21: 37--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Begum, M., Serna, R. W., &Yanco, H. A. (2016). Are robots ready to deliver autism interventions? A comprehensive review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(2), 157--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cabibihan, J. J., Javed, H., Ang, M., & Aljunied, S. M. (2013). Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. International journal of social robotics, 5(4), 593--618.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapin, S., McNaughton, D., Boyle, S., & Babb, S. (2018, September). Effects of Peer Support Interventions on the Communication of Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review. In Seminars in speech and language. Thieme Medical Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Diehl, JJ, Schmitt, LM, Villano, M., Crowell CR: The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A critical review,Research in autism spectrum disorders 6 (1), 249--262Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Feil-Seifer, D. & Matarić, M. J. (2009). Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. In Experimental robotics (pp. 201--210). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Feinstein, A. (2010). A History of Autism: Conversations with the Pioneers. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Georgescu κ.α, 2014) A. L., Kuzmanovic, B., Roth, D., Bente, G., & Vogeley, K. (2014). The use of virtual characters to assess and train non-verbal communication in high-functioning autism. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 807.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Huijnen, C. A., Lexis, M. A., Jansens, R., & de Witte, L. P. (2016). Mapping robots to therapy and educational objectives for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 46(6), 2100--2114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. François, D., Powell, S., & Dautenhahn, K. (2009). A long-term study of children with autism playing with a robotic pet: Taking inspirations from non-directive play therapy to encourage children's proactivity and initiative-taking. Interaction Studies, 10(3), 324--373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kim, E. S., Berkovits, L. D., Bernier, E. P., Leyzberg, D., Shic, F., Paul, R., &Scassellati, B. (2013). Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 43(5), 1038--1049.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lee, J., &Obinata, G. (2013, March). Developing therapeutic robot for children with autism: A study on exploring color feedback. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 8th Assosiation for Computing Machinery/Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (ACM/IEEE) International Conference on (pp. 173--174). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. LeGoff, D.B. (2004). Use of LEGO® as a therapeutic medium for improving social competence. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 34 (5), 557 571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lu, L., Petersen, F., Lacroix, L., & Rousseau, C. (2010). Stimulating creative play in children with autism through sandplay. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 37(1), 56--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Michaud, F., Salter, T., Duquette, A., Mercier, H., Larouche, H., & Larose, F. (2007). Assistive technologies and child-robot interaction. AAAI-07 (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence) Conference, Vancouver, Canada. In Proceedings of the 22nd AAAI Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pennisi, P., Tonacci, A., Tartarisco, G., Billeci, L., Ruta, L., Gangemi, S., & Pioggia, G. (2016). Autism and social robotics: A systematic review. Autism Research, 9(2), 165--183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Pop, C. A., Petrule, A. C., Pintea, S., Peca, A., Simut, R., Vanderborght, B., & David, D. O. (2013). Imitation and Social Behaviors of Children with ASD in Interaction with Robonova. A Series of Single Case experiments. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, 14(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2006) The role of the experimenter in hri research---a case study evaluation of children with autism interacting with a robotic toy. In: Proc of the 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication. IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 646--651Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dickerson P (2009) From isolation to communication: a case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. In: Proc of the second international conferences on advances in computer-human interactions, ACHI09 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., TeBoekhorst, R., & Billard, A. (2005). Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: Can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society,4, 105--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Scassellati, "How Social Robots Will Help Us to Diagnose, Treat, and Understand Autism," in Robotics Research, ser. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, S. Thrun, R. Brooks, and H. Durrant-Whyte, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2007, vol. 28, ch. 47, pp. 552--563.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Scassellati, B., Admoni, H., & Mataric, M. (2012). Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14, 275--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Spain, D., Sin, J., Linder, K. B., McMahon, J., & Happé, F. (2018). Social anxiety in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 52, 51--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Stanton, C. M., Kahn, P. H., Severson, R. L., Ruckert, J. H., & Gill, B. T. (2008, March). Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism. In 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 271--278). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Thill, S., Pop, C. A., Belpaeme, T., Ziemke, T., & Vanderborght, B. (2013). Robotassisted therapy for autism spectrum disorders with (partially) autonomous control: Challenges and outlook. Paladyn, 3(4), 209--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    BCI'19: Proceedings of the 9th Balkan Conference on Informatics
    September 2019
    225 pages

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 26 September 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    BCI'19 Paper Acceptance Rate24of73submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate97of250submissions,39%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader